Document Actions
Citation and metadata
Recommended citation
Agnieszka Vetulani-Cęgiel, EU Copyright Law, Lobbying and Transparency of Policy-Making: The cases of sound recordings term extension and orphan works provisions, 6 (2015) JIPITEC 146 para 1.
Download Citation
Endnote
%0 Journal Article %T EU Copyright Law, Lobbying and Transparency of Policy-Making: The cases of sound recordings term extension and orphan works provisions %A Vetulani-Cęgiel, Agnieszka %J JIPITEC %D 2015 %V 6 %N 2 %@ 2190-3387 %F vetulani-cęgiel2015 %X The objective of this paper is to discuss EU lobbying in the area of copyright. Legislation needs to regulate the legal position of various different stakeholders in a balanced manner. However, a number of EU copyright provisions brought into effect over recent years were highly controversial and have led to suggestions that powerful lobbying forces may have had some influence. This article investigates the effects of lobbying on copyright law-making in Europe. A specific comparative and multi-faceted analysis is provided of the legislative process for two recently adopted directives: 2011/77/EU which extends the term of protection of sound recordings and 2012/28/EU which introduces certain permitted uses of orphan works (some references are also made to the ACTA case). Firstly, a short presentation is given of the legal bases for the EU consultation process and lobbying. Next, an analysis is provided of the two cases, taking into consideration the policy-making procedures (with special focus on how the consultation process was handled), the legal solutions proposed and adopted and the various stakeholders’ claims. Lastly, it asks why some interest groups were successful and some others failed (the analysis identifies two types of factor for the effectiveness of lobbying: those resulting from stakeholders’ actions and those connected with the consultation process). %L 340 %K Consultation %K Copyright %K Interest Group %K Law-Making %K Library %K Lobbying; Stakeholder %K Music %K Orphan Work %K Phonogram; EU %K Policy-Making %K Sound Recording %K Transparency %U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-42757 %P 146-162Download
Bibtex
@Article{vetulani-cęgiel2015,
author = "Vetulani-C{\k{e}}giel, Agnieszka",
title = "EU Copyright Law, Lobbying and Transparency of Policy-Making: The cases of sound recordings term extension and orphan works provisions",
journal = "JIPITEC",
year = "2015",
volume = "6",
number = "2",
pages = "146--162",
keywords = "Consultation; Copyright; Interest Group; Law-Making; Library; Lobbying; Stakeholder; Music; Orphan Work; Phonogram; EU; Policy-Making; Sound Recording; Transparency",
abstract = "The objective of this paper is to discuss EU lobbying in the area of copyright. Legislation needs to regulate the legal position of various different stakeholders in a balanced manner. However, a number of EU copyright provisions brought into effect over recent years were highly controversial and have led to suggestions that powerful lobbying forces may have had some influence. This article investigates the effects of lobbying on copyright law-making in Europe. A specific comparative and multi-faceted analysis is provided of the legislative process for two recently adopted directives: 2011/77/EU which extends the term of protection of sound recordings and 2012/28/EU which introduces certain permitted uses of orphan works (some references are also made to the ACTA case). Firstly, a short presentation is given of the legal bases for the EU consultation process and lobbying. Next, an analysis is provided of the two cases, taking into consideration the policy-making procedures (with special focus on how the consultation process was handled), the legal solutions proposed and adopted and the various stakeholders' claims. Lastly, it asks why some interest groups were successful and some others failed (the analysis identifies two types of factor for the effectiveness of lobbying: those resulting from stakeholders' actions and those connected with the consultation process).",
issn = "2190-3387",
url = "http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-42757"
}
Download
RIS
TY - JOUR AU - Vetulani-Cęgiel, Agnieszka PY - 2015 DA - 2015// TI - EU Copyright Law, Lobbying and Transparency of Policy-Making: The cases of sound recordings term extension and orphan works provisions JO - JIPITEC SP - 146 EP - 162 VL - 6 IS - 2 KW - Consultation KW - Copyright KW - Interest Group KW - Law-Making KW - Library KW - Lobbying; Stakeholder KW - Music KW - Orphan Work KW - Phonogram; EU KW - Policy-Making KW - Sound Recording KW - Transparency AB - The objective of this paper is to discuss EU lobbying in the area of copyright. Legislation needs to regulate the legal position of various different stakeholders in a balanced manner. However, a number of EU copyright provisions brought into effect over recent years were highly controversial and have led to suggestions that powerful lobbying forces may have had some influence. This article investigates the effects of lobbying on copyright law-making in Europe. A specific comparative and multi-faceted analysis is provided of the legislative process for two recently adopted directives: 2011/77/EU which extends the term of protection of sound recordings and 2012/28/EU which introduces certain permitted uses of orphan works (some references are also made to the ACTA case). Firstly, a short presentation is given of the legal bases for the EU consultation process and lobbying. Next, an analysis is provided of the two cases, taking into consideration the policy-making procedures (with special focus on how the consultation process was handled), the legal solutions proposed and adopted and the various stakeholders’ claims. Lastly, it asks why some interest groups were successful and some others failed (the analysis identifies two types of factor for the effectiveness of lobbying: those resulting from stakeholders’ actions and those connected with the consultation process). SN - 2190-3387 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-42757 ID - vetulani-cęgiel2015 ER -Download
Wordbib
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" > <b:Source> <b:Tag>vetulani-cęgiel2015</b:Tag> <b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType> <b:Year>2015</b:Year> <b:PeriodicalTitle>JIPITEC</b:PeriodicalTitle> <b:Volume>6</b:Volume> <b:Issue>2</b:Issue> <b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-42757</b:Url> <b:Pages>146-162</b:Pages> <b:Author> <b:Author><b:NameList> <b:Person><b:Last>Vetulani-Cęgiel</b:Last><b:First>Agnieszka</b:First></b:Person> </b:NameList></b:Author> </b:Author> <b:Title>EU Copyright Law, Lobbying and Transparency of Policy-Making: The cases of sound recordings term extension and orphan works provisions</b:Title> <b:Comments>The objective of this paper is to discuss EU lobbying in the area of copyright. Legislation needs to regulate the legal position of various different stakeholders in a balanced manner. However, a number of EU copyright provisions brought into effect over recent years were highly controversial and have led to suggestions that powerful lobbying forces may have had some influence. This article investigates the effects of lobbying on copyright law-making in Europe. A specific comparative and multi-faceted analysis is provided of the legislative process for two recently adopted directives: 2011/77/EU which extends the term of protection of sound recordings and 2012/28/EU which introduces certain permitted uses of orphan works (some references are also made to the ACTA case). Firstly, a short presentation is given of the legal bases for the EU consultation process and lobbying. Next, an analysis is provided of the two cases, taking into consideration the policy-making procedures (with special focus on how the consultation process was handled), the legal solutions proposed and adopted and the various stakeholders’ claims. Lastly, it asks why some interest groups were successful and some others failed (the analysis identifies two types of factor for the effectiveness of lobbying: those resulting from stakeholders’ actions and those connected with the consultation process).</b:Comments> </b:Source> </b:Sources>Download
ISI
PT Journal AU Vetulani-Cęgiel, A TI EU Copyright Law, Lobbying and Transparency of Policy-Making: The cases of sound recordings term extension and orphan works provisions SO JIPITEC PY 2015 BP 146 EP 162 VL 6 IS 2 DE Consultation; Copyright; Interest Group; Law-Making; Library; Lobbying; Stakeholder; Music; Orphan Work; Phonogram; EU; Policy-Making; Sound Recording; Transparency AB The objective of this paper is to discuss EU lobbying in the area of copyright. Legislation needs to regulate the legal position of various different stakeholders in a balanced manner. However, a number of EU copyright provisions brought into effect over recent years were highly controversial and have led to suggestions that powerful lobbying forces may have had some influence. This article investigates the effects of lobbying on copyright law-making in Europe. A specific comparative and multi-faceted analysis is provided of the legislative process for two recently adopted directives: 2011/77/EU which extends the term of protection of sound recordings and 2012/28/EU which introduces certain permitted uses of orphan works (some references are also made to the ACTA case). Firstly, a short presentation is given of the legal bases for the EU consultation process and lobbying. Next, an analysis is provided of the two cases, taking into consideration the policy-making procedures (with special focus on how the consultation process was handled), the legal solutions proposed and adopted and the various stakeholders’ claims. Lastly, it asks why some interest groups were successful and some others failed (the analysis identifies two types of factor for the effectiveness of lobbying: those resulting from stakeholders’ actions and those connected with the consultation process). ERDownload
Mods
<mods>
<titleInfo>
<title>EU Copyright Law, Lobbying and Transparency of Policy-Making: The cases of sound recordings term extension and orphan works provisions</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="family">Vetulani-Cęgiel</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Agnieszka</namePart>
</name>
<abstract>The objective of this paper is to discuss EU lobbying in the area of copyright. Legislation needs to regulate the legal position of various different stakeholders in a balanced manner. However, a number of EU copyright provisions brought into effect over recent years were highly controversial and have led to suggestions that powerful lobbying forces may have had some influence. This article investigates the effects of lobbying on copyright law-making in Europe. A specific comparative and multi-faceted analysis is provided of the legislative process for two recently adopted directives: 2011/77/EU which extends the term of protection of sound recordings and 2012/28/EU which introduces certain permitted uses of orphan works (some references are also made to the ACTA case). Firstly, a short presentation is given of the legal bases for the EU consultation process and lobbying. Next, an analysis is provided of the two cases, taking into consideration the policy-making procedures (with special focus on how the consultation process was handled), the legal solutions proposed and adopted and the various stakeholders’ claims. Lastly, it asks why some interest groups were successful and some others failed (the analysis identifies two types of factor for the effectiveness of lobbying: those resulting from stakeholders’ actions and those connected with the consultation process).</abstract>
<subject>
<topic>Consultation</topic>
<topic>Copyright</topic>
<topic>Interest Group</topic>
<topic>Law-Making</topic>
<topic>Library</topic>
<topic>Lobbying; Stakeholder</topic>
<topic>Music</topic>
<topic>Orphan Work</topic>
<topic>Phonogram; EU</topic>
<topic>Policy-Making</topic>
<topic>Sound Recording</topic>
<topic>Transparency</topic>
</subject>
<classification authority="ddc">340</classification>
<relatedItem type="host">
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<genre>academic journal</genre>
<titleInfo>
<title>JIPITEC</title>
</titleInfo>
<part>
<detail type="volume">
<number>6</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<number>2</number>
</detail>
<date>2015</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>146</start>
<end>162</end>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier>
<identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-42757</identifier>
<identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-42757</identifier>
<identifier type="citekey">vetulani-cęgiel2015</identifier>
</mods>
Download
Full Metadata
| Bibliographic Citation | Journal of intellectual property, information technology and electronic commerce law 6 (2015) 2 |
|---|---|
| Title |
EU Copyright Law, Lobbying and Transparency of Policy-Making: The cases of sound recordings term extension and orphan works provisions (eng) |
| Author | Agnieszka Vetulani-Cęgiel |
| Language | eng |
| Abstract | The objective of this paper is to discuss EU lobbying in the area of copyright. Legislation needs to regulate the legal position of various different stakeholders in a balanced manner. However, a number of EU copyright provisions brought into effect over recent years were highly controversial and have led to suggestions that powerful lobbying forces may have had some influence. This article investigates the effects of lobbying on copyright law-making in Europe. A specific comparative and multi-faceted analysis is provided of the legislative process for two recently adopted directives: 2011/77/EU which extends the term of protection of sound recordings and 2012/28/EU which introduces certain permitted uses of orphan works (some references are also made to the ACTA case). Firstly, a short presentation is given of the legal bases for the EU consultation process and lobbying. Next, an analysis is provided of the two cases, taking into consideration the policy-making procedures (with special focus on how the consultation process was handled), the legal solutions proposed and adopted and the various stakeholders’ claims. Lastly, it asks why some interest groups were successful and some others failed (the analysis identifies two types of factor for the effectiveness of lobbying: those resulting from stakeholders’ actions and those connected with the consultation process). |
| Subject | Consultation, Copyright, Interest Group, Law-Making, Library, Lobbying; Stakeholder, Music, Orphan Work, Phonogram; EU, Policy-Making, Sound Recording, Transparency |
| DDC | 340 |
| Rights | DPPL |
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:0009-29-42757 |
