Document Actions
Citation and metadata
Recommended citation
Bart van de Sloot, Home is where the heart is: the household exemption in the 21st century, 14 (2023) JIPITEC 34 para 1.
Download Citation
Endnote
%0 Journal Article %T Home is where the heart is: the household exemption in the 21st century %A van de Sloot, Bart %J JIPITEC %D 2023 %V 14 %N 1 %@ 2190-3387 %F van de sloot2023 %X The household exemption provides that the data protection regime does not apply when a natural person processes personal data for purely personal or household activities. The exemption was inserted because personal and household activities were considered to fall under the right to privacy and because it was deemed unlikely that such activities would cause significant harm. Ever since its introduction, but especially due to its interpretation by the Court of Justice and the partial revision under the GDPR, ambiguity and uncertainty have plagued the exemption. Moreover, because of the increased access of citizens to data processing technologies and the ease with which large amounts of (sensitive) data can be made public, the question is whether the initial rationale for the household exemption is still valid and whether it should be revised or even omitted from the data protection regime. %L 340 %K GDPR %K Jehovan todistajat %K Lindqvist %K Rynes %K household exemption %U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-57060 %P 34-53Download
Bibtex
@Article{vandesloot2023,
author = "van de Sloot, Bart",
title = "Home is where the heart is: the household exemption in the 21st century",
journal = "JIPITEC",
year = "2023",
volume = "14",
number = "1",
pages = "34--53",
keywords = "GDPR; Jehovan todistajat; Lindqvist; Rynes; household exemption",
abstract = "The household exemption provides that the data protection regime does not apply when a natural person processes personal data for purely personal or household activities. The exemption was inserted because personal and household activities were considered to fall under the right to privacy and because it was deemed unlikely that such activities would cause significant harm. Ever since its introduction, but especially due to its interpretation by the Court of Justice and the partial revision under the GDPR, ambiguity and uncertainty have plagued the exemption. Moreover, because of the increased access of citizens to data processing technologies and the ease with which large amounts of (sensitive) data can be made public, the question is whether the initial rationale for the household exemption is still valid and whether it should be revised or even omitted from the data protection regime.",
issn = "2190-3387",
url = "http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-57060"
}
Download
RIS
TY - JOUR AU - van de Sloot, Bart PY - 2023 DA - 2023// TI - Home is where the heart is: the household exemption in the 21st century JO - JIPITEC SP - 34 EP - 53 VL - 14 IS - 1 KW - GDPR KW - Jehovan todistajat KW - Lindqvist KW - Rynes KW - household exemption AB - The household exemption provides that the data protection regime does not apply when a natural person processes personal data for purely personal or household activities. The exemption was inserted because personal and household activities were considered to fall under the right to privacy and because it was deemed unlikely that such activities would cause significant harm. Ever since its introduction, but especially due to its interpretation by the Court of Justice and the partial revision under the GDPR, ambiguity and uncertainty have plagued the exemption. Moreover, because of the increased access of citizens to data processing technologies and the ease with which large amounts of (sensitive) data can be made public, the question is whether the initial rationale for the household exemption is still valid and whether it should be revised or even omitted from the data protection regime. SN - 2190-3387 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-57060 ID - van de sloot2023 ER -Download
Wordbib
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" > <b:Source> <b:Tag>van de sloot2023</b:Tag> <b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType> <b:Year>2023</b:Year> <b:PeriodicalTitle>JIPITEC</b:PeriodicalTitle> <b:Volume>14</b:Volume> <b:Issue>1</b:Issue> <b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-57060</b:Url> <b:Pages>34-53</b:Pages> <b:Author> <b:Author><b:NameList> <b:Person><b:Last>van de Sloot</b:Last><b:First>Bart</b:First></b:Person> </b:NameList></b:Author> </b:Author> <b:Title>Home is where the heart is: the household exemption in the 21st century</b:Title> <b:Comments>The household exemption provides that the data protection regime does not apply when a natural person processes personal data for purely personal or household activities. The exemption was inserted because personal and household activities were considered to fall under the right to privacy and because it was deemed unlikely that such activities would cause significant harm. Ever since its introduction, but especially due to its interpretation by the Court of Justice and the partial revision under the GDPR, ambiguity and uncertainty have plagued the exemption. Moreover, because of the increased access of citizens to data processing technologies and the ease with which large amounts of (sensitive) data can be made public, the question is whether the initial rationale for the household exemption is still valid and whether it should be revised or even omitted from the data protection regime.</b:Comments> </b:Source> </b:Sources>Download
ISI
PT Journal AU van de Sloot, B TI Home is where the heart is: the household exemption in the 21st century SO JIPITEC PY 2023 BP 34 EP 53 VL 14 IS 1 DE GDPR; Jehovan todistajat; Lindqvist; Rynes; household exemption AB The household exemption provides that the data protection regime does not apply when a natural person processes personal data for purely personal or household activities. The exemption was inserted because personal and household activities were considered to fall under the right to privacy and because it was deemed unlikely that such activities would cause significant harm. Ever since its introduction, but especially due to its interpretation by the Court of Justice and the partial revision under the GDPR, ambiguity and uncertainty have plagued the exemption. Moreover, because of the increased access of citizens to data processing technologies and the ease with which large amounts of (sensitive) data can be made public, the question is whether the initial rationale for the household exemption is still valid and whether it should be revised or even omitted from the data protection regime. ERDownload
Mods
<mods>
<titleInfo>
<title>Home is where the heart is: the household exemption in the 21st century</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="family">van de Sloot</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Bart</namePart>
</name>
<abstract>The household exemption provides that the data protection regime does not apply when a natural person processes personal data for purely personal or household activities. The exemption was inserted because personal and household activities were considered to fall under the right to privacy and because it was deemed unlikely that such activities would cause significant harm. Ever since its introduction, but especially due to its interpretation by the Court of Justice and the partial revision under the GDPR, ambiguity and uncertainty have plagued the exemption. Moreover, because of the increased access of citizens to data processing technologies and the ease with which large amounts of (sensitive) data can be made public, the question is whether the initial rationale for the household exemption is still valid and whether it should be revised or even omitted from the data protection regime.</abstract>
<subject>
<topic>GDPR</topic>
<topic>Jehovan todistajat</topic>
<topic>Lindqvist</topic>
<topic>Rynes</topic>
<topic>household exemption</topic>
</subject>
<classification authority="ddc">340</classification>
<relatedItem type="host">
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<genre>academic journal</genre>
<titleInfo>
<title>JIPITEC</title>
</titleInfo>
<part>
<detail type="volume">
<number>14</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<number>1</number>
</detail>
<date>2023</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>34</start>
<end>53</end>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier>
<identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-57060</identifier>
<identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-57060</identifier>
<identifier type="citekey">van de sloot2023</identifier>
</mods>
Download
Full Metadata
| Bibliographic Citation | Journal of intellectual property, information technology and electronic commerce law 14 (2023) 1 |
|---|---|
| Title |
Home is where the heart is: the household exemption in the 21st century (eng) |
| Author | Bart van de Sloot |
| Language | eng |
| Abstract | The household exemption provides that the data protection regime does not apply when a natural person processes personal data for purely personal or household activities. The exemption was inserted because personal and household activities were considered to fall under the right to privacy and because it was deemed unlikely that such activities would cause significant harm. Ever since its introduction, but especially due to its interpretation by the Court of Justice and the partial revision under the GDPR, ambiguity and uncertainty have plagued the exemption. Moreover, because of the increased access of citizens to data processing technologies and the ease with which large amounts of (sensitive) data can be made public, the question is whether the initial rationale for the household exemption is still valid and whether it should be revised or even omitted from the data protection regime. |
| Subject | GDPR, Jehovan todistajat, Lindqvist, Rynes, household exemption |
| DDC | 340 |
| Rights | DPPL |
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:0009-29-57060 |
