PT Journal
AU Ubertazzi, B
TI Infringement and Exclusive Jurisdiction in Intellectual Property: a  Comparison for the International Law Association
SO JIPITEC
PY 2012
BP 227
EP 262
VL 3
IS 3
DE Exclusive (subject-matter) Jurisdiction; Infringement; Intellectual Property; Inter Partes Effects; Jurisdiction; Territoriality; Ubiquity; Validity
AB The following comparison was written for the first meeting of the International Law Association newly established (2010) Committee on Intellectual Property and Private International Law (Chair: Professor Toshiyuki Kono, Kyushu University; Co-Rapporteurs: Professors Pedro de Miguel Asensio, Madrid Complutense University, and Axel Metzger, Hannover University) (hereinafter: ILA Committee), which was hosted at the Faculty of Law of the University of Lisbon in March 16-17, 2012. The comparison at stake concerns the rules on infringement and exclusive (subject-mater) jurisdiction posed (or rejected, in case of exclusive jurisdiction) by four sets of academic principles. Notwithstanding the fact that the rules in question present several differences, those differences in the majority of cases could be overcome by further studies and work of the ILA Committee, as the following comparison explains.
ER