Document Actions
Citation and metadata
Recommended citation
María Barral Martínez, Platform regulation, content moderation, and AI-based filtering tools: Some reflections from the European Union, 14 (2023) JIPITEC 211 para 1.
Download Citation
Endnote
%0 Journal Article %T Platform regulation, content moderation, and AI-based filtering tools: Some reflections from the European Union %A Barral Martínez, María %J JIPITEC %D 2023 %V 14 %N 1 %@ 2190-3387 %F barral martínez2023 %X Online platforms have voluntarily relied on screening tools for content moderation purposes for quite some time now. They do so to deal with the problems of scale and the speed content is shared online. Currently, the efforts of online platforms to fight illegal and harmful content are continuously focusing on innovative AI-based solutions for better performance of their content moderation systems. At the same time in the EU, new rules on content moderation are entering the arena. These rules may require a more active role of online intermediaries to detect and remove illegal content in their sites. This begs the question whether we are moving towards a filtering obligation in disguise on online intermediaries. If that is the case, are AI-based filtering systems fit to avoid blocking lawful content? What safeguards should be taken at regulatory level to ensure the protection of fundamental rights of online users? %L 340 %K DSA %K EU law %K artificial intelligence %K content moderation %K filtering tools %K platform regulation %U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-57165 %P 211-NoneDownload
Bibtex
@Article{barralmartínez2023,
author = "Barral Mart{\'i}nez, Mar{\'i}a",
title = "Platform regulation, content moderation, and AI-based filtering tools: Some reflections from the European Union",
journal = "JIPITEC",
year = "2023",
volume = "14",
number = "1",
pages = "211--None",
keywords = "DSA; EU law; artificial intelligence; content moderation; filtering tools; platform regulation",
abstract = "Online platforms have voluntarily relied on screening tools for content moderation purposes for quite some time now. They do so to deal with the problems of scale and the speed content is shared online. Currently, the efforts of online platforms to fight illegal and harmful content are continuously focusing on innovative AI-based solutions for better performance of their content moderation systems. At the same time in the EU, new rules on content moderation are entering the arena. These rules may require a more active role of online intermediaries to detect and remove illegal content in their sites. This begs the question whether we are moving towards a filtering obligation in disguise on online intermediaries. If that is the case, are AI-based filtering systems fit to avoid blocking lawful content? What safeguards should be taken at regulatory level to ensure the protection of fundamental rights of online users?",
issn = "2190-3387",
url = "http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-57165"
}
Download
RIS
TY - JOUR AU - Barral Martínez, María PY - 2023 DA - 2023// TI - Platform regulation, content moderation, and AI-based filtering tools: Some reflections from the European Union JO - JIPITEC SP - 211 EP - None VL - 14 IS - 1 KW - DSA KW - EU law KW - artificial intelligence KW - content moderation KW - filtering tools KW - platform regulation AB - Online platforms have voluntarily relied on screening tools for content moderation purposes for quite some time now. They do so to deal with the problems of scale and the speed content is shared online. Currently, the efforts of online platforms to fight illegal and harmful content are continuously focusing on innovative AI-based solutions for better performance of their content moderation systems. At the same time in the EU, new rules on content moderation are entering the arena. These rules may require a more active role of online intermediaries to detect and remove illegal content in their sites. This begs the question whether we are moving towards a filtering obligation in disguise on online intermediaries. If that is the case, are AI-based filtering systems fit to avoid blocking lawful content? What safeguards should be taken at regulatory level to ensure the protection of fundamental rights of online users? SN - 2190-3387 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-57165 ID - barral martínez2023 ER -Download
Wordbib
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" > <b:Source> <b:Tag>barral martínez2023</b:Tag> <b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType> <b:Year>2023</b:Year> <b:PeriodicalTitle>JIPITEC</b:PeriodicalTitle> <b:Volume>14</b:Volume> <b:Issue>1</b:Issue> <b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-57165</b:Url> <b:Pages>211-None</b:Pages> <b:Author> <b:Author><b:NameList> <b:Person><b:Last>Barral Martínez</b:Last><b:First>María</b:First></b:Person> </b:NameList></b:Author> </b:Author> <b:Title>Platform regulation, content moderation, and AI-based filtering tools: Some reflections from the European Union</b:Title> <b:Comments>Online platforms have voluntarily relied on screening tools for content moderation purposes for quite some time now. They do so to deal with the problems of scale and the speed content is shared online. Currently, the efforts of online platforms to fight illegal and harmful content are continuously focusing on innovative AI-based solutions for better performance of their content moderation systems. At the same time in the EU, new rules on content moderation are entering the arena. These rules may require a more active role of online intermediaries to detect and remove illegal content in their sites. This begs the question whether we are moving towards a filtering obligation in disguise on online intermediaries. If that is the case, are AI-based filtering systems fit to avoid blocking lawful content? What safeguards should be taken at regulatory level to ensure the protection of fundamental rights of online users?</b:Comments> </b:Source> </b:Sources>Download
ISI
PT Journal AU Barral Martínez, M TI Platform regulation, content moderation, and AI-based filtering tools: Some reflections from the European Union SO JIPITEC PY 2023 BP 211 EP None VL 14 IS 1 DE DSA; EU law; artificial intelligence; content moderation; filtering tools; platform regulation AB Online platforms have voluntarily relied on screening tools for content moderation purposes for quite some time now. They do so to deal with the problems of scale and the speed content is shared online. Currently, the efforts of online platforms to fight illegal and harmful content are continuously focusing on innovative AI-based solutions for better performance of their content moderation systems. At the same time in the EU, new rules on content moderation are entering the arena. These rules may require a more active role of online intermediaries to detect and remove illegal content in their sites. This begs the question whether we are moving towards a filtering obligation in disguise on online intermediaries. If that is the case, are AI-based filtering systems fit to avoid blocking lawful content? What safeguards should be taken at regulatory level to ensure the protection of fundamental rights of online users? ERDownload
Mods
<mods>
<titleInfo>
<title>Platform regulation, content moderation, and AI-based filtering tools: Some reflections from the European Union</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="family">Barral Martínez</namePart>
<namePart type="given">María</namePart>
</name>
<abstract>Online platforms have voluntarily relied on screening tools for content moderation purposes for quite some time now. They do so to deal with the problems of scale and the speed content is shared online. Currently, the efforts of online platforms to fight illegal and harmful content are continuously focusing on innovative AI-based solutions for better performance of their content moderation systems. At the same time in the EU, new rules on content moderation are entering the arena. These rules may require a more active role of online intermediaries to detect and remove illegal content in their sites. This begs the question whether we are moving towards a filtering obligation in disguise on online intermediaries. If that is the case, are AI-based filtering systems fit to avoid blocking lawful content? What safeguards should be taken at regulatory level to ensure the protection of fundamental rights of online users?</abstract>
<subject>
<topic>DSA</topic>
<topic>EU law</topic>
<topic>artificial intelligence</topic>
<topic>content moderation</topic>
<topic>filtering tools</topic>
<topic>platform regulation</topic>
</subject>
<classification authority="ddc">340</classification>
<relatedItem type="host">
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<genre>academic journal</genre>
<titleInfo>
<title>JIPITEC</title>
</titleInfo>
<part>
<detail type="volume">
<number>14</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<number>1</number>
</detail>
<date>2023</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>211</start>
<end>None</end>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier>
<identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-57165</identifier>
<identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-57165</identifier>
<identifier type="citekey">barral martínez2023</identifier>
</mods>
Download
Full Metadata
| Bibliographic Citation | Journal of intellectual property, information technology and electronic commerce law 14 (2023) 1 |
|---|---|
| Title |
Platform regulation, content moderation, and AI-based filtering tools: Some reflections from the European Union (eng) |
| Author | María Barral Martínez |
| Language | eng |
| Abstract | Online platforms have voluntarily relied on screening tools for content moderation purposes for quite some time now. They do so to deal with the problems of scale and the speed content is shared online. Currently, the efforts of online platforms to fight illegal and harmful content are continuously focusing on innovative AI-based solutions for better performance of their content moderation systems. At the same time in the EU, new rules on content moderation are entering the arena. These rules may require a more active role of online intermediaries to detect and remove illegal content in their sites. This begs the question whether we are moving towards a filtering obligation in disguise on online intermediaries. If that is the case, are AI-based filtering systems fit to avoid blocking lawful content? What safeguards should be taken at regulatory level to ensure the protection of fundamental rights of online users? |
| Subject | DSA, EU law, artificial intelligence, content moderation, filtering tools, platform regulation |
| DDC | 340 |
| Rights | DPPL |
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:0009-29-57165 |
