Citation and metadata
Recommended citation
Kilian Bizer, Matthias Lankau, Gerald Spindler, Philipp Zimbehl, Sui Generis Rights for the Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions Policy Implications, 2 (2011) JIPITEC 114 para 1.
Download Citation
Endnote
%0 Journal Article %T Sui Generis Rights for the Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions Policy Implications %A Bizer, Kilian %A Lankau, Matthias %A Spindler, Gerald %A Zimbehl, Philipp %J JIPITEC %D 2011 %V 2 %N 2 %@ 2190-3387 %F bizer2011 %X Within the international community there have been many calls for better protection of traditional cultural expressions (TCEs), for which classic instruments of intellectual property rights do not seem to fit. In response, at least five model laws have been advanced within the last 40 years. These are referred to as sui generis because, though they generally belong to the realm of intellectual property they structurally depart from classic copyright law to accommodate the needs of the holders of TCEs. The purpose of this paper is to provide a well-founded basis for national policy makers who wish to implement protection for TCEs within their country. This is achieved by systematically comparing and evaluating economic effects that can be expected to result from these regulatory alternatives and a related system or private ordering. Specifically, we compare if and how protection preferences of local communities are met as well as the social costs that are likely to arise from the different model laws. %L 340 %K Sui generis %K law and economics %K policy %K private ordering %K traditional cultural expressions %U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-30835 %P 114-119Download
Bibtex
@Article{bizer2011, author = "Bizer, Kilian and Lankau, Matthias and Spindler, Gerald and Zimbehl, Philipp", title = "Sui Generis Rights for the Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions Policy Implications", journal = "JIPITEC", year = "2011", volume = "2", number = "2", pages = "114--119", keywords = "Sui generis; law and economics; policy; private ordering; traditional cultural expressions", abstract = "Within the international community there have been many calls for better protection of traditional cultural expressions (TCEs), for which classic instruments of intellectual property rights do not seem to fit. In response, at least five model laws have been advanced within the last 40 years. These are referred to as sui generis because, though they generally belong to the realm of intellectual property they structurally depart from classic copyright law to accommodate the needs of the holders of TCEs. The purpose of this paper is to provide a well-founded basis for national policy makers who wish to implement protection for TCEs within their country. This is achieved by systematically comparing and evaluating economic effects that can be expected to result from these regulatory alternatives and a related system or private ordering. Specifically, we compare if and how protection preferences of local communities are met as well as the social costs that are likely to arise from the different model laws.", issn = "2190-3387", url = "http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-30835" }Download
RIS
TY - JOUR AU - Bizer, Kilian AU - Lankau, Matthias AU - Spindler, Gerald AU - Zimbehl, Philipp PY - 2011 DA - 2011// TI - Sui Generis Rights for the Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions Policy Implications JO - JIPITEC SP - 114 EP - 119 VL - 2 IS - 2 KW - Sui generis KW - law and economics KW - policy KW - private ordering KW - traditional cultural expressions AB - Within the international community there have been many calls for better protection of traditional cultural expressions (TCEs), for which classic instruments of intellectual property rights do not seem to fit. In response, at least five model laws have been advanced within the last 40 years. These are referred to as sui generis because, though they generally belong to the realm of intellectual property they structurally depart from classic copyright law to accommodate the needs of the holders of TCEs. The purpose of this paper is to provide a well-founded basis for national policy makers who wish to implement protection for TCEs within their country. This is achieved by systematically comparing and evaluating economic effects that can be expected to result from these regulatory alternatives and a related system or private ordering. Specifically, we compare if and how protection preferences of local communities are met as well as the social costs that are likely to arise from the different model laws. SN - 2190-3387 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-30835 ID - bizer2011 ER -Download
Wordbib
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" > <b:Source> <b:Tag>bizer2011</b:Tag> <b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType> <b:Year>2011</b:Year> <b:PeriodicalTitle>JIPITEC</b:PeriodicalTitle> <b:Volume>2</b:Volume> <b:Issue>2</b:Issue> <b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-30835</b:Url> <b:Pages>114-119</b:Pages> <b:Author> <b:Author><b:NameList> <b:Person><b:Last>Bizer</b:Last><b:First>Kilian</b:First></b:Person> <b:Person><b:Last>Lankau</b:Last><b:First>Matthias</b:First></b:Person> <b:Person><b:Last>Spindler</b:Last><b:First>Gerald</b:First></b:Person> <b:Person><b:Last>Zimbehl</b:Last><b:First>Philipp</b:First></b:Person> </b:NameList></b:Author> </b:Author> <b:Title>Sui Generis Rights for the Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions Policy Implications</b:Title> <b:Comments>Within the international community there have been many calls for better protection of traditional cultural expressions (TCEs), for which classic instruments of intellectual property rights do not seem to fit. In response, at least five model laws have been advanced within the last 40 years. These are referred to as sui generis because, though they generally belong to the realm of intellectual property they structurally depart from classic copyright law to accommodate the needs of the holders of TCEs. The purpose of this paper is to provide a well-founded basis for national policy makers who wish to implement protection for TCEs within their country. This is achieved by systematically comparing and evaluating economic effects that can be expected to result from these regulatory alternatives and a related system or private ordering. Specifically, we compare if and how protection preferences of local communities are met as well as the social costs that are likely to arise from the different model laws.</b:Comments> </b:Source> </b:Sources>Download
ISI
PT Journal AU Bizer, K Lankau, M Spindler, G Zimbehl, P TI Sui Generis Rights for the Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions Policy Implications SO JIPITEC PY 2011 BP 114 EP 119 VL 2 IS 2 DE Sui generis; law and economics; policy; private ordering; traditional cultural expressions AB Within the international community there have been many calls for better protection of traditional cultural expressions (TCEs), for which classic instruments of intellectual property rights do not seem to fit. In response, at least five model laws have been advanced within the last 40 years. These are referred to as sui generis because, though they generally belong to the realm of intellectual property they structurally depart from classic copyright law to accommodate the needs of the holders of TCEs. The purpose of this paper is to provide a well-founded basis for national policy makers who wish to implement protection for TCEs within their country. This is achieved by systematically comparing and evaluating economic effects that can be expected to result from these regulatory alternatives and a related system or private ordering. Specifically, we compare if and how protection preferences of local communities are met as well as the social costs that are likely to arise from the different model laws. ERDownload
Mods
<mods> <titleInfo> <title>Sui Generis Rights for the Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions Policy Implications</title> </titleInfo> <name type="personal"> <namePart type="family">Bizer</namePart> <namePart type="given">Kilian</namePart> </name> <name type="personal"> <namePart type="family">Lankau</namePart> <namePart type="given">Matthias</namePart> </name> <name type="personal"> <namePart type="family">Spindler</namePart> <namePart type="given">Gerald</namePart> </name> <name type="personal"> <namePart type="family">Zimbehl</namePart> <namePart type="given">Philipp</namePart> </name> <abstract>Within the international community there have been many calls for better protection of traditional cultural expressions (TCEs), for which classic instruments of intellectual property rights do not seem to fit. In response, at least five model laws have been advanced within the last 40 years. These are referred to as sui generis because, though they generally belong to the realm of intellectual property they structurally depart from classic copyright law to accommodate the needs of the holders of TCEs. The purpose of this paper is to provide a well-founded basis for national policy makers who wish to implement protection for TCEs within their country. This is achieved by systematically comparing and evaluating economic effects that can be expected to result from these regulatory alternatives and a related system or private ordering. Specifically, we compare if and how protection preferences of local communities are met as well as the social costs that are likely to arise from the different model laws.</abstract> <subject> <topic>Sui generis</topic> <topic>law and economics</topic> <topic>policy</topic> <topic>private ordering</topic> <topic>traditional cultural expressions</topic> </subject> <classification authority="ddc">340</classification> <relatedItem type="host"> <genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre> <genre>academic journal</genre> <titleInfo> <title>JIPITEC</title> </titleInfo> <part> <detail type="volume"> <number>2</number> </detail> <detail type="issue"> <number>2</number> </detail> <date>2011</date> <extent unit="page"> <start>114</start> <end>119</end> </extent> </part> </relatedItem> <identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier> <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-30835</identifier> <identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-30835</identifier> <identifier type="citekey">bizer2011</identifier> </mods>Download
Full Metadata
Bibliographic Citation | Journal of intellectual property, information technology and electronic commerce law 2 (2011) 2 |
---|---|
Title |
Sui Generis Rights for the Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions Policy Implications (eng) |
Author | Kilian Bizer, Matthias Lankau, Gerald Spindler, Philipp Zimbehl |
Language | eng |
Abstract | Within the international community there have been many calls for better protection of traditional cultural expressions (TCEs), for which classic instruments of intellectual property rights do not seem to fit. In response, at least five model laws have been advanced within the last 40 years. These are referred to as sui generis because, though they generally belong to the realm of intellectual property they structurally depart from classic copyright law to accommodate the needs of the holders of TCEs. The purpose of this paper is to provide a well-founded basis for national policy makers who wish to implement protection for TCEs within their country. This is achieved by systematically comparing and evaluating economic effects that can be expected to result from these regulatory alternatives and a related system or private ordering. Specifically, we compare if and how protection preferences of local communities are met as well as the social costs that are likely to arise from the different model laws. |
Subject | Sui generis, law and economics, policy, private ordering, traditional cultural expressions |
DDC | 340 |
Rights | DPPL |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:0009-29-30835 |