Document Actions
Citation and metadata
Recommended citation
David Krebs, "Privacy by Design": Nice-to-have or a Necessary Principle of Data Protection Law?, 4 (2013) JIPITEC 2 para 1.
Download Citation
Endnote
%0 Journal Article %T "Privacy by Design": Nice-to-have or a Necessary Principle of Data Protection Law? %A Krebs, David %J JIPITEC %D 2013 %V 4 %N 1 %@ 2190-3387 %F krebs2013 %X Privacy by Design is a term that was coined in 1997 by the Canadian privacy expert and Commissioner for Ontario, Dr Ann Cavoukin, but one that has recently been receiving more attention in terms of its inclusion as a positive requirement into EU, US and Canadian data protection frameworks. This paper argues that the right to personal privacy is a fundamental right that deserves utmost protection by society and law. Taking privacy into consideration at the design stage of a system may today be an implicit requirement of Canadian federal and EU legislation, but any such mention is not sufficiently concrete to protect privacy rights with respect to contemporary technology. Effective privacy legislation ought to include an explicit privacy-by- design requirement, including mandating specific technological requirements for those technologies that have the most privacy-intrusive potential. This paper discusses three such applications and how privacy considerations were applied at the design stages. The recent proposal to amend the EU data protection framework includes an explicit privacy-by- design requirement and presents a viable benchmark that Canadian lawmakers would be well-advised to take into consideration. %L 000 %K Canadian Privacy Law %K Comparative Law %K Data protection %K EU Data Protection Regulation %K Right to Privacy %U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-36222 %P 2-20Download
Bibtex
@Article{krebs2013,
author = "Krebs, David",
title = "``Privacy by Design'': Nice-to-have or a Necessary Principle of Data Protection Law?",
journal = "JIPITEC",
year = "2013",
volume = "4",
number = "1",
pages = "2--20",
keywords = "Canadian Privacy Law; Comparative Law; Data protection; EU Data Protection Regulation; Right to Privacy",
abstract = "Privacy by Design is a term that was coined in 1997 by the Canadian privacy expert and Commissioner for Ontario, Dr Ann Cavoukin, but one that has recently been receiving more attention in terms of its inclusion as a positive requirement into EU, US and Canadian data protection frameworks. This paper argues that the right to personal privacy is a fundamental right that deserves utmost protection by society and law. Taking privacy into consideration at the design stage of a system may today be an implicit requirement of Canadian federal and EU legislation, but any such mention is not sufficiently concrete to protect privacy rights with respect to contemporary technology. Effective privacy legislation ought to include an explicit privacy-by- design requirement, including mandating specific technological requirements for those technologies that have the most privacy-intrusive potential. This paper discusses three such applications and how privacy considerations were applied at the design stages. The recent proposal to amend the EU data protection framework includes an explicit privacy-by- design requirement and presents a viable benchmark that Canadian lawmakers would be well-advised to take into consideration.",
issn = "2190-3387",
url = "http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-36222"
}
Download
RIS
TY - JOUR AU - Krebs, David PY - 2013 DA - 2013// TI - "Privacy by Design": Nice-to-have or a Necessary Principle of Data Protection Law? JO - JIPITEC SP - 2 EP - 20 VL - 4 IS - 1 KW - Canadian Privacy Law KW - Comparative Law KW - Data protection KW - EU Data Protection Regulation KW - Right to Privacy AB - Privacy by Design is a term that was coined in 1997 by the Canadian privacy expert and Commissioner for Ontario, Dr Ann Cavoukin, but one that has recently been receiving more attention in terms of its inclusion as a positive requirement into EU, US and Canadian data protection frameworks. This paper argues that the right to personal privacy is a fundamental right that deserves utmost protection by society and law. Taking privacy into consideration at the design stage of a system may today be an implicit requirement of Canadian federal and EU legislation, but any such mention is not sufficiently concrete to protect privacy rights with respect to contemporary technology. Effective privacy legislation ought to include an explicit privacy-by- design requirement, including mandating specific technological requirements for those technologies that have the most privacy-intrusive potential. This paper discusses three such applications and how privacy considerations were applied at the design stages. The recent proposal to amend the EU data protection framework includes an explicit privacy-by- design requirement and presents a viable benchmark that Canadian lawmakers would be well-advised to take into consideration. SN - 2190-3387 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-36222 ID - krebs2013 ER -Download
Wordbib
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" > <b:Source> <b:Tag>krebs2013</b:Tag> <b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType> <b:Year>2013</b:Year> <b:PeriodicalTitle>JIPITEC</b:PeriodicalTitle> <b:Volume>4</b:Volume> <b:Issue>1</b:Issue> <b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-36222</b:Url> <b:Pages>2-20</b:Pages> <b:Author> <b:Author><b:NameList> <b:Person><b:Last>Krebs</b:Last><b:First>David</b:First></b:Person> </b:NameList></b:Author> </b:Author> <b:Title>"Privacy by Design": Nice-to-have or a Necessary Principle of Data Protection Law?</b:Title> <b:Comments>Privacy by Design is a term that was coined in 1997 by the Canadian privacy expert and Commissioner for Ontario, Dr Ann Cavoukin, but one that has recently been receiving more attention in terms of its inclusion as a positive requirement into EU, US and Canadian data protection frameworks. This paper argues that the right to personal privacy is a fundamental right that deserves utmost protection by society and law. Taking privacy into consideration at the design stage of a system may today be an implicit requirement of Canadian federal and EU legislation, but any such mention is not sufficiently concrete to protect privacy rights with respect to contemporary technology. Effective privacy legislation ought to include an explicit privacy-by- design requirement, including mandating specific technological requirements for those technologies that have the most privacy-intrusive potential. This paper discusses three such applications and how privacy considerations were applied at the design stages. The recent proposal to amend the EU data protection framework includes an explicit privacy-by- design requirement and presents a viable benchmark that Canadian lawmakers would be well-advised to take into consideration.</b:Comments> </b:Source> </b:Sources>Download
ISI
PT Journal AU Krebs, D TI "Privacy by Design": Nice-to-have or a Necessary Principle of Data Protection Law? SO JIPITEC PY 2013 BP 2 EP 20 VL 4 IS 1 DE Canadian Privacy Law; Comparative Law; Data protection; EU Data Protection Regulation; Right to Privacy AB Privacy by Design is a term that was coined in 1997 by the Canadian privacy expert and Commissioner for Ontario, Dr Ann Cavoukin, but one that has recently been receiving more attention in terms of its inclusion as a positive requirement into EU, US and Canadian data protection frameworks. This paper argues that the right to personal privacy is a fundamental right that deserves utmost protection by society and law. Taking privacy into consideration at the design stage of a system may today be an implicit requirement of Canadian federal and EU legislation, but any such mention is not sufficiently concrete to protect privacy rights with respect to contemporary technology. Effective privacy legislation ought to include an explicit privacy-by- design requirement, including mandating specific technological requirements for those technologies that have the most privacy-intrusive potential. This paper discusses three such applications and how privacy considerations were applied at the design stages. The recent proposal to amend the EU data protection framework includes an explicit privacy-by- design requirement and presents a viable benchmark that Canadian lawmakers would be well-advised to take into consideration. ERDownload
Mods
<mods>
<titleInfo>
<title>"Privacy by Design": Nice-to-have or a Necessary Principle of Data Protection Law?</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="family">Krebs</namePart>
<namePart type="given">David</namePart>
</name>
<abstract>Privacy by Design is a term that was coined in 1997 by the Canadian privacy expert and Commissioner for Ontario, Dr Ann Cavoukin, but one that has recently been receiving more attention in terms of its inclusion as a positive requirement into EU, US and Canadian data protection frameworks. This paper argues that the right to personal privacy is a fundamental right that deserves utmost protection by society and law. Taking privacy into consideration at the design stage of a system may today be an implicit requirement of Canadian federal and EU legislation, but any such mention is not sufficiently concrete to protect privacy rights with respect to contemporary technology. Effective privacy legislation ought to include an explicit privacy-by- design requirement, including mandating specific technological requirements for those technologies that have the most privacy-intrusive potential. This paper discusses three such applications and how privacy considerations were applied at the design stages. The recent proposal to amend the EU data protection framework includes an explicit privacy-by- design requirement and presents a viable benchmark that Canadian lawmakers would be well-advised to take into consideration.</abstract>
<subject>
<topic>Canadian Privacy Law</topic>
<topic>Comparative Law</topic>
<topic>Data protection</topic>
<topic>EU Data Protection Regulation</topic>
<topic>Right to Privacy</topic>
</subject>
<classification authority="ddc">000</classification>
<classification authority="ddc">340</classification>
<classification authority="ddc" />
<relatedItem type="host">
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<genre>academic journal</genre>
<titleInfo>
<title>JIPITEC</title>
</titleInfo>
<part>
<detail type="volume">
<number>4</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<number>1</number>
</detail>
<date>2013</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>2</start>
<end>20</end>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier>
<identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-36222</identifier>
<identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-36222</identifier>
<identifier type="citekey">krebs2013</identifier>
</mods>
Download
Full Metadata
| Bibliographic Citation | Journal of intellectual property, information technology and electronic commerce law 4 (2013) 1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Title |
"Privacy by Design": Nice-to-have or a Necessary Principle of Data Protection Law? (eng) |
||
| Author | David Krebs | ||
| Language | eng | ||
| Abstract | Privacy by Design is a term that was coined in 1997 by the Canadian privacy expert and Commissioner for Ontario, Dr Ann Cavoukin, but one that has recently been receiving more attention in terms of its inclusion as a positive requirement into EU, US and Canadian data protection frameworks. This paper argues that the right to personal privacy is a fundamental right that deserves utmost protection by society and law. Taking privacy into consideration at the design stage of a system may today be an implicit requirement of Canadian federal and EU legislation, but any such mention is not sufficiently concrete to protect privacy rights with respect to contemporary technology. Effective privacy legislation ought to include an explicit privacy-by- design requirement, including mandating specific technological requirements for those technologies that have the most privacy-intrusive potential. This paper discusses three such applications and how privacy considerations were applied at the design stages. The recent proposal to amend the EU data protection framework includes an explicit privacy-by- design requirement and presents a viable benchmark that Canadian lawmakers would be well-advised to take into consideration. | ||
| Subject | Canadian Privacy Law, Comparative Law, Data protection, EU Data Protection Regulation, Right to Privacy | ||
| DDC | 000 | 340 | |
| Rights | DPPL | ||
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:0009-29-36222 |
