Document Actions
Citation and metadata
Recommended citation
Benedetta Ubertazzi, Infringement and Exclusive Jurisdiction in Intellectual Property: a Comparison for the International Law Association, 3 (2012) JIPITEC 227 para 1.
Download Citation
Endnote
%0 Journal Article %T Infringement and Exclusive Jurisdiction in Intellectual Property: a Comparison for the International Law Association %A Ubertazzi, Benedetta %J JIPITEC %D 2012 %V 3 %N 3 %@ 2190-3387 %F ubertazzi2012 %X The following comparison was written for the first meeting of the International Law Association newly established (2010) Committee on Intellectual Property and Private International Law (Chair: Professor Toshiyuki Kono, Kyushu University; Co-Rapporteurs: Professors Pedro de Miguel Asensio, Madrid Complutense University, and Axel Metzger, Hannover University) (hereinafter: ILA Committee), which was hosted at the Faculty of Law of the University of Lisbon in March 16-17, 2012. The comparison at stake concerns the rules on infringement and exclusive (subject-mater) jurisdiction posed (or rejected, in case of exclusive jurisdiction) by four sets of academic principles. Notwithstanding the fact that the rules in question present several differences, those differences in the majority of cases could be overcome by further studies and work of the ILA Committee, as the following comparison explains. %L 340 %K Exclusive (subject-matter) Jurisdiction %K Infringement %K Intellectual Property %K Inter Partes Effects %K Jurisdiction %K Territoriality %K Ubiquity %K Validity %U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-35191 %P 227-262Download
Bibtex
@Article{ubertazzi2012,
author = "Ubertazzi, Benedetta",
title = "Infringement and Exclusive Jurisdiction in Intellectual Property: a Comparison for the International Law Association",
journal = "JIPITEC",
year = "2012",
volume = "3",
number = "3",
pages = "227--262",
keywords = "Exclusive (subject-matter) Jurisdiction; Infringement; Intellectual Property; Inter Partes Effects; Jurisdiction; Territoriality; Ubiquity; Validity",
abstract = "The following comparison was written for the first meeting of the International Law Association newly established (2010) Committee on Intellectual Property and Private International Law (Chair: Professor Toshiyuki Kono, Kyushu University; Co-Rapporteurs: Professors Pedro de Miguel Asensio, Madrid Complutense University, and Axel Metzger, Hannover University) (hereinafter: ILA Committee), which was hosted at the Faculty of Law of the University of Lisbon in March 16-17, 2012. The comparison at stake concerns the rules on infringement and exclusive (subject-mater) jurisdiction posed (or rejected, in case of exclusive jurisdiction) by four sets of academic principles. Notwithstanding the fact that the rules in question present several differences, those differences in the majority of cases could be overcome by further studies and work of the ILA Committee, as the following comparison explains.",
issn = "2190-3387",
url = "http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-35191"
}
Download
RIS
TY - JOUR AU - Ubertazzi, Benedetta PY - 2012 DA - 2012// TI - Infringement and Exclusive Jurisdiction in Intellectual Property: a Comparison for the International Law Association JO - JIPITEC SP - 227 EP - 262 VL - 3 IS - 3 KW - Exclusive (subject-matter) Jurisdiction KW - Infringement KW - Intellectual Property KW - Inter Partes Effects KW - Jurisdiction KW - Territoriality KW - Ubiquity KW - Validity AB - The following comparison was written for the first meeting of the International Law Association newly established (2010) Committee on Intellectual Property and Private International Law (Chair: Professor Toshiyuki Kono, Kyushu University; Co-Rapporteurs: Professors Pedro de Miguel Asensio, Madrid Complutense University, and Axel Metzger, Hannover University) (hereinafter: ILA Committee), which was hosted at the Faculty of Law of the University of Lisbon in March 16-17, 2012. The comparison at stake concerns the rules on infringement and exclusive (subject-mater) jurisdiction posed (or rejected, in case of exclusive jurisdiction) by four sets of academic principles. Notwithstanding the fact that the rules in question present several differences, those differences in the majority of cases could be overcome by further studies and work of the ILA Committee, as the following comparison explains. SN - 2190-3387 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-35191 ID - ubertazzi2012 ER -Download
Wordbib
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" > <b:Source> <b:Tag>ubertazzi2012</b:Tag> <b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType> <b:Year>2012</b:Year> <b:PeriodicalTitle>JIPITEC</b:PeriodicalTitle> <b:Volume>3</b:Volume> <b:Issue>3</b:Issue> <b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-35191</b:Url> <b:Pages>227-262</b:Pages> <b:Author> <b:Author><b:NameList> <b:Person><b:Last>Ubertazzi</b:Last><b:First>Benedetta</b:First></b:Person> </b:NameList></b:Author> </b:Author> <b:Title>Infringement and Exclusive Jurisdiction in Intellectual Property: a Comparison for the International Law Association</b:Title> <b:Comments>The following comparison was written for the first meeting of the International Law Association newly established (2010) Committee on Intellectual Property and Private International Law (Chair: Professor Toshiyuki Kono, Kyushu University; Co-Rapporteurs: Professors Pedro de Miguel Asensio, Madrid Complutense University, and Axel Metzger, Hannover University) (hereinafter: ILA Committee), which was hosted at the Faculty of Law of the University of Lisbon in March 16-17, 2012. The comparison at stake concerns the rules on infringement and exclusive (subject-mater) jurisdiction posed (or rejected, in case of exclusive jurisdiction) by four sets of academic principles. Notwithstanding the fact that the rules in question present several differences, those differences in the majority of cases could be overcome by further studies and work of the ILA Committee, as the following comparison explains.</b:Comments> </b:Source> </b:Sources>Download
ISI
PT Journal AU Ubertazzi, B TI Infringement and Exclusive Jurisdiction in Intellectual Property: a Comparison for the International Law Association SO JIPITEC PY 2012 BP 227 EP 262 VL 3 IS 3 DE Exclusive (subject-matter) Jurisdiction; Infringement; Intellectual Property; Inter Partes Effects; Jurisdiction; Territoriality; Ubiquity; Validity AB The following comparison was written for the first meeting of the International Law Association newly established (2010) Committee on Intellectual Property and Private International Law (Chair: Professor Toshiyuki Kono, Kyushu University; Co-Rapporteurs: Professors Pedro de Miguel Asensio, Madrid Complutense University, and Axel Metzger, Hannover University) (hereinafter: ILA Committee), which was hosted at the Faculty of Law of the University of Lisbon in March 16-17, 2012. The comparison at stake concerns the rules on infringement and exclusive (subject-mater) jurisdiction posed (or rejected, in case of exclusive jurisdiction) by four sets of academic principles. Notwithstanding the fact that the rules in question present several differences, those differences in the majority of cases could be overcome by further studies and work of the ILA Committee, as the following comparison explains. ERDownload
Mods
<mods>
<titleInfo>
<title>Infringement and Exclusive Jurisdiction in Intellectual Property: a Comparison for the International Law Association</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="family">Ubertazzi</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Benedetta</namePart>
</name>
<abstract>The following comparison was written for the first meeting of the International Law Association newly established (2010) Committee on Intellectual Property and Private International Law (Chair: Professor Toshiyuki Kono, Kyushu University; Co-Rapporteurs: Professors Pedro de Miguel Asensio, Madrid Complutense University, and Axel Metzger, Hannover University) (hereinafter: ILA Committee), which was hosted at the Faculty of Law of the University of Lisbon in March 16-17, 2012. The comparison at stake concerns the rules on infringement and exclusive (subject-mater) jurisdiction posed (or rejected, in case of exclusive jurisdiction) by four sets of academic principles. Notwithstanding the fact that the rules in question present several differences, those differences in the majority of cases could be overcome by further studies and work of the ILA Committee, as the following comparison explains.</abstract>
<subject>
<topic>Exclusive (subject-matter) Jurisdiction</topic>
<topic>Infringement</topic>
<topic>Intellectual Property</topic>
<topic>Inter Partes Effects</topic>
<topic>Jurisdiction</topic>
<topic>Territoriality</topic>
<topic>Ubiquity</topic>
<topic>Validity</topic>
</subject>
<classification authority="ddc">340</classification>
<relatedItem type="host">
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<genre>academic journal</genre>
<titleInfo>
<title>JIPITEC</title>
</titleInfo>
<part>
<detail type="volume">
<number>3</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<number>3</number>
</detail>
<date>2012</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>227</start>
<end>262</end>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier>
<identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-35191</identifier>
<identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-35191</identifier>
<identifier type="citekey">ubertazzi2012</identifier>
</mods>
Download
Full Metadata
| Bibliographic Citation | Journal of intellectual property, information technology and electronic commerce law 3 (2012) 3 |
|---|---|
| Title |
Infringement and Exclusive Jurisdiction in Intellectual Property: a Comparison for the International Law Association (eng) |
| Author | Benedetta Ubertazzi |
| Language | eng |
| Abstract | The following comparison was written for the first meeting of the International Law Association newly established (2010) Committee on Intellectual Property and Private International Law (Chair: Professor Toshiyuki Kono, Kyushu University; Co-Rapporteurs: Professors Pedro de Miguel Asensio, Madrid Complutense University, and Axel Metzger, Hannover University) (hereinafter: ILA Committee), which was hosted at the Faculty of Law of the University of Lisbon in March 16-17, 2012. The comparison at stake concerns the rules on infringement and exclusive (subject-mater) jurisdiction posed (or rejected, in case of exclusive jurisdiction) by four sets of academic principles. Notwithstanding the fact that the rules in question present several differences, those differences in the majority of cases could be overcome by further studies and work of the ILA Committee, as the following comparison explains. |
| Subject | Exclusive (subject-matter) Jurisdiction, Infringement, Intellectual Property, Inter Partes Effects, Jurisdiction, Territoriality, Ubiquity, Validity |
| DDC | 340 |
| Rights | DPPL |
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:0009-29-35191 |
