Document Actions
Citation and metadata
Recommended citation
Katarzyna Klafkowska-Waśniowska, Under One Umbrella: Problems of Internet Retransmissions of Broadcasts and Implications for New Audiovisual Content Services, 6 (2015) JIPITEC 86 para 1.
Download Citation
Endnote
%0 Journal Article %T Under One Umbrella: Problems of Internet Retransmissions of Broadcasts and Implications for New Audiovisual Content Services %A Klafkowska-Waśniowska, Katarzyna %J JIPITEC %D 2015 %V 6 %N 1 %@ 2190-3387 %F klafkowska-waśniowska2015 %X The development of broadband Internet connections has fostered new audiovisual media services and opened new possibilities for accessing broadcasts. The Internet retransmission case of TVCatchup before the CJEU was the first case concerning new technologies in the light of Art. 3.1. of the Information Society Directive. On the other side of the Atlantic the Aereo case reached the U.S. Supreme Court and challenged the interpretation of public performance rights. In both cases the recipients of the services could receive broadcast programs in a way alternative to traditional broadcasting channels including terrestrial broadcasting or cable transmission. The Aereo case raised the debate on the possible impact of the interpretation of copyright law in the context of the development of new technologies, particularly cloud based services. It is interesting to see whether any similar problems occur in the EU. The „umbrella” in the title refers to Art. 8 WCT, which covers digital and Internet transmission and constitutes the backrgound for the EU and the U.S. legal solutions. The article argues that no international standard for qualification of the discussed services exists. %L 340 %K Audiovisual Media Services %K CJEU %K InfoSoc %K Right to make available to the Public %K WCT %U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-44112 %P 86-97Download
Bibtex
@Article{klafkowska-waśniowska2015,
author = "Klafkowska-Wa{\'{s}}niowska, Katarzyna",
title = "Under One Umbrella: Problems of Internet Retransmissions of Broadcasts and Implications for New Audiovisual Content Services",
journal = "JIPITEC",
year = "2015",
volume = "6",
number = "1",
pages = "86--97",
keywords = "Audiovisual Media Services; CJEU; InfoSoc; Right to make available to the Public; WCT",
abstract = "The development of broadband Internet connections has fostered new audiovisual media services and opened new possibilities for accessing broadcasts. The Internet retransmission case of TVCatchup before the CJEU was the first case concerning new technologies in the light of Art. 3.1. of the Information Society Directive. On the other side of the Atlantic the Aereo case reached the U.S. Supreme Court and challenged the interpretation of public performance rights. In both cases the recipients of the services could receive broadcast programs in a way alternative to traditional broadcasting channels including terrestrial broadcasting or cable transmission. The Aereo case raised the debate on the possible impact of the interpretation of copyright law in the context of the development of new technologies, particularly cloud based services. It is interesting to see whether any similar problems occur in the EU. The „umbrella'' in the title refers to Art. 8 WCT, which covers digital and Internet transmission and constitutes the backrgound for the EU and the U.S. legal solutions. The article argues that no international standard for qualification of the discussed services exists.",
issn = "2190-3387",
url = "http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-44112"
}
Download
RIS
TY - JOUR AU - Klafkowska-Waśniowska, Katarzyna PY - 2015 DA - 2015// TI - Under One Umbrella: Problems of Internet Retransmissions of Broadcasts and Implications for New Audiovisual Content Services JO - JIPITEC SP - 86 EP - 97 VL - 6 IS - 1 KW - Audiovisual Media Services KW - CJEU KW - InfoSoc KW - Right to make available to the Public KW - WCT AB - The development of broadband Internet connections has fostered new audiovisual media services and opened new possibilities for accessing broadcasts. The Internet retransmission case of TVCatchup before the CJEU was the first case concerning new technologies in the light of Art. 3.1. of the Information Society Directive. On the other side of the Atlantic the Aereo case reached the U.S. Supreme Court and challenged the interpretation of public performance rights. In both cases the recipients of the services could receive broadcast programs in a way alternative to traditional broadcasting channels including terrestrial broadcasting or cable transmission. The Aereo case raised the debate on the possible impact of the interpretation of copyright law in the context of the development of new technologies, particularly cloud based services. It is interesting to see whether any similar problems occur in the EU. The „umbrella” in the title refers to Art. 8 WCT, which covers digital and Internet transmission and constitutes the backrgound for the EU and the U.S. legal solutions. The article argues that no international standard for qualification of the discussed services exists. SN - 2190-3387 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-44112 ID - klafkowska-waśniowska2015 ER -Download
Wordbib
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" > <b:Source> <b:Tag>klafkowska-waśniowska2015</b:Tag> <b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType> <b:Year>2015</b:Year> <b:PeriodicalTitle>JIPITEC</b:PeriodicalTitle> <b:Volume>6</b:Volume> <b:Issue>1</b:Issue> <b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-44112</b:Url> <b:Pages>86-97</b:Pages> <b:Author> <b:Author><b:NameList> <b:Person><b:Last>Klafkowska-Waśniowska</b:Last><b:First>Katarzyna</b:First></b:Person> </b:NameList></b:Author> </b:Author> <b:Title>Under One Umbrella: Problems of Internet Retransmissions of Broadcasts and Implications for New Audiovisual Content Services</b:Title> <b:Comments>The development of broadband Internet connections has fostered new audiovisual media services and opened new possibilities for accessing broadcasts. The Internet retransmission case of TVCatchup before the CJEU was the first case concerning new technologies in the light of Art. 3.1. of the Information Society Directive. On the other side of the Atlantic the Aereo case reached the U.S. Supreme Court and challenged the interpretation of public performance rights. In both cases the recipients of the services could receive broadcast programs in a way alternative to traditional broadcasting channels including terrestrial broadcasting or cable transmission. The Aereo case raised the debate on the possible impact of the interpretation of copyright law in the context of the development of new technologies, particularly cloud based services. It is interesting to see whether any similar problems occur in the EU. The „umbrella” in the title refers to Art. 8 WCT, which covers digital and Internet transmission and constitutes the backrgound for the EU and the U.S. legal solutions. The article argues that no international standard for qualification of the discussed services exists.</b:Comments> </b:Source> </b:Sources>Download
ISI
PT Journal AU Klafkowska-Waśniowska, K TI Under One Umbrella: Problems of Internet Retransmissions of Broadcasts and Implications for New Audiovisual Content Services SO JIPITEC PY 2015 BP 86 EP 97 VL 6 IS 1 DE Audiovisual Media Services; CJEU; InfoSoc; Right to make available to the Public; WCT AB The development of broadband Internet connections has fostered new audiovisual media services and opened new possibilities for accessing broadcasts. The Internet retransmission case of TVCatchup before the CJEU was the first case concerning new technologies in the light of Art. 3.1. of the Information Society Directive. On the other side of the Atlantic the Aereo case reached the U.S. Supreme Court and challenged the interpretation of public performance rights. In both cases the recipients of the services could receive broadcast programs in a way alternative to traditional broadcasting channels including terrestrial broadcasting or cable transmission. The Aereo case raised the debate on the possible impact of the interpretation of copyright law in the context of the development of new technologies, particularly cloud based services. It is interesting to see whether any similar problems occur in the EU. The „umbrella” in the title refers to Art. 8 WCT, which covers digital and Internet transmission and constitutes the backrgound for the EU and the U.S. legal solutions. The article argues that no international standard for qualification of the discussed services exists. ERDownload
Mods
<mods>
<titleInfo>
<title>Under One Umbrella: Problems of Internet Retransmissions of Broadcasts and Implications for New Audiovisual Content Services</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="family">Klafkowska-Waśniowska</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Katarzyna</namePart>
</name>
<abstract>The development of broadband Internet connections has fostered new audiovisual media services and opened new possibilities for accessing broadcasts. The Internet retransmission case of TVCatchup before the CJEU was the first case concerning new technologies in the light of Art. 3.1. of the Information Society Directive. On the other side of the Atlantic the Aereo case reached the U.S. Supreme Court and challenged the interpretation of public performance rights. In both cases the recipients of the services could receive broadcast programs in a way alternative to traditional broadcasting channels including terrestrial broadcasting or cable transmission. The Aereo case raised the debate on the possible impact of the interpretation of copyright law in the context of the development of new technologies, particularly cloud based services. It is interesting to see whether any similar problems occur in the EU. The „umbrella” in the title refers to Art. 8 WCT, which covers digital and Internet transmission and constitutes the backrgound for the EU and the U.S. legal solutions. The article argues that no international standard for qualification of the discussed services exists.</abstract>
<subject>
<topic>Audiovisual Media Services</topic>
<topic>CJEU</topic>
<topic>InfoSoc</topic>
<topic>Right to make available to the Public</topic>
<topic>WCT</topic>
</subject>
<classification authority="ddc">340</classification>
<relatedItem type="host">
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<genre>academic journal</genre>
<titleInfo>
<title>JIPITEC</title>
</titleInfo>
<part>
<detail type="volume">
<number>6</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<number>1</number>
</detail>
<date>2015</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>86</start>
<end>97</end>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier>
<identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-44112</identifier>
<identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-44112</identifier>
<identifier type="citekey">klafkowska-waśniowska2015</identifier>
</mods>
Download
Full Metadata
| Bibliographic Citation | Journal of intellectual property, information technology and electronic commerce law 6 (2015) 1 |
|---|---|
| Title |
Under One Umbrella: Problems of Internet Retransmissions of Broadcasts and Implications for New Audiovisual Content Services (eng) |
| Author | Katarzyna Klafkowska-Waśniowska |
| Language | eng |
| Abstract | The development of broadband Internet connections has fostered new audiovisual media services and opened new possibilities for accessing broadcasts. The Internet retransmission case of TVCatchup before the CJEU was the first case concerning new technologies in the light of Art. 3.1. of the Information Society Directive. On the other side of the Atlantic the Aereo case reached the U.S. Supreme Court and challenged the interpretation of public performance rights. In both cases the recipients of the services could receive broadcast programs in a way alternative to traditional broadcasting channels including terrestrial broadcasting or cable transmission. The Aereo case raised the debate on the possible impact of the interpretation of copyright law in the context of the development of new technologies, particularly cloud based services. It is interesting to see whether any similar problems occur in the EU. The „umbrella” in the title refers to Art. 8 WCT, which covers digital and Internet transmission and constitutes the backrgound for the EU and the U.S. legal solutions. The article argues that no international standard for qualification of the discussed services exists. |
| Subject | Audiovisual Media Services, CJEU, InfoSoc, Right to make available to the Public, WCT |
| DDC | 340 |
| Rights | DPPL |
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:0009-29-44112 |
