Citation and metadata
Recommended citation
Marta Duque Lizarralde, Christofer Meinecke, Authorless AI-assisted productions: Recent developments impacting their protection in the European Union, 14 (2023) JIPITEC 84 para 1.
Download Citation
Endnote
%0 Journal Article %T Authorless AI-assisted productions: Recent developments impacting their protection in the European Union %A Duque Lizarralde, Marta %A Meinecke, Christofer %J JIPITEC %D 2023 %V 14 %N 1 %@ 2190-3387 %F duque lizarralde2023 %X The question of whether AI-generated works can be protected by copyright has become a hot topic over the last few years. However, “AI-generated works”, at least as currently defined in some policy and legal texts, do not exist. This article seeks to explain how machine learning and natural language processing, which are two subfields of Artificial Intelligence, are used in the creative process. It then outlines the obstacles that works created with AI face in order to be classified as protectable subject matter. After that, it briefly analyses whether such works can be protected by existing related rights and concludes by discussing the arguments put forward in the academic literature in favour of the creation of a new exclusive right to encourage investment in “creative AI”. %L 340 %K AI-generated works %K Authorless AI-assisted productions %K Authorship %K Copyright %K Originality %U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-57096 %P 84-94Download
Bibtex
@Article{duquelizarralde2023, author = "Duque Lizarralde, Marta and Meinecke, Christofer", title = "Authorless AI-assisted productions: Recent developments impacting their protection in the European Union", journal = "JIPITEC", year = "2023", volume = "14", number = "1", pages = "84--94", keywords = "AI-generated works; Authorless AI-assisted productions; Authorship; Copyright; Originality", abstract = "The question of whether AI-generated works can be protected by copyright has become a hot topic over the last few years. However, ``AI-generated works'', at least as currently defined in some policy and legal texts, do not exist. This article seeks to explain how machine learning and natural language processing, which are two subfields of Artificial Intelligence, are used in the creative process. It then outlines the obstacles that works created with AI face in order to be classified as protectable subject matter. After that, it briefly analyses whether such works can be protected by existing related rights and concludes by discussing the arguments put forward in the academic literature in favour of the creation of a new exclusive right to encourage investment in ``creative AI''.", issn = "2190-3387", url = "http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-57096" }Download
RIS
TY - JOUR AU - Duque Lizarralde, Marta AU - Meinecke, Christofer PY - 2023 DA - 2023// TI - Authorless AI-assisted productions: Recent developments impacting their protection in the European Union JO - JIPITEC SP - 84 EP - 94 VL - 14 IS - 1 KW - AI-generated works KW - Authorless AI-assisted productions KW - Authorship KW - Copyright KW - Originality AB - The question of whether AI-generated works can be protected by copyright has become a hot topic over the last few years. However, “AI-generated works”, at least as currently defined in some policy and legal texts, do not exist. This article seeks to explain how machine learning and natural language processing, which are two subfields of Artificial Intelligence, are used in the creative process. It then outlines the obstacles that works created with AI face in order to be classified as protectable subject matter. After that, it briefly analyses whether such works can be protected by existing related rights and concludes by discussing the arguments put forward in the academic literature in favour of the creation of a new exclusive right to encourage investment in “creative AI”. SN - 2190-3387 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-57096 ID - duque lizarralde2023 ER -Download
Wordbib
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" > <b:Source> <b:Tag>duque lizarralde2023</b:Tag> <b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType> <b:Year>2023</b:Year> <b:PeriodicalTitle>JIPITEC</b:PeriodicalTitle> <b:Volume>14</b:Volume> <b:Issue>1</b:Issue> <b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-57096</b:Url> <b:Pages>84-94</b:Pages> <b:Author> <b:Author><b:NameList> <b:Person><b:Last>Duque Lizarralde</b:Last><b:First>Marta</b:First></b:Person> <b:Person><b:Last>Meinecke</b:Last><b:First>Christofer</b:First></b:Person> </b:NameList></b:Author> </b:Author> <b:Title>Authorless AI-assisted productions: Recent developments impacting their protection in the European Union</b:Title> <b:Comments>The question of whether AI-generated works can be protected by copyright has become a hot topic over the last few years. However, “AI-generated works”, at least as currently defined in some policy and legal texts, do not exist. This article seeks to explain how machine learning and natural language processing, which are two subfields of Artificial Intelligence, are used in the creative process. It then outlines the obstacles that works created with AI face in order to be classified as protectable subject matter. After that, it briefly analyses whether such works can be protected by existing related rights and concludes by discussing the arguments put forward in the academic literature in favour of the creation of a new exclusive right to encourage investment in “creative AI”.</b:Comments> </b:Source> </b:Sources>Download
ISI
PT Journal AU Duque Lizarralde, M Meinecke, C TI Authorless AI-assisted productions: Recent developments impacting their protection in the European Union SO JIPITEC PY 2023 BP 84 EP 94 VL 14 IS 1 DE AI-generated works; Authorless AI-assisted productions; Authorship; Copyright; Originality AB The question of whether AI-generated works can be protected by copyright has become a hot topic over the last few years. However, “AI-generated works”, at least as currently defined in some policy and legal texts, do not exist. This article seeks to explain how machine learning and natural language processing, which are two subfields of Artificial Intelligence, are used in the creative process. It then outlines the obstacles that works created with AI face in order to be classified as protectable subject matter. After that, it briefly analyses whether such works can be protected by existing related rights and concludes by discussing the arguments put forward in the academic literature in favour of the creation of a new exclusive right to encourage investment in “creative AI”. ERDownload
Mods
<mods> <titleInfo> <title>Authorless AI-assisted productions: Recent developments impacting their protection in the European Union</title> </titleInfo> <name type="personal"> <namePart type="family">Duque Lizarralde</namePart> <namePart type="given">Marta</namePart> </name> <name type="personal"> <namePart type="family">Meinecke</namePart> <namePart type="given">Christofer</namePart> </name> <abstract>The question of whether AI-generated works can be protected by copyright has become a hot topic over the last few years. However, “AI-generated works”, at least as currently defined in some policy and legal texts, do not exist. This article seeks to explain how machine learning and natural language processing, which are two subfields of Artificial Intelligence, are used in the creative process. It then outlines the obstacles that works created with AI face in order to be classified as protectable subject matter. After that, it briefly analyses whether such works can be protected by existing related rights and concludes by discussing the arguments put forward in the academic literature in favour of the creation of a new exclusive right to encourage investment in “creative AI”.</abstract> <subject> <topic>AI-generated works</topic> <topic>Authorless AI-assisted productions</topic> <topic>Authorship</topic> <topic>Copyright</topic> <topic>Originality</topic> </subject> <classification authority="ddc">340</classification> <relatedItem type="host"> <genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre> <genre>academic journal</genre> <titleInfo> <title>JIPITEC</title> </titleInfo> <part> <detail type="volume"> <number>14</number> </detail> <detail type="issue"> <number>1</number> </detail> <date>2023</date> <extent unit="page"> <start>84</start> <end>94</end> </extent> </part> </relatedItem> <identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier> <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-57096</identifier> <identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-57096</identifier> <identifier type="citekey">duque lizarralde2023</identifier> </mods>Download
Full Metadata
Bibliographic Citation | Journal of intellectual property, information technology and electronic commerce law 14 (2023) 1 |
---|---|
Title |
Authorless AI-assisted productions: Recent developments impacting their protection in the European Union (eng) |
Author | Marta Duque Lizarralde, Christofer Meinecke |
Language | eng |
Abstract | The question of whether AI-generated works can be protected by copyright has become a hot topic over the last few years. However, “AI-generated works”, at least as currently defined in some policy and legal texts, do not exist. This article seeks to explain how machine learning and natural language processing, which are two subfields of Artificial Intelligence, are used in the creative process. It then outlines the obstacles that works created with AI face in order to be classified as protectable subject matter. After that, it briefly analyses whether such works can be protected by existing related rights and concludes by discussing the arguments put forward in the academic literature in favour of the creation of a new exclusive right to encourage investment in “creative AI”. |
Subject | AI-generated works, Authorless AI-assisted productions, Authorship, Copyright, Originality |
DDC | 340 |
Rights | DPPL |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:0009-29-57096 |