Document Actions

Citation and metadata

Recommended citation

Maren K. Woebbeking, The Impact of Smart Contracts on Traditional Concepts of Contract Law, 10 (2019) JIPITEC 105 para 1.

Download Citation

Endnote

%0 Journal Article
%T The Impact of Smart Contracts on Traditional Concepts of Contract Law
%A Woebbeking, Maren K.
%J JIPITEC
%D 2019
%V 10
%N 1
%@ 2190-3387
%F woebbeking2019
%X The concept of smart contracts entered the legal discourse only a few years ago, yet the subject has already given rise to remarkably different approaches. While some assume that smart contracts can be fully integrated into existing contract law, others predict that they will mark the beginning of the end of contract law. The aim of this article is to contribute to the assessment of smart contracts by examining how they can be situated within the traditional Western concept of contract law and how they differ from traditional contracts in the individual phases of a contract’s life cycle. In particular, these findings show that the automated execution of the promises contained in a smart contract, specifically their technical characteristics, lead to an increased significance of the contract drafting phase compared to the execution phase. Among other aspects, smart contracts are considerably more difficult to modify than traditional contracts and they are limited by the fact that the encoding of contracts requires an increased formalization of the contractual terms. On the other hand, the technical architecture of smart contracts offers possibilities ranging from automatic self-help to the enforcement of legally unenforceable agreements. It is precisely this autonomy of smart contracts from existing contract law that finally raises the question of whether an adaptation of contract law will become necessary and what difficulties such an adaptation would face.
%L 340
%K Smart Contracts
%K code is law
%K contractual ambiguity
%K formalization of contracts
%K modifying smart contracts
%K regulation of cyberspace
%K self-execution of contracts
%U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-48800
%P 105-112

Download

Bibtex

@Article{woebbeking2019,
  author = 	"Woebbeking, Maren K.",
  title = 	"The Impact of Smart Contracts on Traditional Concepts of Contract Law",
  journal = 	"JIPITEC",
  year = 	"2019",
  volume = 	"10",
  number = 	"1",
  pages = 	"105--112",
  keywords = 	"Smart Contracts; code is law; contractual ambiguity; formalization of contracts; modifying smart contracts; regulation of cyberspace; self-execution of contracts",
  abstract = 	"The concept of smart contracts entered the legal discourse only a few years ago, yet the subject has already given rise to remarkably different approaches. While some assume that smart contracts can be fully integrated into existing contract law, others predict that they will mark the beginning of the end of contract law. The aim of this article is to contribute to the assessment of smart contracts by examining how they can be situated within the traditional Western concept of contract law and how they differ from traditional contracts in the individual phases of a contract's life cycle. In particular, these findings show that the automated execution of the promises contained in a smart contract, specifically their technical characteristics, lead to an increased significance of the contract drafting phase compared to the execution phase. Among other aspects, smart contracts are considerably more difficult to modify than traditional contracts and they are limited by the fact that the encoding of contracts requires an increased formalization of the contractual terms. On the other hand, the technical architecture of smart contracts offers possibilities ranging from automatic self-help to the enforcement of legally unenforceable agreements. It is precisely this autonomy of smart contracts from existing contract law that finally raises the question of whether an adaptation of contract law will become necessary and what difficulties such an adaptation would face.",
  issn = 	"2190-3387",
  url = 	"http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-48800"
}

Download

RIS

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Woebbeking, Maren K.
PY  - 2019
DA  - 2019//
TI  - The Impact of Smart Contracts on Traditional Concepts of Contract Law
JO  - JIPITEC
SP  - 105
EP  - 112
VL  - 10
IS  - 1
KW  - Smart Contracts
KW  - code is law
KW  - contractual ambiguity
KW  - formalization of contracts
KW  - modifying smart contracts
KW  - regulation of cyberspace
KW  - self-execution of contracts
AB  - The concept of smart contracts entered the legal discourse only a few years ago, yet the subject has already given rise to remarkably different approaches. While some assume that smart contracts can be fully integrated into existing contract law, others predict that they will mark the beginning of the end of contract law. The aim of this article is to contribute to the assessment of smart contracts by examining how they can be situated within the traditional Western concept of contract law and how they differ from traditional contracts in the individual phases of a contract’s life cycle. In particular, these findings show that the automated execution of the promises contained in a smart contract, specifically their technical characteristics, lead to an increased significance of the contract drafting phase compared to the execution phase. Among other aspects, smart contracts are considerably more difficult to modify than traditional contracts and they are limited by the fact that the encoding of contracts requires an increased formalization of the contractual terms. On the other hand, the technical architecture of smart contracts offers possibilities ranging from automatic self-help to the enforcement of legally unenforceable agreements. It is precisely this autonomy of smart contracts from existing contract law that finally raises the question of whether an adaptation of contract law will become necessary and what difficulties such an adaptation would face.
SN  - 2190-3387
UR  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-48800
ID  - woebbeking2019
ER  - 
Download

Wordbib

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography"  xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" >
<b:Source>
<b:Tag>woebbeking2019</b:Tag>
<b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType>
<b:Year>2019</b:Year>
<b:PeriodicalTitle>JIPITEC</b:PeriodicalTitle>
<b:Volume>10</b:Volume>
<b:Issue>1</b:Issue>
<b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-48800</b:Url>
<b:Pages>105-112</b:Pages>
<b:Author>
<b:Author><b:NameList>
<b:Person><b:Last>Woebbeking</b:Last><b:First>Maren K.</b:First></b:Person>
</b:NameList></b:Author>
</b:Author>
<b:Title>The Impact of Smart Contracts on Traditional Concepts of Contract Law</b:Title>
<b:Comments>The concept of smart contracts entered the legal discourse only a few years ago, yet the subject has already given rise to remarkably different approaches. While some assume that smart contracts can be fully integrated into existing contract law, others predict that they will mark the beginning of the end of contract law. The aim of this article is to contribute to the assessment of smart contracts by examining how they can be situated within the traditional Western concept of contract law and how they differ from traditional contracts in the individual phases of a contract’s life cycle. In particular, these findings show that the automated execution of the promises contained in a smart contract, specifically their technical characteristics, lead to an increased significance of the contract drafting phase compared to the execution phase. Among other aspects, smart contracts are considerably more difficult to modify than traditional contracts and they are limited by the fact that the encoding of contracts requires an increased formalization of the contractual terms. On the other hand, the technical architecture of smart contracts offers possibilities ranging from automatic self-help to the enforcement of legally unenforceable agreements. It is precisely this autonomy of smart contracts from existing contract law that finally raises the question of whether an adaptation of contract law will become necessary and what difficulties such an adaptation would face.</b:Comments>
</b:Source>
</b:Sources>
Download

ISI

PT Journal
AU Woebbeking, M
TI The Impact of Smart Contracts on Traditional Concepts of Contract Law
SO JIPITEC
PY 2019
BP 105
EP 112
VL 10
IS 1
DE Smart Contracts; code is law; contractual ambiguity; formalization of contracts; modifying smart contracts; regulation of cyberspace; self-execution of contracts
AB The concept of smart contracts entered the legal discourse only a few years ago, yet the subject has already given rise to remarkably different approaches. While some assume that smart contracts can be fully integrated into existing contract law, others predict that they will mark the beginning of the end of contract law. The aim of this article is to contribute to the assessment of smart contracts by examining how they can be situated within the traditional Western concept of contract law and how they differ from traditional contracts in the individual phases of a contract’s life cycle. In particular, these findings show that the automated execution of the promises contained in a smart contract, specifically their technical characteristics, lead to an increased significance of the contract drafting phase compared to the execution phase. Among other aspects, smart contracts are considerably more difficult to modify than traditional contracts and they are limited by the fact that the encoding of contracts requires an increased formalization of the contractual terms. On the other hand, the technical architecture of smart contracts offers possibilities ranging from automatic self-help to the enforcement of legally unenforceable agreements. It is precisely this autonomy of smart contracts from existing contract law that finally raises the question of whether an adaptation of contract law will become necessary and what difficulties such an adaptation would face.
ER

Download

Mods

<mods>
  <titleInfo>
    <title>The Impact of Smart Contracts on Traditional Concepts of Contract Law</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart type="family">Woebbeking</namePart>
    <namePart type="given">Maren K.</namePart>
  </name>
  <abstract>The concept of smart contracts entered the legal discourse only a few years ago, yet the subject has already given rise to remarkably different approaches. While some assume that smart contracts can be fully integrated into existing contract law, others predict that they will mark the beginning of the end of contract law. The aim of this article is to contribute to the assessment of smart contracts by examining how they can be situated within the traditional Western concept of contract law and how they differ from traditional contracts in the individual phases of a contract’s life cycle. In particular, these findings show that the automated execution of the promises contained in a smart contract, specifically their technical characteristics, lead to an increased significance of the contract drafting phase compared to the execution phase. Among other aspects, smart contracts are considerably more difficult to modify than traditional contracts and they are limited by the fact that the encoding of contracts requires an increased formalization of the contractual terms. On the other hand, the technical architecture of smart contracts offers possibilities ranging from automatic self-help to the enforcement of legally unenforceable agreements. It is precisely this autonomy of smart contracts from existing contract law that finally raises the question of whether an adaptation of contract law will become necessary and what difficulties such an adaptation would face.</abstract>
  <subject>
    <topic>Smart Contracts</topic>
    <topic>code is law</topic>
    <topic>contractual ambiguity</topic>
    <topic>formalization of contracts</topic>
    <topic>modifying smart contracts</topic>
    <topic>regulation of cyberspace</topic>
    <topic>self-execution of contracts</topic>
  </subject>
  <classification authority="ddc">340</classification>
  <relatedItem type="host">
    <genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
    <genre>academic journal</genre>
    <titleInfo>
      <title>JIPITEC</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <part>
      <detail type="volume">
        <number>10</number>
      </detail>
      <detail type="issue">
        <number>1</number>
      </detail>
      <date>2019</date>
      <extent unit="page">
        <start>105</start>
        <end>112</end>
      </extent>
    </part>
  </relatedItem>
  <identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier>
  <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-48800</identifier>
  <identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-48800</identifier>
  <identifier type="citekey">woebbeking2019</identifier>
</mods>
Download

Full Metadata

JIPITEC – Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law
Article search
Extended article search
Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter
Follow Us
twitter