Citation and metadata
Recommended citation
Rita Matulionytė, Lankauskas Mindaugas, Bittorent Loses Again: A Recent Lithuanian BitTorrent Case and What It Means for the Construction of the E-commerce Directive, 4 (2013) JIPITEC 179 para 1.
Download Citation
Endnote
%0 Journal Article %T Bittorent Loses Again: A Recent Lithuanian BitTorrent Case and What It Means for the Construction of the E-commerce Directive %A Matulionytė, Rita %A Mindaugas, Lankauskas %J JIPITEC %D 2013 %V 4 %N 3 %@ 2190-3387 %F matulionytė2013 %X This article first discusses a recent Lithuanian BitTorrent case, Linkomanija, with its shortcomings and perspectives. It then compares the outcomes of the Lithuanian case with recent court practice in Scandinavian countries (the Swedish Pirate Bay and Finnish Finreactor cases). Finally, it poses some questions as to whether BitTorrent sites should be qualified as hosting services under Article 14 of the EU E-commerce Directive (2000/31/EC) and whether the application of the limited liability standard, as developed by the Court of Justice of the European Union, would be reasonable for BitTorrent file-sharing services in general. %L 340 %K BitTorrent %K E-commerce Directive %K File Sharing %K Finland %K Finreactor %K Hosting %K Intermediary Liability %K Internet Service Provider %K Linkomanija %K Lithuania %K Pirate Bay %K Sweden %U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-38430 %P 179-189Download
Bibtex
@Article{matulionytė2013, author = "Matulionyt{\.{e}}, Rita and Mindaugas, Lankauskas", title = "Bittorent Loses Again: A Recent Lithuanian BitTorrent Case and What It Means for the Construction of the E-commerce Directive", journal = "JIPITEC", year = "2013", volume = "4", number = "3", pages = "179--189", keywords = "BitTorrent; E-commerce Directive; File Sharing; Finland; Finreactor; Hosting; Intermediary Liability; Internet Service Provider; Linkomanija; Lithuania; Pirate Bay; Sweden", abstract = "This article first discusses a recent Lithuanian BitTorrent case, Linkomanija, with its shortcomings and perspectives. It then compares the outcomes of the Lithuanian case with recent court practice in Scandinavian countries (the Swedish Pirate Bay and Finnish Finreactor cases). Finally, it poses some questions as to whether BitTorrent sites should be qualified as hosting services under Article 14 of the EU E-commerce Directive (2000/31/EC) and whether the application of the limited liability standard, as developed by the Court of Justice of the European Union, would be reasonable for BitTorrent file-sharing services in general.", issn = "2190-3387", url = "http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-38430" }Download
RIS
TY - JOUR AU - Matulionytė, Rita AU - Mindaugas, Lankauskas PY - 2013 DA - 2013// TI - Bittorent Loses Again: A Recent Lithuanian BitTorrent Case and What It Means for the Construction of the E-commerce Directive JO - JIPITEC SP - 179 EP - 189 VL - 4 IS - 3 KW - BitTorrent KW - E-commerce Directive KW - File Sharing KW - Finland KW - Finreactor KW - Hosting KW - Intermediary Liability KW - Internet Service Provider KW - Linkomanija KW - Lithuania KW - Pirate Bay KW - Sweden AB - This article first discusses a recent Lithuanian BitTorrent case, Linkomanija, with its shortcomings and perspectives. It then compares the outcomes of the Lithuanian case with recent court practice in Scandinavian countries (the Swedish Pirate Bay and Finnish Finreactor cases). Finally, it poses some questions as to whether BitTorrent sites should be qualified as hosting services under Article 14 of the EU E-commerce Directive (2000/31/EC) and whether the application of the limited liability standard, as developed by the Court of Justice of the European Union, would be reasonable for BitTorrent file-sharing services in general. SN - 2190-3387 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-38430 ID - matulionytė2013 ER -Download
Wordbib
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" > <b:Source> <b:Tag>matulionytė2013</b:Tag> <b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType> <b:Year>2013</b:Year> <b:PeriodicalTitle>JIPITEC</b:PeriodicalTitle> <b:Volume>4</b:Volume> <b:Issue>3</b:Issue> <b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-38430</b:Url> <b:Pages>179-189</b:Pages> <b:Author> <b:Author><b:NameList> <b:Person><b:Last>Matulionytė</b:Last><b:First>Rita</b:First></b:Person> <b:Person><b:Last>Mindaugas</b:Last><b:First>Lankauskas</b:First></b:Person> </b:NameList></b:Author> </b:Author> <b:Title>Bittorent Loses Again: A Recent Lithuanian BitTorrent Case and What It Means for the Construction of the E-commerce Directive</b:Title> <b:Comments>This article first discusses a recent Lithuanian BitTorrent case, Linkomanija, with its shortcomings and perspectives. It then compares the outcomes of the Lithuanian case with recent court practice in Scandinavian countries (the Swedish Pirate Bay and Finnish Finreactor cases). Finally, it poses some questions as to whether BitTorrent sites should be qualified as hosting services under Article 14 of the EU E-commerce Directive (2000/31/EC) and whether the application of the limited liability standard, as developed by the Court of Justice of the European Union, would be reasonable for BitTorrent file-sharing services in general.</b:Comments> </b:Source> </b:Sources>Download
ISI
PT Journal AU Matulionytė, R Mindaugas, L TI Bittorent Loses Again: A Recent Lithuanian BitTorrent Case and What It Means for the Construction of the E-commerce Directive SO JIPITEC PY 2013 BP 179 EP 189 VL 4 IS 3 DE BitTorrent; E-commerce Directive; File Sharing; Finland; Finreactor; Hosting; Intermediary Liability; Internet Service Provider; Linkomanija; Lithuania; Pirate Bay; Sweden AB This article first discusses a recent Lithuanian BitTorrent case, Linkomanija, with its shortcomings and perspectives. It then compares the outcomes of the Lithuanian case with recent court practice in Scandinavian countries (the Swedish Pirate Bay and Finnish Finreactor cases). Finally, it poses some questions as to whether BitTorrent sites should be qualified as hosting services under Article 14 of the EU E-commerce Directive (2000/31/EC) and whether the application of the limited liability standard, as developed by the Court of Justice of the European Union, would be reasonable for BitTorrent file-sharing services in general. ERDownload
Mods
<mods> <titleInfo> <title>Bittorent Loses Again: A Recent Lithuanian BitTorrent Case and What It Means for the Construction of the E-commerce Directive</title> </titleInfo> <name type="personal"> <namePart type="family">Matulionytė</namePart> <namePart type="given">Rita</namePart> </name> <name type="personal"> <namePart type="family">Mindaugas</namePart> <namePart type="given">Lankauskas</namePart> </name> <abstract>This article first discusses a recent Lithuanian BitTorrent case, Linkomanija, with its shortcomings and perspectives. It then compares the outcomes of the Lithuanian case with recent court practice in Scandinavian countries (the Swedish Pirate Bay and Finnish Finreactor cases). Finally, it poses some questions as to whether BitTorrent sites should be qualified as hosting services under Article 14 of the EU E-commerce Directive (2000/31/EC) and whether the application of the limited liability standard, as developed by the Court of Justice of the European Union, would be reasonable for BitTorrent file-sharing services in general.</abstract> <subject> <topic>BitTorrent</topic> <topic>E-commerce Directive</topic> <topic>File Sharing</topic> <topic>Finland</topic> <topic>Finreactor</topic> <topic>Hosting</topic> <topic>Intermediary Liability</topic> <topic>Internet Service Provider</topic> <topic>Linkomanija</topic> <topic>Lithuania</topic> <topic>Pirate Bay</topic> <topic>Sweden</topic> </subject> <classification authority="ddc">340</classification> <relatedItem type="host"> <genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre> <genre>academic journal</genre> <titleInfo> <title>JIPITEC</title> </titleInfo> <part> <detail type="volume"> <number>4</number> </detail> <detail type="issue"> <number>3</number> </detail> <date>2013</date> <extent unit="page"> <start>179</start> <end>189</end> </extent> </part> </relatedItem> <identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier> <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-38430</identifier> <identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-38430</identifier> <identifier type="citekey">matulionytė2013</identifier> </mods>Download
Full Metadata
Bibliographic Citation | Journal of intellectual property, information technology and electronic commerce law 4 (2013) 3 |
---|---|
Title |
Bittorent Loses Again: A Recent Lithuanian BitTorrent Case and What It Means for the Construction of the E-commerce Directive (eng) |
Author | Rita Matulionytė, Lankauskas Mindaugas |
Language | eng |
Abstract | This article first discusses a recent Lithuanian BitTorrent case, Linkomanija, with its shortcomings and perspectives. It then compares the outcomes of the Lithuanian case with recent court practice in Scandinavian countries (the Swedish Pirate Bay and Finnish Finreactor cases). Finally, it poses some questions as to whether BitTorrent sites should be qualified as hosting services under Article 14 of the EU E-commerce Directive (2000/31/EC) and whether the application of the limited liability standard, as developed by the Court of Justice of the European Union, would be reasonable for BitTorrent file-sharing services in general. |
Subject | BitTorrent, E-commerce Directive, File Sharing, Finland, Finreactor, Hosting, Intermediary Liability, Internet Service Provider, Linkomanija, Lithuania, Pirate Bay, Sweden |
DDC | 340 |
Rights | DPPL |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:0009-29-38430 |