Individual Rights in the AI Act - The Rights to Lodge a Complaint and to Explanation of the Decision-Making Process in Individual Cases

Authors

Gerrit Hornung
Hendrik Link

Keywords:

AI and Fundamental Rights, Transparency, Explainability, Relationship between AI Act and GDPR

Abstract

While the Commission's draft AI Act virtually ignored the legal positions of individuals, the adopted text contains a much stronger focus on this aspect and introduces two new individual rights, namely the right to lodge a complaint (Article 85 AI Act) and the right to explanation (Article 86(1) AI Act). Given the relevance of many AI systems to fundamental rights, this is to be welcomed; however, its concrete implementation raises new questions both within the internal system of the AI Act and in relation to the GDPR.

Downloads

PDF

Published

2025-12-22

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 3 (2025): JIPITEC 16 (3)

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

Donatella Casaburo, Digital Advertising and the GDPR Identifying the (Joint) Controllers in the Real-Time Bidding Ecosystem , JIPITEC – Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law: Vol. 15 No. 3 (2024): JIPITEC 15 (3) 2024
Edoardo Celeste, Giovanni De Gregorio, Towards a Right to Digital Education? Constitutional Challenges of Edtech , JIPITEC – Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law: Vol. 14 No. 2 (2023): JIPITEC 14 (2) 2023
Toygar Hasan Oruç, The Prohibition of General Monitoring Obligation for Video-Sharing Platforms under Article 15 of the E-Commerce Directive in light of Recent Developments: Is it still necessary to maintain it? , JIPITEC – Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law: Vol. 13 No. 3 (2022): JIPITEC 13 (3) 2022
Evangelia Psychogiopoulou, Judicial Dialogue and Digitalization: CJEU Engagement with ECtHR Case Law and Fundamental Rights Standards in the EU , JIPITEC – Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law: Vol. 13 No. 2 (2022): JIPITEC 13 (2) 2022
Alain Strowel, Amandine Léonard, Cutting Back Patent Over-Enforcement – How to Address Abusive Practices Within the EU Enforcement Framework , JIPITEC – Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law: Vol. 11 No. 1 (2020): JIPITEC 11 (1) 2020
Thomas Dreier, GERMANY: Creating New Property Rights on the Basis of General Legal Concepts - Without Limits? , JIPITEC – Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law: Vol. 2 No. 2 (2011): JIPITEC 2 (2) 2011
Rolf H. Weber, On the Search for an Adequate Scope of the Right to Be Forgotten , JIPITEC – Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law: Vol. 6 No. 1 (2015): JIPITEC 6 (1) 2015
Roberto Caso, Maria Chiara Pievatolo, A liberal infrastructure in a neoliberal world: the Italian case of GARR , JIPITEC – Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law: Vol. 14 No. 2 (2023): JIPITEC 14 (2) 2023
Charis Tsigou, Notice-and-Takedown Procedure under Greek Intellectual Property Law 4481/2017 , JIPITEC – Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law: Vol. 9 No. 2 (2018): JIPITEC 9 (2) 2018
Marie-Elodie Ancel, Nicolas Binctin, Josef Drexl, Mireille van Eechoud, Jane C Ginsburg, Toshiyuki Kono, Gyooho Lee, Rita Matulionyte, Edouard Treppoz, Dário Moura Vicente, International Law Association’s Guidelines on Intellectual Property and Private International Law (“Kyoto Guidelines”): Applicable Law , JIPITEC – Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law: Vol. 12 No. 1 (2021): JIPITEC 12 (1) 2021

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >>

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.