Document Actions

Citation and metadata

Recommended citation

Bizer K, Lankau M, Spindler G, Zimbehl P (2011). Sui Generis Rights for the Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions Policy Implications. jipitec, Vol. 2. (urn:nbn:de:0009-29-30835)

Download Citation

Endnote

%0 Journal Article
%T Sui Generis Rights for the Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions Policy Implications
%A Bizer, Kilian
%A Lankau, Matthias
%A Spindler, Gerald
%A Zimbehl, Philipp
%J jipitec
%D 2011
%V 2
%N 2
%@ 2190-3387
%F bizer2011
%X Within the international community there have been many calls for better protection of traditional cultural expressions (TCEs), for which classic instruments of intellectual property rights do not seem to fit. In response, at least five model laws have been advanced within the last 40 years. These are referred to as sui generis because, though they generally belong to the realm of intellectual property they structurally depart from classic copyright law to accommodate the needs of the holders of TCEs. The purpose of this paper is to provide a well-founded basis for national policy makers who wish to implement protection for TCEs within their country. This is achieved by systematically comparing and evaluating economic effects that can be expected to result from these regulatory alternatives and a related system or private ordering. Specifically, we compare if and how protection preferences of local communities are met as well as the social costs that are likely to arise from the different model laws.
%L 340
%K Sui generis
%K law and economics
%K policy
%K private ordering
%K traditional cultural expressions
%U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-30835

Bibtex

@Article{bizer2011,
  author = 	"Bizer, Kilian
		and Lankau, Matthias
		and Spindler, Gerald
		and Zimbehl, Philipp",
  title = 	"Sui Generis Rights for the Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions Policy Implications",
  journal = 	"jipitec",
  year = 	"2011",
  volume = 	"2",
  number = 	"2",
  keywords = 	"Sui generis",
  keywords = 	"law and economics",
  keywords = 	"policy",
  keywords = 	"private ordering",
  keywords = 	"traditional cultural expressions",
  abstract = 	"Within the international community there have been many calls for better protection of traditional cultural expressions (TCEs), for which classic instruments of intellectual property rights do not seem to fit. In response, at least five model laws have been advanced within the last 40 years. These are referred to as sui generis because, though they generally belong to the realm of intellectual property they structurally depart from classic copyright law to accommodate the needs of the holders of TCEs. The purpose of this paper is to provide a well-founded basis for national policy makers who wish to implement protection for TCEs within their country. This is achieved by systematically comparing and evaluating economic effects that can be expected to result from these regulatory alternatives and a related system or private ordering. Specifically, we compare if and how protection preferences of local communities are met as well as the social costs that are likely to arise from the different model laws.",
  issn = 	"2190-3387",
  url = 	"http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-30835"
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bizer, Kilian
AU  - Lankau, Matthias
AU  - Spindler, Gerald
AU  - Zimbehl, Philipp
PY  - 2011//
TI  - Sui Generis Rights for the Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions Policy Implications
JO  - jipitec
VL  - 2
IS  - 2
KW  - Sui generis
KW  - law and economics
KW  - policy
KW  - private ordering
KW  - traditional cultural expressions
N2  - Within the international community there have been many calls for better protection of traditional cultural expressions (TCEs), for which classic instruments of intellectual property rights do not seem to fit. In response, at least five model laws have been advanced within the last 40 years. These are referred to as sui generis because, though they generally belong to the realm of intellectual property they structurally depart from classic copyright law to accommodate the needs of the holders of TCEs. The purpose of this paper is to provide a well-founded basis for national policy makers who wish to implement protection for TCEs within their country. This is achieved by systematically comparing and evaluating economic effects that can be expected to result from these regulatory alternatives and a related system or private ordering. Specifically, we compare if and how protection preferences of local communities are met as well as the social costs that are likely to arise from the different model laws.
SN  - 2190-3387
UR  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-30835
ID  - bizer2011
ER  - 

Wordbib

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography"  xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" >
<b:Source>
<b:Tag>bizer2011</b:Tag>
<b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType>
<b:Year>2011</b:Year>
<b:PeriodicalName>jipitec</b:PeriodicalName>
<b:Volume>2</b:Volume>
<b:Issue>2</b:Issue>
<b:Author>
<b:Author><b:NameList>
<b:Person><b:Last>Bizer</b:Last><b:First>Kilian</b:First></b:Person>
<b:Person><b:Last>Lankau</b:Last><b:First>Matthias</b:First></b:Person>
<b:Person><b:Last>Spindler</b:Last><b:First>Gerald</b:First></b:Person>
<b:Person><b:Last>Zimbehl</b:Last><b:First>Philipp</b:First></b:Person>
</b:NameList></b:Author>
</b:Author>
<b:Title>Sui Generis Rights for the Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions Policy Implications</b:Title>
<b:Comments>Within the international community there have been many calls for better protection of traditional cultural expressions (TCEs), for which classic instruments of intellectual property rights do not seem to fit. In response, at least five model laws have been advanced within the last 40 years. These are referred to as sui generis because, though they generally belong to the realm of intellectual property they structurally depart from classic copyright law to accommodate the needs of the holders of TCEs. The purpose of this paper is to provide a well-founded basis for national policy makers who wish to implement protection for TCEs within their country. This is achieved by systematically comparing and evaluating economic effects that can be expected to result from these regulatory alternatives and a related system or private ordering. Specifically, we compare if and how protection preferences of local communities are met as well as the social costs that are likely to arise from the different model laws.</b:Comments>
</b:Source>
</b:Sources>

ISI

PT Journal
AU Bizer, K
   Lankau, M
   Spindler, G
   Zimbehl, P
TI Sui Generis Rights for the Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions Policy Implications
SO jipitec
PY 2011
VL 2
IS 2
DE Sui generis; law and economics; policy; private ordering; traditional cultural expressions
AB Within the international community there have been many calls for better protection of traditional cultural expressions (TCEs), for which classic instruments of intellectual property rights do not seem to fit. In response, at least five model laws have been advanced within the last 40 years. These are referred to as sui generis because, though they generally belong to the realm of intellectual property they structurally depart from classic copyright law to accommodate the needs of the holders of TCEs. The purpose of this paper is to provide a well-founded basis for national policy makers who wish to implement protection for TCEs within their country. This is achieved by systematically comparing and evaluating economic effects that can be expected to result from these regulatory alternatives and a related system or private ordering. Specifically, we compare if and how protection preferences of local communities are met as well as the social costs that are likely to arise from the different model laws.
ER

Mods

<mods>
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Sui Generis Rights for the Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions Policy Implications</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart type="family">Bizer</namePart>
    <namePart type="given">Kilian</namePart>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart type="family">Lankau</namePart>
    <namePart type="given">Matthias</namePart>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart type="family">Spindler</namePart>
    <namePart type="given">Gerald</namePart>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart type="family">Zimbehl</namePart>
    <namePart type="given">Philipp</namePart>
  </name>
  <abstract>Within the international community there have been many calls for better protection of traditional cultural expressions (TCEs), for which classic instruments of intellectual property rights do not seem to fit. In response, at least five model laws have been advanced within the last 40 years. These are referred to as sui generis because, though they generally belong to the realm of intellectual property they structurally depart from classic copyright law to accommodate the needs of the holders of TCEs. The purpose of this paper is to provide a well-founded basis for national policy makers who wish to implement protection for TCEs within their country. This is achieved by systematically comparing and evaluating economic effects that can be expected to result from these regulatory alternatives and a related system or private ordering. Specifically, we compare if and how protection preferences of local communities are met as well as the social costs that are likely to arise from the different model laws.</abstract>
  <subject>
    <topic>Sui generis</topic>
    <topic>law and economics</topic>
    <topic>policy</topic>
    <topic>private ordering</topic>
    <topic>traditional cultural expressions</topic>
  </subject>
  <classification authority="ddc">340</classification>
  <relatedItem type="host">
    <genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
    <genre>academic journal</genre>
    <titleInfo>
      <title>jipitec</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <part>
      <detail type="volume">
        <number>2</number>
      </detail>
      <detail type="issue">
        <number>2</number>
      </detail>
      <date>2011</date>
    </part>
  </relatedItem>
  <identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier>
  <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-30835</identifier>
  <identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-30835</identifier>
  <identifier type="citekey">bizer2011</identifier>
</mods>

Full Metadata

JIPITEC – Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law