Document Actions
Citation and metadata
Recommended citation
EU Commission, EU Commission: Comments on the “Opinion of European Academics on Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement”, 2 (2011) JIPITEC 171 para 1.
Download Citation
Endnote
%0 Journal Article %T EU Commission: Comments on the “Opinion of European Academics on Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement” %A Commission, EU %J JIPITEC %D 2011 %V 2 %N 2 %@ 2190-3387 %F commission2011 %X The “Opinion of European Academics on Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement” (ACTA) of February 11, 2011, was published in 2 JIPITEC 65 (2011). Signed by more than 25 law professors and academics from across Europe who specialize in the field, this opinion addressed the following concern: Although it is uncontested that the infringement of intellectual property rights, especially in the Internet, prejudices the legitimate interests of right holders, it is still very controversial in Europe and abroad whether the enforcement standards of ACTA are balanced. The European Commission, DG Trade, has now published a document with detailed comments on the Opinion. The comments, which are also available on the website of the European Commission [http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/ html/147853.htm], are republished here with the kind permission of the European Commission. %L 340 %U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-30998 %P 171-183Download
Bibtex
@Article{commission2011,
author = "Commission, EU",
title = "EU Commission: Comments on the ``Opinion of European Academics on Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement''",
journal = "JIPITEC",
year = "2011",
volume = "2",
number = "2",
pages = "171--183",
abstract = "The ``Opinion of European Academics on Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement'' (ACTA) of February 11, 2011, was published in 2 JIPITEC 65 (2011). Signed by more than 25 law professors and academics from across Europe who specialize in the field, this opinion addressed the following concern: Although it is uncontested that the infringement of intellectual property rights, especially in the Internet, prejudices the legitimate interests of right holders, it is still very controversial in Europe and abroad whether the enforcement standards of ACTA are balanced. The European Commission, DG Trade, has now published a document with detailed comments on the Opinion. The comments, which are also available on the website of the European Commission [http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/ html/147853.htm], are republished here with the kind permission of the European Commission.",
issn = "2190-3387",
url = "http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-30998"
}
Download
RIS
TY - JOUR AU - Commission, EU PY - 2011 DA - 2011// TI - EU Commission: Comments on the “Opinion of European Academics on Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement” JO - JIPITEC SP - 171 EP - 183 VL - 2 IS - 2 AB - The “Opinion of European Academics on Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement” (ACTA) of February 11, 2011, was published in 2 JIPITEC 65 (2011). Signed by more than 25 law professors and academics from across Europe who specialize in the field, this opinion addressed the following concern: Although it is uncontested that the infringement of intellectual property rights, especially in the Internet, prejudices the legitimate interests of right holders, it is still very controversial in Europe and abroad whether the enforcement standards of ACTA are balanced. The European Commission, DG Trade, has now published a document with detailed comments on the Opinion. The comments, which are also available on the website of the European Commission [http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/ html/147853.htm], are republished here with the kind permission of the European Commission. SN - 2190-3387 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-30998 ID - commission2011 ER -Download
Wordbib
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" > <b:Source> <b:Tag>commission2011</b:Tag> <b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType> <b:Year>2011</b:Year> <b:PeriodicalTitle>JIPITEC</b:PeriodicalTitle> <b:Volume>2</b:Volume> <b:Issue>2</b:Issue> <b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-30998</b:Url> <b:Pages>171-183</b:Pages> <b:Author> <b:Author><b:NameList> <b:Person><b:Last>Commission</b:Last><b:First>EU</b:First></b:Person> </b:NameList></b:Author> </b:Author> <b:Title>EU Commission: Comments on the “Opinion of European Academics on Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement”</b:Title> <b:Comments>The “Opinion of European Academics on Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement” (ACTA) of February 11, 2011, was published in 2 JIPITEC 65 (2011). Signed by more than 25 law professors and academics from across Europe who specialize in the field, this opinion addressed the following concern: Although it is uncontested that the infringement of intellectual property rights, especially in the Internet, prejudices the legitimate interests of right holders, it is still very controversial in Europe and abroad whether the enforcement standards of ACTA are balanced. The European Commission, DG Trade, has now published a document with detailed comments on the Opinion. The comments, which are also available on the website of the European Commission [http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/ html/147853.htm], are republished here with the kind permission of the European Commission.</b:Comments> </b:Source> </b:Sources>Download
ISI
PT Journal AU Commission, E TI EU Commission: Comments on the “Opinion of European Academics on Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement” SO JIPITEC PY 2011 BP 171 EP 183 VL 2 IS 2 AB The “Opinion of European Academics on Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement” (ACTA) of February 11, 2011, was published in 2 JIPITEC 65 (2011). Signed by more than 25 law professors and academics from across Europe who specialize in the field, this opinion addressed the following concern: Although it is uncontested that the infringement of intellectual property rights, especially in the Internet, prejudices the legitimate interests of right holders, it is still very controversial in Europe and abroad whether the enforcement standards of ACTA are balanced. The European Commission, DG Trade, has now published a document with detailed comments on the Opinion. The comments, which are also available on the website of the European Commission [http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/ html/147853.htm], are republished here with the kind permission of the European Commission. ERDownload
Mods
<mods>
<titleInfo>
<title>EU Commission: Comments on the “Opinion of European Academics on Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement”</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="family">Commission</namePart>
<namePart type="given">EU</namePart>
</name>
<abstract>The “Opinion of European Academics on Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement” (ACTA) of February 11, 2011, was published in 2 JIPITEC 65 (2011). Signed by more than 25 law professors and academics from across Europe who specialize in the field, this opinion addressed the following concern: Although it is uncontested that the infringement of intellectual property rights, especially in the Internet, prejudices the legitimate interests of right holders, it is still very controversial in Europe and abroad whether the enforcement standards of ACTA are balanced. The European Commission, DG Trade, has now published a document with detailed comments on the Opinion. The comments, which are also available on the website of the European Commission [http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/ html/147853.htm], are republished here with the kind permission of the European Commission.</abstract>
<subject />
<classification authority="ddc">340</classification>
<relatedItem type="host">
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<genre>academic journal</genre>
<titleInfo>
<title>JIPITEC</title>
</titleInfo>
<part>
<detail type="volume">
<number>2</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<number>2</number>
</detail>
<date>2011</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>171</start>
<end>183</end>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier>
<identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-30998</identifier>
<identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-30998</identifier>
<identifier type="citekey">commission2011</identifier>
</mods>
Download
Full Metadata
| Bibliographic Citation | Journal of intellectual property, information technology and electronic commerce law 2 (2011) 2 |
|---|---|
| Title |
EU Commission: Comments on the “Opinion of European Academics on Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement” (eng) |
| Author | EU Commission |
| Language | eng |
| Abstract | The “Opinion of European Academics on Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement” (ACTA) of February 11, 2011, was published in 2 JIPITEC 65 (2011). Signed by more than 25 law professors and academics from across Europe who specialize in the field, this opinion addressed the following concern: Although it is uncontested that the infringement of intellectual property rights, especially in the Internet, prejudices the legitimate interests of right holders, it is still very controversial in Europe and abroad whether the enforcement standards of ACTA are balanced. The European Commission, DG Trade, has now published a document with detailed comments on the Opinion. The comments, which are also available on the website of the European Commission [http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/ html/147853.htm], are republished here with the kind permission of the European Commission. |
| Subject | |
| DDC | 340 |
| Rights | DPPL |
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:0009-29-30998 |
