Citation and metadata
Recommended citation
Heiko Richter, Open Science and Public Sector Information – Reconsidering the exemption for educational and research establishments under the Directive on re-use of public sector information, 9 (2018) JIPITEC 51 para 1.
Download Citation
Endnote
%0 Journal Article %T Open Science and Public Sector Information – Reconsidering the exemption for educational and research establishments under the Directive on re-use of public sector information %A Richter, Heiko %J JIPITEC %D 2018 %V 9 %N 1 %@ 2190-3387 %F richter2018 %X The article discusses the possibilities of including public research and educational establishments within the scope of the Directive regulating the re-use of public sector information (2003/98/EC – ‘PSI Directive’). It subsequently evaluates the legal consequences of such an inclusion. Focusing on scientific information, the analysis connects the long-standing debates about open access and open educa-tion to open government data. Their common driving force is the call for a wide-spread dissemination of publicly funded information. However, the regulatory standard set out by the PSI Directive is characterized by considerable legal uncer-tainty. Therefore, it is difficult to derive robust assumptions that can form the ba-sis for predicting the effects of extending the PSI Directive’s scope to research in-formation. A potential revision of the PSI Directive should reduce this uncertain-ty. Moreover, PSI regulation must account for the specific incentives linked to the creation and dissemination of research results. This seems of primary importance for public-private research collaborations because there is a potential risk that a full application of the PSI Directive might unduly affect incentives for such col-laborations. %L 340 %K Copyright %K Database Protection %K EU Copyright Reform %K Open Access %K Open Education %K Open Government Data %K PSI Directive %K Public Sector Information %K Re-Use of Information %K Scientific Information %U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-46794 %P 51-74Download
Bibtex
@Article{richter2018, author = "Richter, Heiko", title = "Open Science and Public Sector Information -- Reconsidering the exemption for educational and research establishments under the Directive on re-use of public sector information", journal = "JIPITEC", year = "2018", volume = "9", number = "1", pages = "51--74", keywords = "Copyright; Database Protection; EU Copyright Reform; Open Access; Open Education; Open Government Data; PSI Directive; Public Sector Information; Re-Use of Information; Scientific Information", abstract = "The article discusses the possibilities of including public research and educational establishments within the scope of the Directive regulating the re-use of public sector information (2003/98/EC -- `PSI Directive'). It subsequently evaluates the legal consequences of such an inclusion. Focusing on scientific information, the analysis connects the long-standing debates about open access and open educa-tion to open government data. Their common driving force is the call for a wide-spread dissemination of publicly funded information. However, the regulatory standard set out by the PSI Directive is characterized by considerable legal uncer-tainty. Therefore, it is difficult to derive robust assumptions that can form the ba-sis for predicting the effects of extending the PSI Directive's scope to research in-formation. A potential revision of the PSI Directive should reduce this uncertain-ty. Moreover, PSI regulation must account for the specific incentives linked to the creation and dissemination of research results. This seems of primary importance for public-private research collaborations because there is a potential risk that a full application of the PSI Directive might unduly affect incentives for such col-laborations.", issn = "2190-3387", url = "http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-46794" }Download
RIS
TY - JOUR AU - Richter, Heiko PY - 2018 DA - 2018// TI - Open Science and Public Sector Information – Reconsidering the exemption for educational and research establishments under the Directive on re-use of public sector information JO - JIPITEC SP - 51 EP - 74 VL - 9 IS - 1 KW - Copyright KW - Database Protection KW - EU Copyright Reform KW - Open Access KW - Open Education KW - Open Government Data KW - PSI Directive KW - Public Sector Information KW - Re-Use of Information KW - Scientific Information AB - The article discusses the possibilities of including public research and educational establishments within the scope of the Directive regulating the re-use of public sector information (2003/98/EC – ‘PSI Directive’). It subsequently evaluates the legal consequences of such an inclusion. Focusing on scientific information, the analysis connects the long-standing debates about open access and open educa-tion to open government data. Their common driving force is the call for a wide-spread dissemination of publicly funded information. However, the regulatory standard set out by the PSI Directive is characterized by considerable legal uncer-tainty. Therefore, it is difficult to derive robust assumptions that can form the ba-sis for predicting the effects of extending the PSI Directive’s scope to research in-formation. A potential revision of the PSI Directive should reduce this uncertain-ty. Moreover, PSI regulation must account for the specific incentives linked to the creation and dissemination of research results. This seems of primary importance for public-private research collaborations because there is a potential risk that a full application of the PSI Directive might unduly affect incentives for such col-laborations. SN - 2190-3387 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-46794 ID - richter2018 ER -Download
Wordbib
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" > <b:Source> <b:Tag>richter2018</b:Tag> <b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType> <b:Year>2018</b:Year> <b:PeriodicalTitle>JIPITEC</b:PeriodicalTitle> <b:Volume>9</b:Volume> <b:Issue>1</b:Issue> <b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-46794</b:Url> <b:Pages>51-74</b:Pages> <b:Author> <b:Author><b:NameList> <b:Person><b:Last>Richter</b:Last><b:First>Heiko</b:First></b:Person> </b:NameList></b:Author> </b:Author> <b:Title>Open Science and Public Sector Information – Reconsidering the exemption for educational and research establishments under the Directive on re-use of public sector information</b:Title> <b:Comments>The article discusses the possibilities of including public research and educational establishments within the scope of the Directive regulating the re-use of public sector information (2003/98/EC – ‘PSI Directive’). It subsequently evaluates the legal consequences of such an inclusion. Focusing on scientific information, the analysis connects the long-standing debates about open access and open educa-tion to open government data. Their common driving force is the call for a wide-spread dissemination of publicly funded information. However, the regulatory standard set out by the PSI Directive is characterized by considerable legal uncer-tainty. Therefore, it is difficult to derive robust assumptions that can form the ba-sis for predicting the effects of extending the PSI Directive’s scope to research in-formation. A potential revision of the PSI Directive should reduce this uncertain-ty. Moreover, PSI regulation must account for the specific incentives linked to the creation and dissemination of research results. This seems of primary importance for public-private research collaborations because there is a potential risk that a full application of the PSI Directive might unduly affect incentives for such col-laborations.</b:Comments> </b:Source> </b:Sources>Download
ISI
PT Journal AU Richter, H TI Open Science and Public Sector Information – Reconsidering the exemption for educational and research establishments under the Directive on re-use of public sector information SO JIPITEC PY 2018 BP 51 EP 74 VL 9 IS 1 DE Copyright; Database Protection; EU Copyright Reform; Open Access; Open Education; Open Government Data; PSI Directive; Public Sector Information; Re-Use of Information; Scientific Information AB The article discusses the possibilities of including public research and educational establishments within the scope of the Directive regulating the re-use of public sector information (2003/98/EC – ‘PSI Directive’). It subsequently evaluates the legal consequences of such an inclusion. Focusing on scientific information, the analysis connects the long-standing debates about open access and open educa-tion to open government data. Their common driving force is the call for a wide-spread dissemination of publicly funded information. However, the regulatory standard set out by the PSI Directive is characterized by considerable legal uncer-tainty. Therefore, it is difficult to derive robust assumptions that can form the ba-sis for predicting the effects of extending the PSI Directive’s scope to research in-formation. A potential revision of the PSI Directive should reduce this uncertain-ty. Moreover, PSI regulation must account for the specific incentives linked to the creation and dissemination of research results. This seems of primary importance for public-private research collaborations because there is a potential risk that a full application of the PSI Directive might unduly affect incentives for such col-laborations. ERDownload
Mods
<mods> <titleInfo> <title>Open Science and Public Sector Information – Reconsidering the exemption for educational and research establishments under the Directive on re-use of public sector information</title> </titleInfo> <name type="personal"> <namePart type="family">Richter</namePart> <namePart type="given">Heiko</namePart> </name> <abstract>The article discusses the possibilities of including public research and educational establishments within the scope of the Directive regulating the re-use of public sector information (2003/98/EC – ‘PSI Directive’). It subsequently evaluates the legal consequences of such an inclusion. Focusing on scientific information, the analysis connects the long-standing debates about open access and open educa-tion to open government data. Their common driving force is the call for a wide-spread dissemination of publicly funded information. However, the regulatory standard set out by the PSI Directive is characterized by considerable legal uncer-tainty. Therefore, it is difficult to derive robust assumptions that can form the ba-sis for predicting the effects of extending the PSI Directive’s scope to research in-formation. A potential revision of the PSI Directive should reduce this uncertain-ty. Moreover, PSI regulation must account for the specific incentives linked to the creation and dissemination of research results. This seems of primary importance for public-private research collaborations because there is a potential risk that a full application of the PSI Directive might unduly affect incentives for such col-laborations.</abstract> <subject> <topic>Copyright</topic> <topic>Database Protection</topic> <topic>EU Copyright Reform</topic> <topic>Open Access</topic> <topic>Open Education</topic> <topic>Open Government Data</topic> <topic>PSI Directive</topic> <topic>Public Sector Information</topic> <topic>Re-Use of Information</topic> <topic>Scientific Information</topic> </subject> <classification authority="ddc">340</classification> <relatedItem type="host"> <genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre> <genre>academic journal</genre> <titleInfo> <title>JIPITEC</title> </titleInfo> <part> <detail type="volume"> <number>9</number> </detail> <detail type="issue"> <number>1</number> </detail> <date>2018</date> <extent unit="page"> <start>51</start> <end>74</end> </extent> </part> </relatedItem> <identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier> <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-46794</identifier> <identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-46794</identifier> <identifier type="citekey">richter2018</identifier> </mods>Download
Full Metadata
Bibliographic Citation | Journal of intellectual property, information technology and electronic commerce law 9 (2018) 1 |
---|---|
Title |
Open Science and Public Sector Information – Reconsidering the exemption for educational and research establishments under the Directive on re-use of public sector information (eng) |
Author | Heiko Richter |
Language | eng |
Abstract | The article discusses the possibilities of including public research and educational establishments within the scope of the Directive regulating the re-use of public sector information (2003/98/EC – ‘PSI Directive’). It subsequently evaluates the legal consequences of such an inclusion. Focusing on scientific information, the analysis connects the long-standing debates about open access and open educa-tion to open government data. Their common driving force is the call for a wide-spread dissemination of publicly funded information. However, the regulatory standard set out by the PSI Directive is characterized by considerable legal uncer-tainty. Therefore, it is difficult to derive robust assumptions that can form the ba-sis for predicting the effects of extending the PSI Directive’s scope to research in-formation. A potential revision of the PSI Directive should reduce this uncertain-ty. Moreover, PSI regulation must account for the specific incentives linked to the creation and dissemination of research results. This seems of primary importance for public-private research collaborations because there is a potential risk that a full application of the PSI Directive might unduly affect incentives for such col-laborations. |
Subject | Copyright, Database Protection, EU Copyright Reform, Open Access, Open Education, Open Government Data, PSI Directive, Public Sector Information, Re-Use of Information, Scientific Information |
DDC | 340 |
Rights | DPPL |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:0009-29-46794 |