Document Actions
Citation and metadata
Recommended citation
Max van Drunen, Brahim Zarouali, Natali Helberger, Recommenders you can rely on: A legal and empirical perspective on the transparency and control individuals require to trust news personalisation, 13 (2022) JIPITEC 302 para 1.
Download Citation
Endnote
%0 Journal Article %T Recommenders you can rely on: A legal and empirical perspective on the transparency and control individuals require to trust news personalisation %A van Drunen, Max %A Zarouali, Brahim %A Helberger, Natali %J JIPITEC %D 2022 %V 13 %N 3 %@ 2190-3387 %F van drunen2022 %X This article explores the role law can play to support trust in the context of news personalisation. The need to ensure trust in the face of technological changes in information dissemination is an important aspect of both recent horizontal legislation such as the Digital Services Act, as well as context-specific specific efforts surrounding for example disinformation. In these legal discussions, however, what trust is, why law should promote it, and what concrete measures are suitable to do so often remain ambiguous. This raises suspicions over whether trust is simply a selling point of traditional legal measures, and if not, what concrete role law can and should play to promote trust. This article focuses on the role control and transparency measures can play to safeguard trust in organisations that use news personalisation. It first analyses how trust should be understood in the context of news personalisation, how media regulation has traditionally supported trust, and how it should continue to do so in the context of news personalisation. It then draws on a conceptual framework of transparency measures in the context of news personalisation to survey how important different transparency and control measures are to the individuals who place trust in organisations that use personalisation. Law’s current focus on informing individuals about and empowering them to stop personalisation does not account for the importance of enabling individuals to control how news is personalised. %L 340 %K DSA %K control %K personalisation %K transparency %K trust %U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-55623 %P 302-322Download
Bibtex
@Article{vandrunen2022,
author = "van Drunen, Max
and Zarouali, Brahim
and Helberger, Natali",
title = "Recommenders you can rely on: A legal and empirical perspective on the transparency and control individuals require to trust news personalisation",
journal = "JIPITEC",
year = "2022",
volume = "13",
number = "3",
pages = "302--322",
keywords = "DSA; control; personalisation; transparency; trust",
abstract = "This article explores the role law can play to support trust in the context of news personalisation. The need to ensure trust in the face of technological changes in information dissemination is an important aspect of both recent horizontal legislation such as the Digital Services Act, as well as context-specific specific efforts surrounding for example disinformation. In these legal discussions, however, what trust is, why law should promote it, and what concrete measures are suitable to do so often remain ambiguous. This raises suspicions over whether trust is simply a selling point of traditional legal measures, and if not, what concrete role law can and should play to promote trust. This article focuses on the role control and transparency measures can play to safeguard trust in organisations that use news personalisation. It first analyses how trust should be understood in the context of news personalisation, how media regulation has traditionally supported trust, and how it should continue to do so in the context of news personalisation. It then draws on a conceptual framework of transparency measures in the context of news personalisation to survey how important different transparency and control measures are to the individuals who place trust in organisations that use personalisation. Law's current focus on informing individuals about and empowering them to stop personalisation does not account for the importance of enabling individuals to control how news is personalised.",
issn = "2190-3387",
url = "http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-55623"
}
Download
RIS
TY - JOUR AU - van Drunen, Max AU - Zarouali, Brahim AU - Helberger, Natali PY - 2022 DA - 2022// TI - Recommenders you can rely on: A legal and empirical perspective on the transparency and control individuals require to trust news personalisation JO - JIPITEC SP - 302 EP - 322 VL - 13 IS - 3 KW - DSA KW - control KW - personalisation KW - transparency KW - trust AB - This article explores the role law can play to support trust in the context of news personalisation. The need to ensure trust in the face of technological changes in information dissemination is an important aspect of both recent horizontal legislation such as the Digital Services Act, as well as context-specific specific efforts surrounding for example disinformation. In these legal discussions, however, what trust is, why law should promote it, and what concrete measures are suitable to do so often remain ambiguous. This raises suspicions over whether trust is simply a selling point of traditional legal measures, and if not, what concrete role law can and should play to promote trust. This article focuses on the role control and transparency measures can play to safeguard trust in organisations that use news personalisation. It first analyses how trust should be understood in the context of news personalisation, how media regulation has traditionally supported trust, and how it should continue to do so in the context of news personalisation. It then draws on a conceptual framework of transparency measures in the context of news personalisation to survey how important different transparency and control measures are to the individuals who place trust in organisations that use personalisation. Law’s current focus on informing individuals about and empowering them to stop personalisation does not account for the importance of enabling individuals to control how news is personalised. SN - 2190-3387 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-55623 ID - van drunen2022 ER -Download
Wordbib
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" > <b:Source> <b:Tag>van drunen2022</b:Tag> <b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType> <b:Year>2022</b:Year> <b:PeriodicalTitle>JIPITEC</b:PeriodicalTitle> <b:Volume>13</b:Volume> <b:Issue>3</b:Issue> <b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-55623</b:Url> <b:Pages>302-322</b:Pages> <b:Author> <b:Author><b:NameList> <b:Person><b:Last>van Drunen</b:Last><b:First>Max</b:First></b:Person> <b:Person><b:Last>Zarouali</b:Last><b:First>Brahim</b:First></b:Person> <b:Person><b:Last>Helberger</b:Last><b:First>Natali</b:First></b:Person> </b:NameList></b:Author> </b:Author> <b:Title>Recommenders you can rely on: A legal and empirical perspective on the transparency and control individuals require to trust news personalisation</b:Title> <b:Comments>This article explores the role law can play to support trust in the context of news personalisation. The need to ensure trust in the face of technological changes in information dissemination is an important aspect of both recent horizontal legislation such as the Digital Services Act, as well as context-specific specific efforts surrounding for example disinformation. In these legal discussions, however, what trust is, why law should promote it, and what concrete measures are suitable to do so often remain ambiguous. This raises suspicions over whether trust is simply a selling point of traditional legal measures, and if not, what concrete role law can and should play to promote trust. This article focuses on the role control and transparency measures can play to safeguard trust in organisations that use news personalisation. It first analyses how trust should be understood in the context of news personalisation, how media regulation has traditionally supported trust, and how it should continue to do so in the context of news personalisation. It then draws on a conceptual framework of transparency measures in the context of news personalisation to survey how important different transparency and control measures are to the individuals who place trust in organisations that use personalisation. Law’s current focus on informing individuals about and empowering them to stop personalisation does not account for the importance of enabling individuals to control how news is personalised.</b:Comments> </b:Source> </b:Sources>Download
ISI
PT Journal AU van Drunen, M Zarouali, B Helberger, N TI Recommenders you can rely on: A legal and empirical perspective on the transparency and control individuals require to trust news personalisation SO JIPITEC PY 2022 BP 302 EP 322 VL 13 IS 3 DE DSA; control; personalisation; transparency; trust AB This article explores the role law can play to support trust in the context of news personalisation. The need to ensure trust in the face of technological changes in information dissemination is an important aspect of both recent horizontal legislation such as the Digital Services Act, as well as context-specific specific efforts surrounding for example disinformation. In these legal discussions, however, what trust is, why law should promote it, and what concrete measures are suitable to do so often remain ambiguous. This raises suspicions over whether trust is simply a selling point of traditional legal measures, and if not, what concrete role law can and should play to promote trust. This article focuses on the role control and transparency measures can play to safeguard trust in organisations that use news personalisation. It first analyses how trust should be understood in the context of news personalisation, how media regulation has traditionally supported trust, and how it should continue to do so in the context of news personalisation. It then draws on a conceptual framework of transparency measures in the context of news personalisation to survey how important different transparency and control measures are to the individuals who place trust in organisations that use personalisation. Law’s current focus on informing individuals about and empowering them to stop personalisation does not account for the importance of enabling individuals to control how news is personalised. ERDownload
Mods
<mods>
<titleInfo>
<title>Recommenders you can rely on: A legal and empirical perspective on the transparency and control individuals require to trust news personalisation</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="family">van Drunen</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Max</namePart>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="family">Zarouali</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Brahim</namePart>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="family">Helberger</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Natali</namePart>
</name>
<abstract>This article explores the role law can play to support trust in the context of news personalisation. The need to ensure trust in the face of technological changes in information dissemination is an important aspect of both recent horizontal legislation such as the Digital Services Act, as well as context-specific specific efforts surrounding for example disinformation. In these legal discussions, however, what trust is, why law should promote it, and what concrete measures are suitable to do so often remain ambiguous. This raises suspicions over whether trust is simply a selling point of traditional legal measures, and if not, what concrete role law can and should play to promote trust. This article focuses on the role control and transparency measures can play to safeguard trust in organisations that use news personalisation. It first analyses how trust should be understood in the context of news personalisation, how media regulation has traditionally supported trust, and how it should continue to do so in the context of news personalisation. It then draws on a conceptual framework of transparency measures in the context of news personalisation to survey how important different transparency and control measures are to the individuals who place trust in organisations that use personalisation. Law’s current focus on informing individuals about and empowering them to stop personalisation does not account for the importance of enabling individuals to control how news is personalised.</abstract>
<subject>
<topic>DSA</topic>
<topic>control</topic>
<topic>personalisation</topic>
<topic>transparency</topic>
<topic>trust</topic>
</subject>
<classification authority="ddc">340</classification>
<relatedItem type="host">
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<genre>academic journal</genre>
<titleInfo>
<title>JIPITEC</title>
</titleInfo>
<part>
<detail type="volume">
<number>13</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<number>3</number>
</detail>
<date>2022</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>302</start>
<end>322</end>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier>
<identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-55623</identifier>
<identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-55623</identifier>
<identifier type="citekey">van drunen2022</identifier>
</mods>
Download
Full Metadata
| Bibliographic Citation | Journal of intellectual property, information technology and electronic commerce law 13 (2022) 3 |
|---|---|
| Title |
Recommenders you can rely on: A legal and empirical perspective on the transparency and control individuals require to trust news personalisation (eng) |
| Author | Max van Drunen, Brahim Zarouali, Natali Helberger |
| Language | eng |
| Abstract | This article explores the role law can play to support trust in the context of news personalisation. The need to ensure trust in the face of technological changes in information dissemination is an important aspect of both recent horizontal legislation such as the Digital Services Act, as well as context-specific specific efforts surrounding for example disinformation. In these legal discussions, however, what trust is, why law should promote it, and what concrete measures are suitable to do so often remain ambiguous. This raises suspicions over whether trust is simply a selling point of traditional legal measures, and if not, what concrete role law can and should play to promote trust. This article focuses on the role control and transparency measures can play to safeguard trust in organisations that use news personalisation. It first analyses how trust should be understood in the context of news personalisation, how media regulation has traditionally supported trust, and how it should continue to do so in the context of news personalisation. It then draws on a conceptual framework of transparency measures in the context of news personalisation to survey how important different transparency and control measures are to the individuals who place trust in organisations that use personalisation. Law’s current focus on informing individuals about and empowering them to stop personalisation does not account for the importance of enabling individuals to control how news is personalised. |
| Subject | DSA, control, personalisation, transparency, trust |
| DDC | 340 |
| Rights | DPPL |
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:0009-29-55623 |
