Document Actions
Citation and metadata
Recommended citation
Jonathan Griffiths, Proposals from Berlin and Paris – Intermediary Liability in European Copyright Law, 7 (2016) JIPITEC 70 para 1.
Download Citation
Endnote
%0 Journal Article %T Proposals from Berlin and Paris – Intermediary Liability in European Copyright Law %A Griffiths, Jonathan %J JIPITEC %D 2016 %V 7 %N 2 %@ 2190-3387 %F griffiths2016 %X Two very different proposals on copyright policy – one a privately drafted document, the other a governmental report – are published in this edition of JIPITEC. There is an interesting point of intersection between them because they both consider the difficult question of the liability of online intermediaries for users’ infringements. The first document is “The Berlin Gedankenexperiment on the Restructuring of Copyright Law and Authors Rights”. This is a wide-ranging proposal for a complete recasting of the legal system that promotes the production of, and controls the use of, creative goods. The second policy document has a more limited focus. The French High Council for Literary and Artistic Property (“CSPLA”)’s Mission to Link Directives 2000/31 and 2001/29 – Report and Proposals (“Mission Report”) aims to provide a persuasive intervention in current policy discussions at European Union level concerning the liability or, more appropriately, the non-liability, of online intermediaries for copyright infringement. In this brief introduction, I outline the scope of both proposals and reflect briefly on their recommendations. %L 340 %K Copyright Law %K Copyright Reform %K France %K French High Council for Literary and Artistic Property (CSPLA) %K Germany %K Intermediaries %U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-44348 %P 70-75Download
Bibtex
@Article{griffiths2016,
author = "Griffiths, Jonathan",
title = "Proposals from Berlin and Paris -- Intermediary Liability in European Copyright Law",
journal = "JIPITEC",
year = "2016",
volume = "7",
number = "2",
pages = "70--75",
keywords = "Copyright Law; Copyright Reform; France; French High Council for Literary and Artistic Property (CSPLA); Germany; Intermediaries",
abstract = "Two very different proposals on copyright policy -- one a privately drafted document, the other a governmental report -- are published in this edition of JIPITEC. There is an interesting point of intersection between them because they both consider the difficult question of the liability of online intermediaries for users' infringements. The first document is ``The Berlin Gedankenexperiment on the Restructuring of Copyright Law and Authors Rights''. This is a wide-ranging proposal for a complete recasting of the legal system that promotes the production of, and controls the use of, creative goods. The second policy document has a more limited focus. The French High Council for Literary and Artistic Property (``CSPLA'')'s Mission to Link Directives 2000/31 and 2001/29 -- Report and Proposals (``Mission Report'') aims to provide a persuasive intervention in current policy discussions at European Union level concerning the liability or, more appropriately, the non-liability, of online intermediaries for copyright infringement. In this brief introduction, I outline the scope of both proposals and reflect briefly on their recommendations.",
issn = "2190-3387",
url = "http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-44348"
}
Download
RIS
TY - JOUR AU - Griffiths, Jonathan PY - 2016 DA - 2016// TI - Proposals from Berlin and Paris – Intermediary Liability in European Copyright Law JO - JIPITEC SP - 70 EP - 75 VL - 7 IS - 2 KW - Copyright Law KW - Copyright Reform KW - France KW - French High Council for Literary and Artistic Property (CSPLA) KW - Germany KW - Intermediaries AB - Two very different proposals on copyright policy – one a privately drafted document, the other a governmental report – are published in this edition of JIPITEC. There is an interesting point of intersection between them because they both consider the difficult question of the liability of online intermediaries for users’ infringements. The first document is “The Berlin Gedankenexperiment on the Restructuring of Copyright Law and Authors Rights”. This is a wide-ranging proposal for a complete recasting of the legal system that promotes the production of, and controls the use of, creative goods. The second policy document has a more limited focus. The French High Council for Literary and Artistic Property (“CSPLA”)’s Mission to Link Directives 2000/31 and 2001/29 – Report and Proposals (“Mission Report”) aims to provide a persuasive intervention in current policy discussions at European Union level concerning the liability or, more appropriately, the non-liability, of online intermediaries for copyright infringement. In this brief introduction, I outline the scope of both proposals and reflect briefly on their recommendations. SN - 2190-3387 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-44348 ID - griffiths2016 ER -Download
Wordbib
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" > <b:Source> <b:Tag>griffiths2016</b:Tag> <b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType> <b:Year>2016</b:Year> <b:PeriodicalTitle>JIPITEC</b:PeriodicalTitle> <b:Volume>7</b:Volume> <b:Issue>2</b:Issue> <b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-44348</b:Url> <b:Pages>70-75</b:Pages> <b:Author> <b:Author><b:NameList> <b:Person><b:Last>Griffiths</b:Last><b:First>Jonathan</b:First></b:Person> </b:NameList></b:Author> </b:Author> <b:Title>Proposals from Berlin and Paris – Intermediary Liability in European Copyright Law</b:Title> <b:Comments>Two very different proposals on copyright policy – one a privately drafted document, the other a governmental report – are published in this edition of JIPITEC. There is an interesting point of intersection between them because they both consider the difficult question of the liability of online intermediaries for users’ infringements. The first document is “The Berlin Gedankenexperiment on the Restructuring of Copyright Law and Authors Rights”. This is a wide-ranging proposal for a complete recasting of the legal system that promotes the production of, and controls the use of, creative goods. The second policy document has a more limited focus. The French High Council for Literary and Artistic Property (“CSPLA”)’s Mission to Link Directives 2000/31 and 2001/29 – Report and Proposals (“Mission Report”) aims to provide a persuasive intervention in current policy discussions at European Union level concerning the liability or, more appropriately, the non-liability, of online intermediaries for copyright infringement. In this brief introduction, I outline the scope of both proposals and reflect briefly on their recommendations.</b:Comments> </b:Source> </b:Sources>Download
ISI
PT Journal AU Griffiths, J TI Proposals from Berlin and Paris – Intermediary Liability in European Copyright Law SO JIPITEC PY 2016 BP 70 EP 75 VL 7 IS 2 DE Copyright Law; Copyright Reform; France; French High Council for Literary and Artistic Property (CSPLA); Germany; Intermediaries AB Two very different proposals on copyright policy – one a privately drafted document, the other a governmental report – are published in this edition of JIPITEC. There is an interesting point of intersection between them because they both consider the difficult question of the liability of online intermediaries for users’ infringements. The first document is “The Berlin Gedankenexperiment on the Restructuring of Copyright Law and Authors Rights”. This is a wide-ranging proposal for a complete recasting of the legal system that promotes the production of, and controls the use of, creative goods. The second policy document has a more limited focus. The French High Council for Literary and Artistic Property (“CSPLA”)’s Mission to Link Directives 2000/31 and 2001/29 – Report and Proposals (“Mission Report”) aims to provide a persuasive intervention in current policy discussions at European Union level concerning the liability or, more appropriately, the non-liability, of online intermediaries for copyright infringement. In this brief introduction, I outline the scope of both proposals and reflect briefly on their recommendations. ERDownload
Mods
<mods>
<titleInfo>
<title>Proposals from Berlin and Paris – Intermediary Liability in European Copyright Law</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="family">Griffiths</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Jonathan</namePart>
</name>
<abstract>Two very different proposals on copyright policy – one a privately drafted document, the other a governmental report – are published in this edition of JIPITEC. There is an interesting point of intersection between them because they both consider the difficult question of the liability of online intermediaries for users’ infringements. The first document is “The Berlin Gedankenexperiment on the Restructuring of Copyright Law and Authors Rights”. This is a wide-ranging proposal for a complete recasting of the legal system that promotes the production of, and controls the use of, creative goods. The second policy document has a more limited focus. The French High Council for Literary and Artistic Property (“CSPLA”)’s Mission to Link Directives 2000/31 and 2001/29 – Report and Proposals (“Mission Report”) aims to provide a persuasive intervention in current policy discussions at European Union level concerning the liability or, more appropriately, the non-liability, of online intermediaries for copyright infringement. In this brief introduction, I outline the scope of both proposals and reflect briefly on their recommendations.</abstract>
<subject>
<topic>Copyright Law</topic>
<topic>Copyright Reform</topic>
<topic>France</topic>
<topic>French High Council for Literary and Artistic Property (CSPLA)</topic>
<topic>Germany</topic>
<topic>Intermediaries</topic>
</subject>
<classification authority="ddc">340</classification>
<relatedItem type="host">
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<genre>academic journal</genre>
<titleInfo>
<title>JIPITEC</title>
</titleInfo>
<part>
<detail type="volume">
<number>7</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<number>2</number>
</detail>
<date>2016</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>70</start>
<end>75</end>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier>
<identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-44348</identifier>
<identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-44348</identifier>
<identifier type="citekey">griffiths2016</identifier>
</mods>
Download
Full Metadata
| Bibliographic Citation | Journal of intellectual property, information technology and electronic commerce law 7 (2016) 2 |
|---|---|
| Title |
Proposals from Berlin and Paris – Intermediary Liability in European Copyright Law (eng) |
| Author | Jonathan Griffiths |
| Language | eng |
| Abstract | Two very different proposals on copyright policy – one a privately drafted document, the other a governmental report – are published in this edition of JIPITEC. There is an interesting point of intersection between them because they both consider the difficult question of the liability of online intermediaries for users’ infringements. The first document is “The Berlin Gedankenexperiment on the Restructuring of Copyright Law and Authors Rights”. This is a wide-ranging proposal for a complete recasting of the legal system that promotes the production of, and controls the use of, creative goods. The second policy document has a more limited focus. The French High Council for Literary and Artistic Property (“CSPLA”)’s Mission to Link Directives 2000/31 and 2001/29 – Report and Proposals (“Mission Report”) aims to provide a persuasive intervention in current policy discussions at European Union level concerning the liability or, more appropriately, the non-liability, of online intermediaries for copyright infringement. In this brief introduction, I outline the scope of both proposals and reflect briefly on their recommendations. |
| Subject | Copyright Law, Copyright Reform, France, French High Council for Literary and Artistic Property (CSPLA), Germany, Intermediaries |
| DDC | 340 |
| Rights | DPPL |
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:0009-29-44348 |
