Document Actions

Citation and metadata

Recommended citation

Martin Husovec, Domain Name Transfer before Slovak and Czech Courts, 3 (2012) JIPITEC 148 para 1.

Download Citation

Endnote

%0 Journal Article
%T Domain Name Transfer before Slovak and Czech Courts
%A Husovec, Martin
%J JIPITEC
%D 2012
%V 3
%N 2
%@ 2190-3387
%F husovec2012
%X In Europe, a disagreement persists in the courts about the possibility of plaintiffs to request a domain name transfer in domain name disputes. In the last ten years, Slovak and Czech courts also produced some jurisprudence on this issue. Interestingly, the BGH’s influential opinion in the shell.de decision, which denied domain name transfer as an available remedy under German law back in 2002, wasn’t initially followed. To the contrary, several Slovak and Czech decisions of lower courts allowed a domain name transfer using two different legal bases. This seemingly settled case law was rejected a few months ago by the globtour.cz decision of the Czech Supreme Court, which refused domain name transfers for the time being
%L 340
%U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-34423
%P 148-152

Download

Bibtex

@Article{husovec2012,
  author = 	"Husovec, Martin",
  title = 	"Domain Name Transfer before Slovak and Czech Courts",
  journal = 	"JIPITEC",
  year = 	"2012",
  volume = 	"3",
  number = 	"2",
  pages = 	"148--152",
  abstract = 	"In Europe, a disagreement persists in the courts about the possibility of plaintiffs to request a domain name transfer in domain name disputes. In the last ten years, Slovak and Czech courts also produced some jurisprudence on this issue. Interestingly, the BGH's influential opinion in the shell.de decision, which denied domain name transfer as an available remedy under German law back in 2002, wasn't initially followed. To the contrary, several Slovak and Czech decisions of lower courts allowed a domain name transfer using two different legal bases. This seemingly settled case law was rejected a few months ago by the globtour.cz decision of the Czech Supreme Court, which refused domain name transfers for the time being",
  issn = 	"2190-3387",
  url = 	"http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-34423"
}

Download

RIS

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Husovec, Martin
PY  - 2012
DA  - 2012//
TI  - Domain Name Transfer before Slovak and Czech Courts
JO  - JIPITEC
SP  - 148
EP  - 152
VL  - 3
IS  - 2
AB  - In Europe, a disagreement persists in the courts about the possibility of plaintiffs to request a domain name transfer in domain name disputes. In the last ten years, Slovak and Czech courts also produced some jurisprudence on this issue. Interestingly, the BGH’s influential opinion in the shell.de decision, which denied domain name transfer as an available remedy under German law back in 2002, wasn’t initially followed. To the contrary, several Slovak and Czech decisions of lower courts allowed a domain name transfer using two different legal bases. This seemingly settled case law was rejected a few months ago by the globtour.cz decision of the Czech Supreme Court, which refused domain name transfers for the time being
SN  - 2190-3387
UR  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-34423
ID  - husovec2012
ER  - 
Download

Wordbib

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography"  xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" >
<b:Source>
<b:Tag>husovec2012</b:Tag>
<b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType>
<b:Year>2012</b:Year>
<b:PeriodicalTitle>JIPITEC</b:PeriodicalTitle>
<b:Volume>3</b:Volume>
<b:Issue>2</b:Issue>
<b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-34423</b:Url>
<b:Pages>148-152</b:Pages>
<b:Author>
<b:Author><b:NameList>
<b:Person><b:Last>Husovec</b:Last><b:First>Martin</b:First></b:Person>
</b:NameList></b:Author>
</b:Author>
<b:Title>Domain Name Transfer before Slovak and Czech Courts</b:Title>
<b:Comments>In Europe, a disagreement persists in the courts about the possibility of plaintiffs to request a domain name transfer in domain name disputes. In the last ten years, Slovak and Czech courts also produced some jurisprudence on this issue. Interestingly, the BGH’s influential opinion in the shell.de decision, which denied domain name transfer as an available remedy under German law back in 2002, wasn’t initially followed. To the contrary, several Slovak and Czech decisions of lower courts allowed a domain name transfer using two different legal bases. This seemingly settled case law was rejected a few months ago by the globtour.cz decision of the Czech Supreme Court, which refused domain name transfers for the time being</b:Comments>
</b:Source>
</b:Sources>
Download

ISI

PT Journal
AU Husovec, M
TI Domain Name Transfer before Slovak and Czech Courts
SO JIPITEC
PY 2012
BP 148
EP 152
VL 3
IS 2
AB In Europe, a disagreement persists in the courts about the possibility of plaintiffs to request a domain name transfer in domain name disputes. In the last ten years, Slovak and Czech courts also produced some jurisprudence on this issue. Interestingly, the BGH’s influential opinion in the shell.de decision, which denied domain name transfer as an available remedy under German law back in 2002, wasn’t initially followed. To the contrary, several Slovak and Czech decisions of lower courts allowed a domain name transfer using two different legal bases. This seemingly settled case law was rejected a few months ago by the globtour.cz decision of the Czech Supreme Court, which refused domain name transfers for the time being
ER

Download

Mods

<mods>
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Domain Name Transfer before Slovak and Czech Courts</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart type="family">Husovec</namePart>
    <namePart type="given">Martin</namePart>
  </name>
  <abstract>In Europe, a disagreement persists in the courts about the possibility of plaintiffs to request a domain name transfer in domain name disputes. In the last ten years, Slovak and Czech courts also produced some jurisprudence on this issue. Interestingly, the BGH’s influential opinion in the shell.de decision, which denied domain name transfer as an available remedy under German law back in 2002, wasn’t initially followed. To the contrary, several Slovak and Czech decisions of lower courts allowed a domain name transfer using two different legal bases. This seemingly settled case law was rejected a few months ago by the globtour.cz decision of the Czech Supreme Court, which refused domain name transfers for the time being</abstract>
  <subject />
  <classification authority="ddc">340</classification>
  <relatedItem type="host">
    <genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
    <genre>academic journal</genre>
    <titleInfo>
      <title>JIPITEC</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <part>
      <detail type="volume">
        <number>3</number>
      </detail>
      <detail type="issue">
        <number>2</number>
      </detail>
      <date>2012</date>
      <extent unit="page">
        <start>148</start>
        <end>152</end>
      </extent>
    </part>
  </relatedItem>
  <identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier>
  <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-34423</identifier>
  <identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-34423</identifier>
  <identifier type="citekey">husovec2012</identifier>
</mods>
Download

Full Metadata

JIPITEC – Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law
Article search
Extended article search
Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter
Follow Us
twitter
 
Navigation