Document Actions
Citation and metadata
Recommended citation
Rolf H. Weber, The Right to Be Forgotten More Than a Pandora’s Box?, 2 (2011) JIPITEC 120 para 1.
Download Citation
Endnote
%0 Journal Article %T The Right to Be Forgotten More Than a Pandora’s Box? %A Weber, Rolf H. %J JIPITEC %D 2011 %V 2 %N 2 %@ 2190-3387 %F weber2011 %X Recently, political voices have stressed the need to introduce a right to be forgotten as new human right. Individuals should have the right to make potentially damaging information disappear after a certain time has elapsed. Such new right, however, can come in conflict with the principle of free speech. Therefore, its scope needs to be evaluated in the light of appropriate data protection rules. Insofar, a more user-centered approach is to be realized. “Delete” can not be a value as such, but must be balanced within a new legal framework. %L 340 %K Data protection %K delete %K free speech %K privacy %K privacy enhancing technologies %K user-centered approach %U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-30849 %P 120-130Download
Bibtex
@Article{weber2011,
author = "Weber, Rolf H.",
title = "The Right to Be Forgotten More Than a Pandora's Box?",
journal = "JIPITEC",
year = "2011",
volume = "2",
number = "2",
pages = "120--130",
keywords = "Data protection; delete; free speech; privacy; privacy enhancing technologies; user-centered approach",
abstract = "Recently, political voices have stressed the need to introduce a right to be forgotten as new human right. Individuals should have the right to make potentially damaging information disappear after a certain time has elapsed. Such new right, however, can come in conflict with the principle of free speech. Therefore, its scope needs to be evaluated in the light of appropriate data protection rules. Insofar, a more user-centered approach is to be realized. ``Delete'' can not be a value as such, but must be balanced within a new legal framework.",
issn = "2190-3387",
url = "http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-30849"
}
Download
RIS
TY - JOUR AU - Weber, Rolf H. PY - 2011 DA - 2011// TI - The Right to Be Forgotten More Than a Pandora’s Box? JO - JIPITEC SP - 120 EP - 130 VL - 2 IS - 2 KW - Data protection KW - delete KW - free speech KW - privacy KW - privacy enhancing technologies KW - user-centered approach AB - Recently, political voices have stressed the need to introduce a right to be forgotten as new human right. Individuals should have the right to make potentially damaging information disappear after a certain time has elapsed. Such new right, however, can come in conflict with the principle of free speech. Therefore, its scope needs to be evaluated in the light of appropriate data protection rules. Insofar, a more user-centered approach is to be realized. “Delete” can not be a value as such, but must be balanced within a new legal framework. SN - 2190-3387 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-30849 ID - weber2011 ER -Download
Wordbib
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" > <b:Source> <b:Tag>weber2011</b:Tag> <b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType> <b:Year>2011</b:Year> <b:PeriodicalTitle>JIPITEC</b:PeriodicalTitle> <b:Volume>2</b:Volume> <b:Issue>2</b:Issue> <b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-30849</b:Url> <b:Pages>120-130</b:Pages> <b:Author> <b:Author><b:NameList> <b:Person><b:Last>Weber</b:Last><b:First>Rolf H.</b:First></b:Person> </b:NameList></b:Author> </b:Author> <b:Title>The Right to Be Forgotten More Than a Pandora’s Box?</b:Title> <b:Comments>Recently, political voices have stressed the need to introduce a right to be forgotten as new human right. Individuals should have the right to make potentially damaging information disappear after a certain time has elapsed. Such new right, however, can come in conflict with the principle of free speech. Therefore, its scope needs to be evaluated in the light of appropriate data protection rules. Insofar, a more user-centered approach is to be realized. “Delete” can not be a value as such, but must be balanced within a new legal framework.</b:Comments> </b:Source> </b:Sources>Download
ISI
PT Journal AU Weber, R TI The Right to Be Forgotten More Than a Pandora’s Box? SO JIPITEC PY 2011 BP 120 EP 130 VL 2 IS 2 DE Data protection; delete; free speech; privacy; privacy enhancing technologies; user-centered approach AB Recently, political voices have stressed the need to introduce a right to be forgotten as new human right. Individuals should have the right to make potentially damaging information disappear after a certain time has elapsed. Such new right, however, can come in conflict with the principle of free speech. Therefore, its scope needs to be evaluated in the light of appropriate data protection rules. Insofar, a more user-centered approach is to be realized. “Delete” can not be a value as such, but must be balanced within a new legal framework. ERDownload
Mods
<mods>
<titleInfo>
<title>The Right to Be Forgotten More Than a Pandora’s Box?</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="family">Weber</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Rolf H.</namePart>
</name>
<abstract>Recently, political voices have stressed the need to introduce a right to be forgotten as new human right. Individuals should have the right to make potentially damaging information disappear after a certain time has elapsed. Such new right, however, can come in conflict with the principle of free speech. Therefore, its scope needs to be evaluated in the light of appropriate data protection rules. Insofar, a more user-centered approach is to be realized. “Delete” can not be a value as such, but must be balanced within a new legal framework.</abstract>
<subject>
<topic>Data protection</topic>
<topic>delete</topic>
<topic>free speech</topic>
<topic>privacy</topic>
<topic>privacy enhancing technologies</topic>
<topic>user-centered approach</topic>
</subject>
<classification authority="ddc">340</classification>
<relatedItem type="host">
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<genre>academic journal</genre>
<titleInfo>
<title>JIPITEC</title>
</titleInfo>
<part>
<detail type="volume">
<number>2</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<number>2</number>
</detail>
<date>2011</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>120</start>
<end>130</end>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier>
<identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-30849</identifier>
<identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-30849</identifier>
<identifier type="citekey">weber2011</identifier>
</mods>
Download
Full Metadata
| Bibliographic Citation | Journal of intellectual property, information technology and electronic commerce law 2 (2011) 2 |
|---|---|
| Title |
The Right to Be Forgotten More Than a Pandora’s Box? (eng) |
| Author | Rolf H. Weber |
| Language | eng |
| Abstract | Recently, political voices have stressed the need to introduce a right to be forgotten as new human right. Individuals should have the right to make potentially damaging information disappear after a certain time has elapsed. Such new right, however, can come in conflict with the principle of free speech. Therefore, its scope needs to be evaluated in the light of appropriate data protection rules. Insofar, a more user-centered approach is to be realized. “Delete” can not be a value as such, but must be balanced within a new legal framework. |
| Subject | Data protection, delete, free speech, privacy, privacy enhancing technologies, user-centered approach |
| DDC | 340 |
| Rights | DPPL |
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:0009-29-30849 |
