Document Actions
Citation and metadata
Recommended citation
Martin Husovec, Domain Name Transfer before Slovak and Czech Courts, 3 (2012) JIPITEC 148 para 1.
Download Citation
Endnote
%0 Journal Article %T Domain Name Transfer before Slovak and Czech Courts %A Husovec, Martin %J JIPITEC %D 2012 %V 3 %N 2 %@ 2190-3387 %F husovec2012 %X In Europe, a disagreement persists in the courts about the possibility of plaintiffs to request a domain name transfer in domain name disputes. In the last ten years, Slovak and Czech courts also produced some jurisprudence on this issue. Interestingly, the BGH’s influential opinion in the shell.de decision, which denied domain name transfer as an available remedy under German law back in 2002, wasn’t initially followed. To the contrary, several Slovak and Czech decisions of lower courts allowed a domain name transfer using two different legal bases. This seemingly settled case law was rejected a few months ago by the globtour.cz decision of the Czech Supreme Court, which refused domain name transfers for the time being %L 340 %U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-34423 %P 148-152Download
Bibtex
@Article{husovec2012,
author = "Husovec, Martin",
title = "Domain Name Transfer before Slovak and Czech Courts",
journal = "JIPITEC",
year = "2012",
volume = "3",
number = "2",
pages = "148--152",
abstract = "In Europe, a disagreement persists in the courts about the possibility of plaintiffs to request a domain name transfer in domain name disputes. In the last ten years, Slovak and Czech courts also produced some jurisprudence on this issue. Interestingly, the BGH's influential opinion in the shell.de decision, which denied domain name transfer as an available remedy under German law back in 2002, wasn't initially followed. To the contrary, several Slovak and Czech decisions of lower courts allowed a domain name transfer using two different legal bases. This seemingly settled case law was rejected a few months ago by the globtour.cz decision of the Czech Supreme Court, which refused domain name transfers for the time being",
issn = "2190-3387",
url = "http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-34423"
}
Download
RIS
TY - JOUR AU - Husovec, Martin PY - 2012 DA - 2012// TI - Domain Name Transfer before Slovak and Czech Courts JO - JIPITEC SP - 148 EP - 152 VL - 3 IS - 2 AB - In Europe, a disagreement persists in the courts about the possibility of plaintiffs to request a domain name transfer in domain name disputes. In the last ten years, Slovak and Czech courts also produced some jurisprudence on this issue. Interestingly, the BGH’s influential opinion in the shell.de decision, which denied domain name transfer as an available remedy under German law back in 2002, wasn’t initially followed. To the contrary, several Slovak and Czech decisions of lower courts allowed a domain name transfer using two different legal bases. This seemingly settled case law was rejected a few months ago by the globtour.cz decision of the Czech Supreme Court, which refused domain name transfers for the time being SN - 2190-3387 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-34423 ID - husovec2012 ER -Download
Wordbib
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" > <b:Source> <b:Tag>husovec2012</b:Tag> <b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType> <b:Year>2012</b:Year> <b:PeriodicalTitle>JIPITEC</b:PeriodicalTitle> <b:Volume>3</b:Volume> <b:Issue>2</b:Issue> <b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-34423</b:Url> <b:Pages>148-152</b:Pages> <b:Author> <b:Author><b:NameList> <b:Person><b:Last>Husovec</b:Last><b:First>Martin</b:First></b:Person> </b:NameList></b:Author> </b:Author> <b:Title>Domain Name Transfer before Slovak and Czech Courts</b:Title> <b:Comments>In Europe, a disagreement persists in the courts about the possibility of plaintiffs to request a domain name transfer in domain name disputes. In the last ten years, Slovak and Czech courts also produced some jurisprudence on this issue. Interestingly, the BGH’s influential opinion in the shell.de decision, which denied domain name transfer as an available remedy under German law back in 2002, wasn’t initially followed. To the contrary, several Slovak and Czech decisions of lower courts allowed a domain name transfer using two different legal bases. This seemingly settled case law was rejected a few months ago by the globtour.cz decision of the Czech Supreme Court, which refused domain name transfers for the time being</b:Comments> </b:Source> </b:Sources>Download
ISI
PT Journal AU Husovec, M TI Domain Name Transfer before Slovak and Czech Courts SO JIPITEC PY 2012 BP 148 EP 152 VL 3 IS 2 AB In Europe, a disagreement persists in the courts about the possibility of plaintiffs to request a domain name transfer in domain name disputes. In the last ten years, Slovak and Czech courts also produced some jurisprudence on this issue. Interestingly, the BGH’s influential opinion in the shell.de decision, which denied domain name transfer as an available remedy under German law back in 2002, wasn’t initially followed. To the contrary, several Slovak and Czech decisions of lower courts allowed a domain name transfer using two different legal bases. This seemingly settled case law was rejected a few months ago by the globtour.cz decision of the Czech Supreme Court, which refused domain name transfers for the time being ERDownload
Mods
<mods>
<titleInfo>
<title>Domain Name Transfer before Slovak and Czech Courts</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="family">Husovec</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Martin</namePart>
</name>
<abstract>In Europe, a disagreement persists in the courts about the possibility of plaintiffs to request a domain name transfer in domain name disputes. In the last ten years, Slovak and Czech courts also produced some jurisprudence on this issue. Interestingly, the BGH’s influential opinion in the shell.de decision, which denied domain name transfer as an available remedy under German law back in 2002, wasn’t initially followed. To the contrary, several Slovak and Czech decisions of lower courts allowed a domain name transfer using two different legal bases. This seemingly settled case law was rejected a few months ago by the globtour.cz decision of the Czech Supreme Court, which refused domain name transfers for the time being</abstract>
<subject />
<classification authority="ddc">340</classification>
<relatedItem type="host">
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<genre>academic journal</genre>
<titleInfo>
<title>JIPITEC</title>
</titleInfo>
<part>
<detail type="volume">
<number>3</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<number>2</number>
</detail>
<date>2012</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>148</start>
<end>152</end>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier>
<identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-34423</identifier>
<identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-34423</identifier>
<identifier type="citekey">husovec2012</identifier>
</mods>
Download
Full Metadata
| Bibliographic Citation | Journal of intellectual property, information technology and electronic commerce law 3 (2012) 2 |
|---|---|
| Title |
Domain Name Transfer before Slovak and Czech Courts (eng) |
| Author | Martin Husovec |
| Language | eng |
| Abstract | In Europe, a disagreement persists in the courts about the possibility of plaintiffs to request a domain name transfer in domain name disputes. In the last ten years, Slovak and Czech courts also produced some jurisprudence on this issue. Interestingly, the BGH’s influential opinion in the shell.de decision, which denied domain name transfer as an available remedy under German law back in 2002, wasn’t initially followed. To the contrary, several Slovak and Czech decisions of lower courts allowed a domain name transfer using two different legal bases. This seemingly settled case law was rejected a few months ago by the globtour.cz decision of the Czech Supreme Court, which refused domain name transfers for the time being |
| Subject | |
| DDC | 340 |
| Rights | DPPL |
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:0009-29-34423 |
