Document Actions

Citation and metadata

Recommended citation

Morten Hviid, Simone Schroff, John Street, Regulating Collective Management Organisations by Competition: An Incomplete Answer to the Licensing Problem?, 7 (2017) JIPITEC 256 para 1.

Download Citation

Endnote

%0 Journal Article
%T Regulating Collective Management Organisations by Competition: An Incomplete Answer to the Licensing Problem?
%A Hviid, Morten
%A Schroff, Simone
%A Street, John
%J JIPITEC
%D 2017
%V 7
%N 3
%@ 2190-3387
%F hviid2017
%X While the three functions of Collective Management Organisations - to licence use, monitor use, and to collect and distribute the revenue - have traditionally been accepted as a progression towards a natural (national) monopoly, digital exploitation of music may no longer lead to such a fate. The European Commission has challenged the traditional structures through reforms that increase the degree of competition. This paper asks whether the reforms have had the desired effect and shows, through qualitative research, that at least regarding the streaming of music, competition has not delivered. Part of the reason for this may be that the services required by the now competing CMOs have changed.
%L 340
%K Collective Management Organisations
%K EC
%K competition
%K licensing
%K qualitative research
%K reforms
%U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-45071
%P 256-270

Download

Bibtex

@Article{hviid2017,
  author = 	"Hviid, Morten
		and Schroff, Simone
		and Street, John",
  title = 	"Regulating Collective Management Organisations by Competition: An Incomplete Answer to the Licensing Problem?",
  journal = 	"JIPITEC",
  year = 	"2017",
  volume = 	"7",
  number = 	"3",
  pages = 	"256--270",
  keywords = 	"Collective Management Organisations; EC; competition; licensing; qualitative research; reforms",
  abstract = 	"While the three functions of Collective Management Organisations - to licence use, monitor use, and to collect and distribute the revenue - have traditionally been accepted as a progression towards a natural (national) monopoly, digital exploitation of music may no longer lead to such a fate. The European Commission has challenged the traditional structures through reforms that increase the degree of competition. This paper asks whether the reforms have had the desired effect and shows, through qualitative research, that at least regarding the streaming of music, competition has not delivered. Part of the reason for this may be that the services required by the now competing CMOs have changed.",
  issn = 	"2190-3387",
  url = 	"http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-45071"
}

Download

RIS

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Hviid, Morten
AU  - Schroff, Simone
AU  - Street, John
PY  - 2017
DA  - 2017//
TI  - Regulating Collective Management Organisations by Competition: An Incomplete Answer to the Licensing Problem?
JO  - JIPITEC
SP  - 256
EP  - 270
VL  - 7
IS  - 3
KW  - Collective Management Organisations
KW  - EC
KW  - competition
KW  - licensing
KW  - qualitative research
KW  - reforms
AB  - While the three functions of Collective Management Organisations - to licence use, monitor use, and to collect and distribute the revenue - have traditionally been accepted as a progression towards a natural (national) monopoly, digital exploitation of music may no longer lead to such a fate. The European Commission has challenged the traditional structures through reforms that increase the degree of competition. This paper asks whether the reforms have had the desired effect and shows, through qualitative research, that at least regarding the streaming of music, competition has not delivered. Part of the reason for this may be that the services required by the now competing CMOs have changed.
SN  - 2190-3387
UR  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-45071
ID  - hviid2017
ER  - 
Download

Wordbib

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography"  xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" >
<b:Source>
<b:Tag>hviid2017</b:Tag>
<b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType>
<b:Year>2017</b:Year>
<b:PeriodicalTitle>JIPITEC</b:PeriodicalTitle>
<b:Volume>7</b:Volume>
<b:Issue>3</b:Issue>
<b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-45071</b:Url>
<b:Pages>256-270</b:Pages>
<b:Author>
<b:Author><b:NameList>
<b:Person><b:Last>Hviid</b:Last><b:First>Morten</b:First></b:Person>
<b:Person><b:Last>Schroff</b:Last><b:First>Simone</b:First></b:Person>
<b:Person><b:Last>Street</b:Last><b:First>John</b:First></b:Person>
</b:NameList></b:Author>
</b:Author>
<b:Title>Regulating Collective Management Organisations by Competition: An Incomplete Answer to the Licensing Problem?</b:Title>
<b:Comments>While the three functions of Collective Management Organisations - to licence use, monitor use, and to collect and distribute the revenue - have traditionally been accepted as a progression towards a natural (national) monopoly, digital exploitation of music may no longer lead to such a fate. The European Commission has challenged the traditional structures through reforms that increase the degree of competition. This paper asks whether the reforms have had the desired effect and shows, through qualitative research, that at least regarding the streaming of music, competition has not delivered. Part of the reason for this may be that the services required by the now competing CMOs have changed.</b:Comments>
</b:Source>
</b:Sources>
Download

ISI

PT Journal
AU Hviid, M
   Schroff, S
   Street, J
TI Regulating Collective Management Organisations by Competition: An Incomplete Answer to the Licensing Problem?
SO JIPITEC
PY 2017
BP 256
EP 270
VL 7
IS 3
DE Collective Management Organisations; EC; competition; licensing; qualitative research; reforms
AB While the three functions of Collective Management Organisations - to licence use, monitor use, and to collect and distribute the revenue - have traditionally been accepted as a progression towards a natural (national) monopoly, digital exploitation of music may no longer lead to such a fate. The European Commission has challenged the traditional structures through reforms that increase the degree of competition. This paper asks whether the reforms have had the desired effect and shows, through qualitative research, that at least regarding the streaming of music, competition has not delivered. Part of the reason for this may be that the services required by the now competing CMOs have changed.
ER

Download

Mods

<mods>
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Regulating Collective Management Organisations by Competition: An Incomplete Answer to the Licensing Problem?</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart type="family">Hviid</namePart>
    <namePart type="given">Morten</namePart>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart type="family">Schroff</namePart>
    <namePart type="given">Simone</namePart>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart type="family">Street</namePart>
    <namePart type="given">John</namePart>
  </name>
  <abstract>While the three functions of Collective Management Organisations - to licence use, monitor use, and to collect and distribute the revenue - have traditionally been accepted as a progression towards a natural (national) monopoly, digital exploitation of music may no longer lead to such a fate. The European Commission has challenged the traditional structures through reforms that increase the degree of competition. This paper asks whether the reforms have had the desired effect and shows, through qualitative research, that at least regarding the streaming of music, competition has not delivered. Part of the reason for this may be that the services required by the now competing CMOs have changed.</abstract>
  <subject>
    <topic>Collective Management Organisations</topic>
    <topic>EC</topic>
    <topic>competition</topic>
    <topic>licensing</topic>
    <topic>qualitative research</topic>
    <topic>reforms</topic>
  </subject>
  <classification authority="ddc">340</classification>
  <relatedItem type="host">
    <genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
    <genre>academic journal</genre>
    <titleInfo>
      <title>JIPITEC</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <part>
      <detail type="volume">
        <number>7</number>
      </detail>
      <detail type="issue">
        <number>3</number>
      </detail>
      <date>2017</date>
      <extent unit="page">
        <start>256</start>
        <end>270</end>
      </extent>
    </part>
  </relatedItem>
  <identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier>
  <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-45071</identifier>
  <identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-45071</identifier>
  <identifier type="citekey">hviid2017</identifier>
</mods>
Download

Full Metadata

JIPITEC – Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law
Article search
Extended article search
Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter
Follow Us
twitter