Document Actions

Citation and metadata

Recommended citation

Benedetta Ubertazzi, Infringement and Exclusive Jurisdiction in Intellectual Property: a Comparison for the International Law Association, 3 (2012) JIPITEC 227 para 1.

Download Citation

Endnote

%0 Journal Article
%T Infringement and Exclusive Jurisdiction in Intellectual Property: a  Comparison for the International Law Association
%A Ubertazzi, Benedetta
%J JIPITEC
%D 2012
%V 3
%N 3
%@ 2190-3387
%F ubertazzi2012
%X The following comparison was written for the first meeting of the International Law Association newly established (2010) Committee on Intellectual Property and Private International Law (Chair: Professor Toshiyuki Kono, Kyushu University; Co-Rapporteurs: Professors Pedro de Miguel Asensio, Madrid Complutense University, and Axel Metzger, Hannover University) (hereinafter: ILA Committee), which was hosted at the Faculty of Law of the University of Lisbon in March 16-17, 2012. The comparison at stake concerns the rules on infringement and exclusive (subject-mater) jurisdiction posed (or rejected, in case of exclusive jurisdiction) by four sets of academic principles. Notwithstanding the fact that the rules in question present several differences, those differences in the majority of cases could be overcome by further studies and work of the ILA Committee, as the following comparison explains.
%L 340
%K Exclusive (subject-matter) Jurisdiction
%K Infringement
%K Intellectual Property
%K Inter Partes Effects
%K Jurisdiction
%K Territoriality
%K Ubiquity
%K Validity
%U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-35191
%P 227-262

Download

Bibtex

@Article{ubertazzi2012,
  author = 	"Ubertazzi, Benedetta",
  title = 	"Infringement and Exclusive Jurisdiction in Intellectual Property: a  Comparison for the International Law Association",
  journal = 	"JIPITEC",
  year = 	"2012",
  volume = 	"3",
  number = 	"3",
  pages = 	"227--262",
  keywords = 	"Exclusive (subject-matter) Jurisdiction; Infringement; Intellectual Property; Inter Partes Effects; Jurisdiction; Territoriality; Ubiquity; Validity",
  abstract = 	"The following comparison was written for the first meeting of the International Law Association newly established (2010) Committee on Intellectual Property and Private International Law (Chair: Professor Toshiyuki Kono, Kyushu University; Co-Rapporteurs: Professors Pedro de Miguel Asensio, Madrid Complutense University, and Axel Metzger, Hannover University) (hereinafter: ILA Committee), which was hosted at the Faculty of Law of the University of Lisbon in March 16-17, 2012. The comparison at stake concerns the rules on infringement and exclusive (subject-mater) jurisdiction posed (or rejected, in case of exclusive jurisdiction) by four sets of academic principles. Notwithstanding the fact that the rules in question present several differences, those differences in the majority of cases could be overcome by further studies and work of the ILA Committee, as the following comparison explains.",
  issn = 	"2190-3387",
  url = 	"http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-35191"
}

Download

RIS

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ubertazzi, Benedetta
PY  - 2012
DA  - 2012//
TI  - Infringement and Exclusive Jurisdiction in Intellectual Property: a  Comparison for the International Law Association
JO  - JIPITEC
SP  - 227
EP  - 262
VL  - 3
IS  - 3
KW  - Exclusive (subject-matter) Jurisdiction
KW  - Infringement
KW  - Intellectual Property
KW  - Inter Partes Effects
KW  - Jurisdiction
KW  - Territoriality
KW  - Ubiquity
KW  - Validity
AB  - The following comparison was written for the first meeting of the International Law Association newly established (2010) Committee on Intellectual Property and Private International Law (Chair: Professor Toshiyuki Kono, Kyushu University; Co-Rapporteurs: Professors Pedro de Miguel Asensio, Madrid Complutense University, and Axel Metzger, Hannover University) (hereinafter: ILA Committee), which was hosted at the Faculty of Law of the University of Lisbon in March 16-17, 2012. The comparison at stake concerns the rules on infringement and exclusive (subject-mater) jurisdiction posed (or rejected, in case of exclusive jurisdiction) by four sets of academic principles. Notwithstanding the fact that the rules in question present several differences, those differences in the majority of cases could be overcome by further studies and work of the ILA Committee, as the following comparison explains.
SN  - 2190-3387
UR  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-35191
ID  - ubertazzi2012
ER  - 
Download

Wordbib

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography"  xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" >
<b:Source>
<b:Tag>ubertazzi2012</b:Tag>
<b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType>
<b:Year>2012</b:Year>
<b:PeriodicalTitle>JIPITEC</b:PeriodicalTitle>
<b:Volume>3</b:Volume>
<b:Issue>3</b:Issue>
<b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-35191</b:Url>
<b:Pages>227-262</b:Pages>
<b:Author>
<b:Author><b:NameList>
<b:Person><b:Last>Ubertazzi</b:Last><b:First>Benedetta</b:First></b:Person>
</b:NameList></b:Author>
</b:Author>
<b:Title>Infringement and Exclusive Jurisdiction in Intellectual Property: a  Comparison for the International Law Association</b:Title>
<b:Comments>The following comparison was written for the first meeting of the International Law Association newly established (2010) Committee on Intellectual Property and Private International Law (Chair: Professor Toshiyuki Kono, Kyushu University; Co-Rapporteurs: Professors Pedro de Miguel Asensio, Madrid Complutense University, and Axel Metzger, Hannover University) (hereinafter: ILA Committee), which was hosted at the Faculty of Law of the University of Lisbon in March 16-17, 2012. The comparison at stake concerns the rules on infringement and exclusive (subject-mater) jurisdiction posed (or rejected, in case of exclusive jurisdiction) by four sets of academic principles. Notwithstanding the fact that the rules in question present several differences, those differences in the majority of cases could be overcome by further studies and work of the ILA Committee, as the following comparison explains.</b:Comments>
</b:Source>
</b:Sources>
Download

ISI

PT Journal
AU Ubertazzi, B
TI Infringement and Exclusive Jurisdiction in Intellectual Property: a  Comparison for the International Law Association
SO JIPITEC
PY 2012
BP 227
EP 262
VL 3
IS 3
DE Exclusive (subject-matter) Jurisdiction; Infringement; Intellectual Property; Inter Partes Effects; Jurisdiction; Territoriality; Ubiquity; Validity
AB The following comparison was written for the first meeting of the International Law Association newly established (2010) Committee on Intellectual Property and Private International Law (Chair: Professor Toshiyuki Kono, Kyushu University; Co-Rapporteurs: Professors Pedro de Miguel Asensio, Madrid Complutense University, and Axel Metzger, Hannover University) (hereinafter: ILA Committee), which was hosted at the Faculty of Law of the University of Lisbon in March 16-17, 2012. The comparison at stake concerns the rules on infringement and exclusive (subject-mater) jurisdiction posed (or rejected, in case of exclusive jurisdiction) by four sets of academic principles. Notwithstanding the fact that the rules in question present several differences, those differences in the majority of cases could be overcome by further studies and work of the ILA Committee, as the following comparison explains.
ER

Download

Mods

<mods>
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Infringement and Exclusive Jurisdiction in Intellectual Property: a  Comparison for the International Law Association</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart type="family">Ubertazzi</namePart>
    <namePart type="given">Benedetta</namePart>
  </name>
  <abstract>The following comparison was written for the first meeting of the International Law Association newly established (2010) Committee on Intellectual Property and Private International Law (Chair: Professor Toshiyuki Kono, Kyushu University; Co-Rapporteurs: Professors Pedro de Miguel Asensio, Madrid Complutense University, and Axel Metzger, Hannover University) (hereinafter: ILA Committee), which was hosted at the Faculty of Law of the University of Lisbon in March 16-17, 2012. The comparison at stake concerns the rules on infringement and exclusive (subject-mater) jurisdiction posed (or rejected, in case of exclusive jurisdiction) by four sets of academic principles. Notwithstanding the fact that the rules in question present several differences, those differences in the majority of cases could be overcome by further studies and work of the ILA Committee, as the following comparison explains.</abstract>
  <subject>
    <topic>Exclusive (subject-matter) Jurisdiction</topic>
    <topic>Infringement</topic>
    <topic>Intellectual Property</topic>
    <topic>Inter Partes Effects</topic>
    <topic>Jurisdiction</topic>
    <topic>Territoriality</topic>
    <topic>Ubiquity</topic>
    <topic>Validity</topic>
  </subject>
  <classification authority="ddc">340</classification>
  <relatedItem type="host">
    <genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
    <genre>academic journal</genre>
    <titleInfo>
      <title>JIPITEC</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <part>
      <detail type="volume">
        <number>3</number>
      </detail>
      <detail type="issue">
        <number>3</number>
      </detail>
      <date>2012</date>
      <extent unit="page">
        <start>227</start>
        <end>262</end>
      </extent>
    </part>
  </relatedItem>
  <identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier>
  <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-35191</identifier>
  <identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-35191</identifier>
  <identifier type="citekey">ubertazzi2012</identifier>
</mods>
Download

Full Metadata

JIPITEC – Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law
Article search
Extended article search
Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter
Follow Us
twitter