Document Actions

Citation and metadata

Back to the article.

Recommended citation

Kalliopi Terzidou, The Evolution of the Perception of Artificial Intelligence in the EU: The Case of Judicial Administration, 14 (2023) JIPITEC None para 1.

Download Citation

Endnote

%0 Journal Article
%T The Evolution of the Perception of Artificial Intelligence in the EU: The Case of Judicial Administration
%A Terzidou, Kalliopi
%J JIPITEC
%D 2023
%V 14
%N 2023
%@ 2190-3387
%F terzidou2023
%X Efficiency of judicial administrationis one of the priorities of justice systems, it acts asa means to achieve effective administration of justice and wider access to courts through minimumspending of resources. One element associated witha satisfactory level of court efficiency is the integra-tion and use of digital technologies by judicial staff.Artificial Intelligence (AI) stands out as a superior al-ternative to traditional digital technologies due toits use of Machine Learning (ML), to achieve desig-nated goals. This article will trace the evolution EUpolicymakers’ understanding of AI in the context ofEU Member States’ courts integrating AI systems toefficiently automate their judicial administration. By comparing AI definitions provided by EU bodies, specifically referencing the proposed AI Act, this articlehighlights the commonly accepted characteristics ofAI. Additionally, it examines arguments put forth byleading computer scientists regarding the interpretation of “intelligence” in artificial artifacts. We will findthat AI systems are perceived as systems employing ML and logic and knowledge-based approachesthat are capable of mimicking basic human cognitivefunctions to autonomously automate manual tasks.These findings will be followed by remarks on thenecessary steps for the integration of AI-based applications in EU justice systems.
%L 340
%K Artificial Intelligence
%K Judicial Administration
%K Justice
%K Efficiency
%K EU (European Union)
%U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-58424
Download

Bibtex

@Article{terzidou2023,
  author = 	"Terzidou, Kalliopi",
  title = 	"The Evolution of the Perception of Artificial Intelligence in the EU: The Case of Judicial Administration",
  journal = 	"JIPITEC",
  year = 	"2023",
  volume = 	"14",
  number = 	"2023",
  keywords = 	"Artificial Intelligence; Judicial Administration; Justice; Efficiency; EU (European Union)",
  abstract = 	"Efficiency of judicial administrationis one of the priorities of justice systems, it acts asa means to achieve effective administration of justice and wider access to courts through minimumspending of resources. One element associated witha satisfactory level of court efficiency is the integra-tion and use of digital technologies by judicial staff.Artificial Intelligence (AI) stands out as a superior al-ternative to traditional digital technologies due toits use of Machine Learning (ML), to achieve desig-nated goals. This article will trace the evolution EUpolicymakers' understanding of AI in the context ofEU Member States' courts integrating AI systems toefficiently automate their judicial administration. By comparing AI definitions provided by EU bodies, specifically referencing the proposed AI Act, this articlehighlights the commonly accepted characteristics ofAI. Additionally, it examines arguments put forth byleading computer scientists regarding the interpretation of ``intelligence'' in artificial artifacts. We will findthat AI systems are perceived as systems employing ML and logic and knowledge-based approachesthat are capable of mimicking basic human cognitivefunctions to autonomously automate manual tasks.These findings will be followed by remarks on thenecessary steps for the integration of AI-based applications in EU justice systems.",
  issn = 	"2190-3387",
  url = 	"http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-58424"
}
Download

RIS

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Terzidou, Kalliopi
PY  - 2023
DA  - 2023//
TI  - The Evolution of the Perception of Artificial Intelligence in the EU: The Case of Judicial Administration
JO  - JIPITEC
VL  - 14
IS  - 2023
KW  - Artificial Intelligence
KW  - Judicial Administration
KW  - Justice
KW  - Efficiency
KW  - EU (European Union)
AB  - Efficiency of judicial administrationis one of the priorities of justice systems, it acts asa means to achieve effective administration of justice and wider access to courts through minimumspending of resources. One element associated witha satisfactory level of court efficiency is the integra-tion and use of digital technologies by judicial staff.Artificial Intelligence (AI) stands out as a superior al-ternative to traditional digital technologies due toits use of Machine Learning (ML), to achieve desig-nated goals. This article will trace the evolution EUpolicymakers’ understanding of AI in the context ofEU Member States’ courts integrating AI systems toefficiently automate their judicial administration. By comparing AI definitions provided by EU bodies, specifically referencing the proposed AI Act, this articlehighlights the commonly accepted characteristics ofAI. Additionally, it examines arguments put forth byleading computer scientists regarding the interpretation of “intelligence” in artificial artifacts. We will findthat AI systems are perceived as systems employing ML and logic and knowledge-based approachesthat are capable of mimicking basic human cognitivefunctions to autonomously automate manual tasks.These findings will be followed by remarks on thenecessary steps for the integration of AI-based applications in EU justice systems.
SN  - 2190-3387
UR  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-58424
ID  - terzidou2023
ER  -
Download

Wordbib

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography"  xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" >
<b:Source>
<b:Tag>terzidou2023</b:Tag>
<b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType>
<b:Year>2023</b:Year>
<b:PeriodicalTitle>JIPITEC</b:PeriodicalTitle>
<b:Volume>14</b:Volume>
<b:Issue>2023</b:Issue>
<b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-58424</b:Url>
<b:Author>
<b:Author><b:NameList>
<b:Person><b:Last>Terzidou</b:Last><b:First>Kalliopi</b:First></b:Person>
</b:NameList></b:Author>
</b:Author>
<b:Title>The Evolution of the Perception of Artificial Intelligence in the EU: The Case of Judicial Administration</b:Title>
<b:Comments>Efficiency of judicial administrationis one of the priorities of justice systems, it acts asa means to achieve effective administration of justice and wider access to courts through minimumspending of resources. One element associated witha satisfactory level of court efficiency is the integra-tion and use of digital technologies by judicial staff.Artificial Intelligence (AI) stands out as a superior al-ternative to traditional digital technologies due toits use of Machine Learning (ML), to achieve desig-nated goals. This article will trace the evolution EUpolicymakers’ understanding of AI in the context ofEU Member States’ courts integrating AI systems toefficiently automate their judicial administration. By comparing AI definitions provided by EU bodies, specifically referencing the proposed AI Act, this articlehighlights the commonly accepted characteristics ofAI. Additionally, it examines arguments put forth byleading computer scientists regarding the interpretation of “intelligence” in artificial artifacts. We will findthat AI systems are perceived as systems employing ML and logic and knowledge-based approachesthat are capable of mimicking basic human cognitivefunctions to autonomously automate manual tasks.These findings will be followed by remarks on thenecessary steps for the integration of AI-based applications in EU justice systems.</b:Comments>
</b:Source>
</b:Sources>
Download

ISI

PT Journal
AU Terzidou, K
TI The Evolution of the Perception of Artificial Intelligence in the EU: The Case of Judicial Administration
SO JIPITEC
PY 2023
VL 14
IS 2023
DE Artificial Intelligence; Judicial Administration; Justice; Efficiency; EU (European Union)
AB Efficiency of judicial administrationis one of the priorities of justice systems, it acts asa means to achieve effective administration of justice and wider access to courts through minimumspending of resources. One element associated witha satisfactory level of court efficiency is the integra-tion and use of digital technologies by judicial staff.Artificial Intelligence (AI) stands out as a superior al-ternative to traditional digital technologies due toits use of Machine Learning (ML), to achieve desig-nated goals. This article will trace the evolution EUpolicymakers’ understanding of AI in the context ofEU Member States’ courts integrating AI systems toefficiently automate their judicial administration. By comparing AI definitions provided by EU bodies, specifically referencing the proposed AI Act, this articlehighlights the commonly accepted characteristics ofAI. Additionally, it examines arguments put forth byleading computer scientists regarding the interpretation of “intelligence” in artificial artifacts. We will findthat AI systems are perceived as systems employing ML and logic and knowledge-based approachesthat are capable of mimicking basic human cognitivefunctions to autonomously automate manual tasks.These findings will be followed by remarks on thenecessary steps for the integration of AI-based applications in EU justice systems.
ER
Download

Mods

<mods>
  <titleInfo>
    <title>The Evolution of the Perception of Artificial Intelligence in the EU: The Case of Judicial Administration</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart type="family">Terzidou</namePart>
    <namePart type="given">Kalliopi</namePart>
  </name>
  <abstract>Efficiency of judicial administration
is one of the priorities of justice systems, it acts as
a means to achieve effective administration of justice and wider access to courts through minimum
spending of resources. One element associated with
a satisfactory level of court efficiency is the integra-
tion and use of digital technologies by judicial staff.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) stands out as a superior al-
ternative to traditional digital technologies due to
its use of Machine Learning (ML), to achieve desig-
nated goals. This article will trace the evolution EU
policymakers’ understanding of AI in the context of
EU Member States’ courts integrating AI systems to
efficiently automate their judicial administration. By comparing AI definitions provided by EU bodies, specifically referencing the proposed AI Act, this article
highlights the commonly accepted characteristics of
AI. Additionally, it examines arguments put forth by
leading computer scientists regarding the interpretation of “intelligence” in artificial artifacts. We will find
that AI systems are perceived as systems employing ML and logic and knowledge-based approaches
that are capable of mimicking basic human cognitive
functions to autonomously automate manual tasks.
These findings will be followed by remarks on the
necessary steps for the integration of AI-based applications in EU justice systems.</abstract>
  <subject>
    <topic>Artificial Intelligence</topic>
    <topic>Judicial Administration</topic>
    <topic>Justice</topic>
    <topic>Efficiency</topic>
    <topic>EU (European Union)</topic>
  </subject>
  <classification authority="ddc">340</classification>
  <relatedItem type="host">
    <genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
    <genre>academic journal</genre>
    <titleInfo>
      <title>JIPITEC</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <part>
      <detail type="volume">
        <number>14</number>
      </detail>
      <detail type="issue">
        <number>2023</number>
      </detail>
      <date>2023</date>
    </part>
  </relatedItem>
  <identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier>
  <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-58424</identifier>
  <identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-58424</identifier>
  <identifier type="citekey">terzidou2023</identifier>
</mods>
Download

Full Metadata

Bibliographic Citation Journal of intellectual property, information technology and electronic commerce law 14 (2023) 2023
Title

The Evolution of the Perception of Artificial Intelligence in the EU: The Case of Judicial Administration (eng)
Author Kalliopi Terzidou
Language eng
Abstract Efficiency of judicial administration is one of the priorities of justice systems, it acts as a means to achieve effective administration of justice and wider access to courts through minimum spending of resources. One element associated with a satisfactory level of court efficiency is the integra- tion and use of digital technologies by judicial staff. Artificial Intelligence (AI) stands out as a superior al- ternative to traditional digital technologies due to its use of Machine Learning (ML), to achieve desig- nated goals. This article will trace the evolution EU policymakers’ understanding of AI in the context of EU Member States’ courts integrating AI systems to efficiently automate their judicial administration. By comparing AI definitions provided by EU bodies, specifically referencing the proposed AI Act, this article highlights the commonly accepted characteristics of AI. Additionally, it examines arguments put forth by leading computer scientists regarding the interpretation of “intelligence” in artificial artifacts. We will find that AI systems are perceived as systems employing ML and logic and knowledge-based approaches that are capable of mimicking basic human cognitive functions to autonomously automate manual tasks. These findings will be followed by remarks on the necessary steps for the integration of AI-based applications in EU justice systems.
Subject Artificial Intelligence, Judicial Administration, Justice, Efficiency, EU (European Union)
DDC 340
Rights DPPL
URN: urn:nbn:de:0009-29-58424
JIPITEC – Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law
Article search
Extended article search
Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter
Follow Us
twitter
 
Navigation