Citation and metadata
Recommended citation
Bart van der Sloot, Sascha van Schendel, Ten Questions for Future Regulation of Big Data: A Comparative and Empirical Legal Study, 7 (2016) JIPITEC 110 para 1.
Download Citation
Endnote
%0 Journal Article %T Ten Questions for Future Regulation of Big Data: A Comparative and Empirical Legal Study %A van der Sloot, Bart %A van Schendel, Sascha %J JIPITEC %D 2016 %V 7 %N 2 %@ 2190-3387 %F van der sloot2016 %X Much has been written about Big Data from a technical, economical, juridical and ethical perspective. Still, very little empirical and comparative data is available on how Big Data is approached and regulated in Europe and beyond. This contribution makes a first effort to fill that gap by presenting the reactions to a survey on Big Data from the Data Protection Authorities of fourteen European countries and a comparative legal research of eleven countries. This contribution presents those results, addressing 10 challenges for the regulation of Big Data. %L 340 %K Big Data %K Comparative %K Comparative Legal Research %K Data Protection Authorities %K Empirical %K Survey %U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-44386 %P 110-145Download
Bibtex
@Article{vandersloot2016, author = "van der Sloot, Bart and van Schendel, Sascha", title = "Ten Questions for Future Regulation of Big Data: A Comparative and Empirical Legal Study", journal = "JIPITEC", year = "2016", volume = "7", number = "2", pages = "110--145", keywords = "Big Data; Comparative; Comparative Legal Research; Data Protection Authorities; Empirical; Survey", abstract = "Much has been written about Big Data from a technical, economical, juridical and ethical perspective. Still, very little empirical and comparative data is available on how Big Data is approached and regulated in Europe and beyond. This contribution makes a first effort to fill that gap by presenting the reactions to a survey on Big Data from the Data Protection Authorities of fourteen European countries and a comparative legal research of eleven countries. This contribution presents those results, addressing 10 challenges for the regulation of Big Data.", issn = "2190-3387", url = "http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-44386" }Download
RIS
TY - JOUR AU - van der Sloot, Bart AU - van Schendel, Sascha PY - 2016 DA - 2016// TI - Ten Questions for Future Regulation of Big Data: A Comparative and Empirical Legal Study JO - JIPITEC SP - 110 EP - 145 VL - 7 IS - 2 KW - Big Data KW - Comparative KW - Comparative Legal Research KW - Data Protection Authorities KW - Empirical KW - Survey AB - Much has been written about Big Data from a technical, economical, juridical and ethical perspective. Still, very little empirical and comparative data is available on how Big Data is approached and regulated in Europe and beyond. This contribution makes a first effort to fill that gap by presenting the reactions to a survey on Big Data from the Data Protection Authorities of fourteen European countries and a comparative legal research of eleven countries. This contribution presents those results, addressing 10 challenges for the regulation of Big Data. SN - 2190-3387 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-44386 ID - van der sloot2016 ER -Download
Wordbib
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" > <b:Source> <b:Tag>van der sloot2016</b:Tag> <b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType> <b:Year>2016</b:Year> <b:PeriodicalTitle>JIPITEC</b:PeriodicalTitle> <b:Volume>7</b:Volume> <b:Issue>2</b:Issue> <b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-44386</b:Url> <b:Pages>110-145</b:Pages> <b:Author> <b:Author><b:NameList> <b:Person><b:Last>van der Sloot</b:Last><b:First>Bart</b:First></b:Person> <b:Person><b:Last>van Schendel</b:Last><b:First>Sascha</b:First></b:Person> </b:NameList></b:Author> </b:Author> <b:Title>Ten Questions for Future Regulation of Big Data: A Comparative and Empirical Legal Study</b:Title> <b:Comments>Much has been written about Big Data from a technical, economical, juridical and ethical perspective. Still, very little empirical and comparative data is available on how Big Data is approached and regulated in Europe and beyond. This contribution makes a first effort to fill that gap by presenting the reactions to a survey on Big Data from the Data Protection Authorities of fourteen European countries and a comparative legal research of eleven countries. This contribution presents those results, addressing 10 challenges for the regulation of Big Data.</b:Comments> </b:Source> </b:Sources>Download
ISI
PT Journal AU van der Sloot, B van Schendel, S TI Ten Questions for Future Regulation of Big Data: A Comparative and Empirical Legal Study SO JIPITEC PY 2016 BP 110 EP 145 VL 7 IS 2 DE Big Data; Comparative; Comparative Legal Research; Data Protection Authorities; Empirical; Survey AB Much has been written about Big Data from a technical, economical, juridical and ethical perspective. Still, very little empirical and comparative data is available on how Big Data is approached and regulated in Europe and beyond. This contribution makes a first effort to fill that gap by presenting the reactions to a survey on Big Data from the Data Protection Authorities of fourteen European countries and a comparative legal research of eleven countries. This contribution presents those results, addressing 10 challenges for the regulation of Big Data. ERDownload
Mods
<mods> <titleInfo> <title>Ten Questions for Future Regulation of Big Data: A Comparative and Empirical Legal Study</title> </titleInfo> <name type="personal"> <namePart type="family">van der Sloot</namePart> <namePart type="given">Bart</namePart> </name> <name type="personal"> <namePart type="family">van Schendel</namePart> <namePart type="given">Sascha</namePart> </name> <abstract>Much has been written about Big Data from a technical, economical, juridical and ethical perspective. Still, very little empirical and comparative data is available on how Big Data is approached and regulated in Europe and beyond. This contribution makes a first effort to fill that gap by presenting the reactions to a survey on Big Data from the Data Protection Authorities of fourteen European countries and a comparative legal research of eleven countries. This contribution presents those results, addressing 10 challenges for the regulation of Big Data.</abstract> <subject> <topic>Big Data</topic> <topic>Comparative</topic> <topic>Comparative Legal Research</topic> <topic>Data Protection Authorities</topic> <topic>Empirical</topic> <topic>Survey</topic> </subject> <classification authority="ddc">340</classification> <relatedItem type="host"> <genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre> <genre>academic journal</genre> <titleInfo> <title>JIPITEC</title> </titleInfo> <part> <detail type="volume"> <number>7</number> </detail> <detail type="issue"> <number>2</number> </detail> <date>2016</date> <extent unit="page"> <start>110</start> <end>145</end> </extent> </part> </relatedItem> <identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier> <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-44386</identifier> <identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-44386</identifier> <identifier type="citekey">van der sloot2016</identifier> </mods>Download
Full Metadata
Bibliographic Citation | Journal of intellectual property, information technology and electronic commerce law 7 (2016) 2 |
---|---|
Title |
Ten Questions for Future Regulation of Big Data: A Comparative and Empirical Legal Study (eng) |
Author | Bart van der Sloot, Sascha van Schendel |
Language | eng |
Abstract | Much has been written about Big Data from a technical, economical, juridical and ethical perspective. Still, very little empirical and comparative data is available on how Big Data is approached and regulated in Europe and beyond. This contribution makes a first effort to fill that gap by presenting the reactions to a survey on Big Data from the Data Protection Authorities of fourteen European countries and a comparative legal research of eleven countries. This contribution presents those results, addressing 10 challenges for the regulation of Big Data. |
Subject | Big Data, Comparative, Comparative Legal Research, Data Protection Authorities, Empirical, Survey |
DDC | 340 |
Rights | DPPL |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:0009-29-44386 |