Document Actions
Citation and metadata
Recommended citation
Rita Matulionytė, IP and Applicable Law in Recent International Proposals: Report for the International Law Association, 3 (2012) JIPITEC 263 para 1.
Download Citation
Endnote
%0 Journal Article %T IP and Applicable Law in Recent International Proposals: Report for the International Law Association %A Matulionytė, Rita %J JIPITEC %D 2012 %V 3 %N 3 %@ 2190-3387 %F matulionytė2012 %X The report compares applicable law rules to intellectual property (IP) disputes as proposed in the recent international projects(ALI, CLIP, Transparency, Kopila and Joint Japanese-Korean proposals). Namely, it identifies the differences among proposals, reveals the underlying reasons of differing rules, looks at how particular issues have been until now solved at international and national levels, and finally, overviews the main arguments for and against particular solutions suggested in the proposals. This report was presented in the 1st meeting of the Committee on Intellectual Property and Private International Law of the International Law Association (15-17 March 2012, Lisbon) and is expected to contribute to the merge of current international proposals into a single international initiative. %L 340 %K Applicable Law %K Conflict of Laws %K Initial Ownership %K Intellectual Property %K Lex Loci Protectionis %K Lex Originis %K Party Autonomy %K Ubiquitous Infringement %U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-35205 %P 263-305Download
Bibtex
@Article{matulionytė2012,
author = "Matulionyt{\.{e}}, Rita",
title = "IP and Applicable Law in Recent International Proposals: Report for the International Law Association",
journal = "JIPITEC",
year = "2012",
volume = "3",
number = "3",
pages = "263--305",
keywords = "Applicable Law; Conflict of Laws; Initial Ownership; Intellectual Property; Lex Loci Protectionis; Lex Originis; Party Autonomy; Ubiquitous Infringement",
abstract = "The report compares applicable law rules to intellectual property (IP) disputes as proposed in the recent international projects(ALI, CLIP, Transparency, Kopila and Joint Japanese-Korean proposals). Namely, it identifies the differences among proposals, reveals the underlying reasons of differing rules, looks at how particular issues have been until now solved at international and national levels, and finally, overviews the main arguments for and against particular solutions suggested in the proposals. This report was presented in the 1st meeting of the Committee on Intellectual Property and Private International Law of the International Law Association (15-17 March 2012, Lisbon) and is expected to contribute to the merge of current international proposals into a single international initiative.",
issn = "2190-3387",
url = "http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-35205"
}
Download
RIS
TY - JOUR AU - Matulionytė, Rita PY - 2012 DA - 2012// TI - IP and Applicable Law in Recent International Proposals: Report for the International Law Association JO - JIPITEC SP - 263 EP - 305 VL - 3 IS - 3 KW - Applicable Law KW - Conflict of Laws KW - Initial Ownership KW - Intellectual Property KW - Lex Loci Protectionis KW - Lex Originis KW - Party Autonomy KW - Ubiquitous Infringement AB - The report compares applicable law rules to intellectual property (IP) disputes as proposed in the recent international projects(ALI, CLIP, Transparency, Kopila and Joint Japanese-Korean proposals). Namely, it identifies the differences among proposals, reveals the underlying reasons of differing rules, looks at how particular issues have been until now solved at international and national levels, and finally, overviews the main arguments for and against particular solutions suggested in the proposals. This report was presented in the 1st meeting of the Committee on Intellectual Property and Private International Law of the International Law Association (15-17 March 2012, Lisbon) and is expected to contribute to the merge of current international proposals into a single international initiative. SN - 2190-3387 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-35205 ID - matulionytė2012 ER -Download
Wordbib
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" > <b:Source> <b:Tag>matulionytė2012</b:Tag> <b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType> <b:Year>2012</b:Year> <b:PeriodicalTitle>JIPITEC</b:PeriodicalTitle> <b:Volume>3</b:Volume> <b:Issue>3</b:Issue> <b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-35205</b:Url> <b:Pages>263-305</b:Pages> <b:Author> <b:Author><b:NameList> <b:Person><b:Last>Matulionytė</b:Last><b:First>Rita</b:First></b:Person> </b:NameList></b:Author> </b:Author> <b:Title>IP and Applicable Law in Recent International Proposals: Report for the International Law Association</b:Title> <b:Comments>The report compares applicable law rules to intellectual property (IP) disputes as proposed in the recent international projects(ALI, CLIP, Transparency, Kopila and Joint Japanese-Korean proposals). Namely, it identifies the differences among proposals, reveals the underlying reasons of differing rules, looks at how particular issues have been until now solved at international and national levels, and finally, overviews the main arguments for and against particular solutions suggested in the proposals. This report was presented in the 1st meeting of the Committee on Intellectual Property and Private International Law of the International Law Association (15-17 March 2012, Lisbon) and is expected to contribute to the merge of current international proposals into a single international initiative.</b:Comments> </b:Source> </b:Sources>Download
ISI
PT Journal AU Matulionytė, R TI IP and Applicable Law in Recent International Proposals: Report for the International Law Association SO JIPITEC PY 2012 BP 263 EP 305 VL 3 IS 3 DE Applicable Law; Conflict of Laws; Initial Ownership; Intellectual Property; Lex Loci Protectionis; Lex Originis; Party Autonomy; Ubiquitous Infringement AB The report compares applicable law rules to intellectual property (IP) disputes as proposed in the recent international projects(ALI, CLIP, Transparency, Kopila and Joint Japanese-Korean proposals). Namely, it identifies the differences among proposals, reveals the underlying reasons of differing rules, looks at how particular issues have been until now solved at international and national levels, and finally, overviews the main arguments for and against particular solutions suggested in the proposals. This report was presented in the 1st meeting of the Committee on Intellectual Property and Private International Law of the International Law Association (15-17 March 2012, Lisbon) and is expected to contribute to the merge of current international proposals into a single international initiative. ERDownload
Mods
<mods>
<titleInfo>
<title>IP and Applicable Law in Recent International Proposals: Report for the International Law Association</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="family">Matulionytė</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Rita</namePart>
</name>
<abstract>The report compares applicable law rules to intellectual property (IP) disputes as proposed in the recent international projects(ALI, CLIP, Transparency, Kopila and Joint Japanese-Korean proposals). Namely, it identifies the differences among proposals, reveals the underlying reasons of differing rules, looks at how particular issues have been until now solved at international and national levels, and finally, overviews the main arguments for and against particular solutions suggested in the proposals. This report was presented in the 1st meeting of the Committee on Intellectual Property and Private International Law of the International Law Association (15-17 March 2012, Lisbon) and is expected to contribute to the merge of current international proposals into a single international initiative.</abstract>
<subject>
<topic>Applicable Law</topic>
<topic>Conflict of Laws</topic>
<topic>Initial Ownership</topic>
<topic>Intellectual Property</topic>
<topic>Lex Loci Protectionis</topic>
<topic>Lex Originis</topic>
<topic>Party Autonomy</topic>
<topic>Ubiquitous Infringement</topic>
</subject>
<classification authority="ddc">340</classification>
<relatedItem type="host">
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<genre>academic journal</genre>
<titleInfo>
<title>JIPITEC</title>
</titleInfo>
<part>
<detail type="volume">
<number>3</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<number>3</number>
</detail>
<date>2012</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>263</start>
<end>305</end>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier>
<identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-35205</identifier>
<identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-35205</identifier>
<identifier type="citekey">matulionytė2012</identifier>
</mods>
Download
Full Metadata
| Bibliographic Citation | Journal of intellectual property, information technology and electronic commerce law 3 (2012) 3 |
|---|---|
| Title |
IP and Applicable Law in Recent International Proposals: Report for the International Law Association (eng) |
| Author | Rita Matulionytė |
| Language | eng |
| Abstract | The report compares applicable law rules to intellectual property (IP) disputes as proposed in the recent international projects(ALI, CLIP, Transparency, Kopila and Joint Japanese-Korean proposals). Namely, it identifies the differences among proposals, reveals the underlying reasons of differing rules, looks at how particular issues have been until now solved at international and national levels, and finally, overviews the main arguments for and against particular solutions suggested in the proposals. This report was presented in the 1st meeting of the Committee on Intellectual Property and Private International Law of the International Law Association (15-17 March 2012, Lisbon) and is expected to contribute to the merge of current international proposals into a single international initiative. |
| Subject | Applicable Law, Conflict of Laws, Initial Ownership, Intellectual Property, Lex Loci Protectionis, Lex Originis, Party Autonomy, Ubiquitous Infringement |
| DDC | 340 |
| Rights | DPPL |
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:0009-29-35205 |
