Document Actions

Citation and metadata

Recommended citation

Rita Matulionytė, Lankauskas Mindaugas, Bittorent Loses Again: A Recent Lithuanian BitTorrent Case and What It Means for the Construction of the E-commerce Directive, 4 (2013) JIPITEC 179 para 1.

Download Citation

Endnote

%0 Journal Article
%T Bittorent Loses Again: A Recent Lithuanian BitTorrent Case and What It Means for the Construction of the E-commerce Directive
%A Matulionytė, Rita
%A Mindaugas, Lankauskas
%J JIPITEC
%D 2013
%V 4
%N 3
%@ 2190-3387
%F matulionytė2013
%X This article first discusses a recent Lithuanian BitTorrent case, Linkomanija, with its shortcomings and perspectives. It then compares the outcomes of the Lithuanian case with recent court practice in Scandinavian countries (the Swedish Pirate Bay and Finnish Finreactor cases). Finally, it poses some questions as to whether BitTorrent sites should be qualified as hosting services under Article 14 of the EU E-commerce Directive (2000/31/EC) and whether the application of the limited liability standard, as developed by the Court of Justice of the European Union, would be reasonable for BitTorrent file-sharing services in general.
%L 340
%K BitTorrent
%K E-commerce Directive
%K File Sharing
%K Finland
%K Finreactor
%K Hosting
%K Intermediary Liability
%K Internet Service Provider
%K Linkomanija
%K Lithuania
%K Pirate Bay
%K Sweden
%U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-38430
%P 179-189

Download

Bibtex

@Article{matulionytė2013,
  author = 	"Matulionyt{\.{e}}, Rita
		and Mindaugas, Lankauskas",
  title = 	"Bittorent Loses Again: A Recent Lithuanian BitTorrent Case and What It Means for the Construction of the E-commerce Directive",
  journal = 	"JIPITEC",
  year = 	"2013",
  volume = 	"4",
  number = 	"3",
  pages = 	"179--189",
  keywords = 	"BitTorrent; E-commerce Directive; File Sharing; Finland; Finreactor; Hosting; Intermediary Liability; Internet Service Provider; Linkomanija; Lithuania; Pirate Bay; Sweden",
  abstract = 	"This article first discusses a recent Lithuanian BitTorrent case, Linkomanija, with its shortcomings and perspectives. It then compares the outcomes of the Lithuanian case with recent court practice in Scandinavian countries (the Swedish Pirate Bay and Finnish Finreactor cases). Finally, it poses some questions as to whether BitTorrent sites should be qualified as hosting services under Article 14 of the EU E-commerce Directive (2000/31/EC) and whether the application of the limited liability standard, as developed by the Court of Justice of the European Union, would be reasonable for BitTorrent file-sharing services in general.",
  issn = 	"2190-3387",
  url = 	"http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-38430"
}

Download

RIS

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Matulionytė, Rita
AU  - Mindaugas, Lankauskas
PY  - 2013
DA  - 2013//
TI  - Bittorent Loses Again: A Recent Lithuanian BitTorrent Case and What It Means for the Construction of the E-commerce Directive
JO  - JIPITEC
SP  - 179
EP  - 189
VL  - 4
IS  - 3
KW  - BitTorrent
KW  - E-commerce Directive
KW  - File Sharing
KW  - Finland
KW  - Finreactor
KW  - Hosting
KW  - Intermediary Liability
KW  - Internet Service Provider
KW  - Linkomanija
KW  - Lithuania
KW  - Pirate Bay
KW  - Sweden
AB  - This article first discusses a recent Lithuanian BitTorrent case, Linkomanija, with its shortcomings and perspectives. It then compares the outcomes of the Lithuanian case with recent court practice in Scandinavian countries (the Swedish Pirate Bay and Finnish Finreactor cases). Finally, it poses some questions as to whether BitTorrent sites should be qualified as hosting services under Article 14 of the EU E-commerce Directive (2000/31/EC) and whether the application of the limited liability standard, as developed by the Court of Justice of the European Union, would be reasonable for BitTorrent file-sharing services in general.
SN  - 2190-3387
UR  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-38430
ID  - matulionytė2013
ER  - 
Download

Wordbib

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography"  xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" >
<b:Source>
<b:Tag>matulionytė2013</b:Tag>
<b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType>
<b:Year>2013</b:Year>
<b:PeriodicalTitle>JIPITEC</b:PeriodicalTitle>
<b:Volume>4</b:Volume>
<b:Issue>3</b:Issue>
<b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-38430</b:Url>
<b:Pages>179-189</b:Pages>
<b:Author>
<b:Author><b:NameList>
<b:Person><b:Last>Matulionytė</b:Last><b:First>Rita</b:First></b:Person>
<b:Person><b:Last>Mindaugas</b:Last><b:First>Lankauskas</b:First></b:Person>
</b:NameList></b:Author>
</b:Author>
<b:Title>Bittorent Loses Again: A Recent Lithuanian BitTorrent Case and What It Means for the Construction of the E-commerce Directive</b:Title>
<b:Comments>This article first discusses a recent Lithuanian BitTorrent case, Linkomanija, with its shortcomings and perspectives. It then compares the outcomes of the Lithuanian case with recent court practice in Scandinavian countries (the Swedish Pirate Bay and Finnish Finreactor cases). Finally, it poses some questions as to whether BitTorrent sites should be qualified as hosting services under Article 14 of the EU E-commerce Directive (2000/31/EC) and whether the application of the limited liability standard, as developed by the Court of Justice of the European Union, would be reasonable for BitTorrent file-sharing services in general.</b:Comments>
</b:Source>
</b:Sources>
Download

ISI

PT Journal
AU Matulionytė, R
   Mindaugas, L
TI Bittorent Loses Again: A Recent Lithuanian BitTorrent Case and What It Means for the Construction of the E-commerce Directive
SO JIPITEC
PY 2013
BP 179
EP 189
VL 4
IS 3
DE BitTorrent; E-commerce Directive; File Sharing; Finland; Finreactor; Hosting; Intermediary Liability; Internet Service Provider; Linkomanija; Lithuania; Pirate Bay; Sweden
AB This article first discusses a recent Lithuanian BitTorrent case, Linkomanija, with its shortcomings and perspectives. It then compares the outcomes of the Lithuanian case with recent court practice in Scandinavian countries (the Swedish Pirate Bay and Finnish Finreactor cases). Finally, it poses some questions as to whether BitTorrent sites should be qualified as hosting services under Article 14 of the EU E-commerce Directive (2000/31/EC) and whether the application of the limited liability standard, as developed by the Court of Justice of the European Union, would be reasonable for BitTorrent file-sharing services in general.
ER

Download

Mods

<mods>
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Bittorent Loses Again: A Recent Lithuanian BitTorrent Case and What It Means for the Construction of the E-commerce Directive</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart type="family">Matulionytė</namePart>
    <namePart type="given">Rita</namePart>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart type="family">Mindaugas</namePart>
    <namePart type="given">Lankauskas</namePart>
  </name>
  <abstract>This article first discusses a recent Lithuanian BitTorrent case, Linkomanija, with its shortcomings and perspectives. It then compares the outcomes of the Lithuanian case with recent court practice in Scandinavian countries (the Swedish Pirate Bay and Finnish Finreactor cases). Finally, it poses some questions as to whether BitTorrent sites should be qualified as hosting services under Article 14 of the EU E-commerce Directive (2000/31/EC) and whether the application of the limited liability standard, as developed by the Court of Justice of the European Union, would be reasonable for BitTorrent file-sharing services in general.</abstract>
  <subject>
    <topic>BitTorrent</topic>
    <topic>E-commerce Directive</topic>
    <topic>File Sharing</topic>
    <topic>Finland</topic>
    <topic>Finreactor</topic>
    <topic>Hosting</topic>
    <topic>Intermediary Liability</topic>
    <topic>Internet Service Provider</topic>
    <topic>Linkomanija</topic>
    <topic>Lithuania</topic>
    <topic>Pirate Bay</topic>
    <topic>Sweden</topic>
  </subject>
  <classification authority="ddc">340</classification>
  <relatedItem type="host">
    <genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
    <genre>academic journal</genre>
    <titleInfo>
      <title>JIPITEC</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <part>
      <detail type="volume">
        <number>4</number>
      </detail>
      <detail type="issue">
        <number>3</number>
      </detail>
      <date>2013</date>
      <extent unit="page">
        <start>179</start>
        <end>189</end>
      </extent>
    </part>
  </relatedItem>
  <identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier>
  <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-38430</identifier>
  <identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-38430</identifier>
  <identifier type="citekey">matulionytė2013</identifier>
</mods>
Download

Full Metadata

JIPITEC – Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law
Article search
Extended article search
Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter
Follow Us
twitter