Citation and metadata
Recommended citation
Eleonora Rosati, Non-Commercial Quotation and Freedom of Panorama: Useful and Lawful?, 8 (2017) JIPITEC 311 para 1.
Download Citation
Endnote
%0 Journal Article %T Non-Commercial Quotation and Freedom of Panorama: Useful and Lawful? %A Rosati, Eleonora %J JIPITEC %D 2017 %V 8 %N 4 %@ 2190-3387 %F rosati2017 %X This contribution seeks to assess both the practical implications and lawfulness of national copyright exceptions that – lacking a corresponding provision in Article 5 of Directive 2001/29 (the InfoSoc Directive) – envisage that the only permitted use of a copyright work for the sake of the applicability of a certain exception is a non-commercial one.By referring to different national exceptions allowing quotation and freedom of panorama as case studies, the paper shows some of the shortcomings deriving from different approaches to the same permitted uses of copyright works across the EU, as well as the resulting (negative) impact on the very objective underlying adoption of the InfoSoc Directive: harmonization. This contribution concludes that – in general terms – diverging approaches to copyright exceptions, including limiting the availability of certain exceptions to non-commercial uses, may be both impractical and contrary to the system established by the InfoSoc Directive. %L 340 %K Article 5 InfoSoc Directive %K CJEU %K Copyright %K InfoSoc Directive %K exceptions and limitations %K for-profit %K freedom of panorama %K non-commercial exceptions and limitations %K quotation %U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-46396 %P 311-321Download
Bibtex
@Article{rosati2017, author = "Rosati, Eleonora", title = "Non-Commercial Quotation and Freedom of Panorama: Useful and Lawful?", journal = "JIPITEC", year = "2017", volume = "8", number = "4", pages = "311--321", keywords = "Article 5 InfoSoc Directive; CJEU; Copyright; InfoSoc Directive; exceptions and limitations; for-profit; freedom of panorama; non-commercial exceptions and limitations; quotation", abstract = "This contribution seeks to assess both the practical implications and lawfulness of national copyright exceptions that -- lacking a corresponding provision in Article 5 of Directive 2001/29 (the InfoSoc Directive) -- envisage that the only permitted use of a copyright work for the sake of the applicability of a certain exception is a non-commercial one.By referring to different national exceptions allowing quotation and freedom of panorama as case studies, the paper shows some of the shortcomings deriving from different approaches to the same permitted uses of copyright works across the EU, as well as the resulting (negative) impact on the very objective underlying adoption of the InfoSoc Directive: harmonization. This contribution concludes that -- in general terms -- diverging approaches to copyright exceptions, including limiting the availability of certain exceptions to non-commercial uses, may be both impractical and contrary to the system established by the InfoSoc Directive.", issn = "2190-3387", url = "http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-46396" }Download
RIS
TY - JOUR AU - Rosati, Eleonora PY - 2017 DA - 2017// TI - Non-Commercial Quotation and Freedom of Panorama: Useful and Lawful? JO - JIPITEC SP - 311 EP - 321 VL - 8 IS - 4 KW - Article 5 InfoSoc Directive KW - CJEU KW - Copyright KW - InfoSoc Directive KW - exceptions and limitations KW - for-profit KW - freedom of panorama KW - non-commercial exceptions and limitations KW - quotation AB - This contribution seeks to assess both the practical implications and lawfulness of national copyright exceptions that – lacking a corresponding provision in Article 5 of Directive 2001/29 (the InfoSoc Directive) – envisage that the only permitted use of a copyright work for the sake of the applicability of a certain exception is a non-commercial one.By referring to different national exceptions allowing quotation and freedom of panorama as case studies, the paper shows some of the shortcomings deriving from different approaches to the same permitted uses of copyright works across the EU, as well as the resulting (negative) impact on the very objective underlying adoption of the InfoSoc Directive: harmonization. This contribution concludes that – in general terms – diverging approaches to copyright exceptions, including limiting the availability of certain exceptions to non-commercial uses, may be both impractical and contrary to the system established by the InfoSoc Directive. SN - 2190-3387 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-46396 ID - rosati2017 ER -Download
Wordbib
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" > <b:Source> <b:Tag>rosati2017</b:Tag> <b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType> <b:Year>2017</b:Year> <b:PeriodicalTitle>JIPITEC</b:PeriodicalTitle> <b:Volume>8</b:Volume> <b:Issue>4</b:Issue> <b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-46396</b:Url> <b:Pages>311-321</b:Pages> <b:Author> <b:Author><b:NameList> <b:Person><b:Last>Rosati</b:Last><b:First>Eleonora</b:First></b:Person> </b:NameList></b:Author> </b:Author> <b:Title>Non-Commercial Quotation and Freedom of Panorama: Useful and Lawful?</b:Title> <b:Comments>This contribution seeks to assess both the practical implications and lawfulness of national copyright exceptions that – lacking a corresponding provision in Article 5 of Directive 2001/29 (the InfoSoc Directive) – envisage that the only permitted use of a copyright work for the sake of the applicability of a certain exception is a non-commercial one.By referring to different national exceptions allowing quotation and freedom of panorama as case studies, the paper shows some of the shortcomings deriving from different approaches to the same permitted uses of copyright works across the EU, as well as the resulting (negative) impact on the very objective underlying adoption of the InfoSoc Directive: harmonization. This contribution concludes that – in general terms – diverging approaches to copyright exceptions, including limiting the availability of certain exceptions to non-commercial uses, may be both impractical and contrary to the system established by the InfoSoc Directive.</b:Comments> </b:Source> </b:Sources>Download
ISI
PT Journal AU Rosati, E TI Non-Commercial Quotation and Freedom of Panorama: Useful and Lawful? SO JIPITEC PY 2017 BP 311 EP 321 VL 8 IS 4 DE Article 5 InfoSoc Directive; CJEU; Copyright; InfoSoc Directive; exceptions and limitations; for-profit; freedom of panorama; non-commercial exceptions and limitations; quotation AB This contribution seeks to assess both the practical implications and lawfulness of national copyright exceptions that – lacking a corresponding provision in Article 5 of Directive 2001/29 (the InfoSoc Directive) – envisage that the only permitted use of a copyright work for the sake of the applicability of a certain exception is a non-commercial one.By referring to different national exceptions allowing quotation and freedom of panorama as case studies, the paper shows some of the shortcomings deriving from different approaches to the same permitted uses of copyright works across the EU, as well as the resulting (negative) impact on the very objective underlying adoption of the InfoSoc Directive: harmonization. This contribution concludes that – in general terms – diverging approaches to copyright exceptions, including limiting the availability of certain exceptions to non-commercial uses, may be both impractical and contrary to the system established by the InfoSoc Directive. ERDownload
Mods
<mods> <titleInfo> <title>Non-Commercial Quotation and Freedom of Panorama: Useful and Lawful?</title> </titleInfo> <name type="personal"> <namePart type="family">Rosati</namePart> <namePart type="given">Eleonora</namePart> </name> <abstract>This contribution seeks to assess both the practical implications and lawfulness of national copyright exceptions that – lacking a corresponding provision in Article 5 of Directive 2001/29 (the InfoSoc Directive) – envisage that the only permitted use of a copyright work for the sake of the applicability of a certain exception is a non-commercial one. By referring to different national exceptions allowing quotation and freedom of panorama as case studies, the paper shows some of the shortcomings deriving from different approaches to the same permitted uses of copyright works across the EU, as well as the resulting (negative) impact on the very objective underlying adoption of the InfoSoc Directive: harmonization. This contribution concludes that – in general terms – diverging approaches to copyright exceptions, including limiting the availability of certain exceptions to non-commercial uses, may be both impractical and contrary to the system established by the InfoSoc Directive.</abstract> <subject> <topic>Article 5 InfoSoc Directive</topic> <topic>CJEU</topic> <topic>Copyright</topic> <topic>InfoSoc Directive</topic> <topic>exceptions and limitations</topic> <topic>for-profit</topic> <topic>freedom of panorama</topic> <topic>non-commercial exceptions and limitations</topic> <topic>quotation</topic> </subject> <classification authority="ddc">340</classification> <relatedItem type="host"> <genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre> <genre>academic journal</genre> <titleInfo> <title>JIPITEC</title> </titleInfo> <part> <detail type="volume"> <number>8</number> </detail> <detail type="issue"> <number>4</number> </detail> <date>2017</date> <extent unit="page"> <start>311</start> <end>321</end> </extent> </part> </relatedItem> <identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier> <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-46396</identifier> <identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-46396</identifier> <identifier type="citekey">rosati2017</identifier> </mods>Download
Full Metadata
Bibliographic Citation | Journal of intellectual property, information technology and electronic commerce law 8 (2017) 4 |
---|---|
Title |
Non-Commercial Quotation and Freedom of Panorama: Useful and Lawful? (eng) |
Author | Eleonora Rosati |
Language | eng |
Abstract | This contribution seeks to assess both the practical implications and lawfulness of national copyright exceptions that – lacking a corresponding provision in Article 5 of Directive 2001/29 (the InfoSoc Directive) – envisage that the only permitted use of a copyright work for the sake of the applicability of a certain exception is a non-commercial one. By referring to different national exceptions allowing quotation and freedom of panorama as case studies, the paper shows some of the shortcomings deriving from different approaches to the same permitted uses of copyright works across the EU, as well as the resulting (negative) impact on the very objective underlying adoption of the InfoSoc Directive: harmonization. This contribution concludes that – in general terms – diverging approaches to copyright exceptions, including limiting the availability of certain exceptions to non-commercial uses, may be both impractical and contrary to the system established by the InfoSoc Directive. |
Subject | Article 5 InfoSoc Directive, CJEU, Copyright, InfoSoc Directive, exceptions and limitations, for-profit, freedom of panorama, non-commercial exceptions and limitations, quotation |
DDC | 340 |
Rights | DPPL |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:0009-29-46396 |