Document Actions
Citation and metadata
Recommended citation
Mihail Miller, Stephan Klingner, Transparency Reports of European CMOs: Between legislative aspirations and operational reality – comparability impending factors and solution strategies, 13 (2022) JIPITEC 160 para 1.
Download Citation
Endnote
%0 Journal Article %T Transparency Reports of European CMOs: Between legislative aspirations and operational reality – comparability impending factors and solution strategies %A Miller, Mihail %A Klingner, Stephan %J JIPITEC %D 2022 %V 13 %N 2 %@ 2190-3387 %F miller2022 %X Directive 2014/26/EU set out the right of rightholders to authorise collective manage¬ment organisations (CMOs) within the European Eco-nomic Area that are best suited to their needs. To this end, the Directive established a harmonised gov¬ernance framework for CMOs to ensure, among other things, transparency towards their stakeholders. Transparency is a key factor for inducing competition and efficiency in the collective rights management (CRM) market. For this reason publishing various business details became mandatory for CMOs in the EU. Especially information on “categories of rights” and “type[s] of use” are of great relevance for right¬holders and licensees, as these are subject-matters of their interaction with CMOs. However, evaluating the disclosure of information on these subjects in the transparency reports of 21 music copyright CMOs of the EU, we find the terminology and the structure of information to be very heterogeneous. This makes comparative assessments very labour-intensive, po¬tentially biased, inaccurate and highly inefficient. To this end, we present the use of controlled vocabular¬ies as a strategy to harmonise the way this informa-tion is reported. %L 340 %K Directive 2014/26/EU %K collecting societies %K collective management organisations %K copyrights %K transparency reports %U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-55428 %P 160-174Download
Bibtex
@Article{miller2022,
author = "Miller, Mihail
and Klingner, Stephan",
title = "Transparency Reports of European CMOs: Between legislative aspirations and operational reality -- comparability impending factors and solution strategies",
journal = "JIPITEC",
year = "2022",
volume = "13",
number = "2",
pages = "160--174",
keywords = "Directive 2014/26/EU; collecting societies; collective management organisations; copyrights; transparency reports",
abstract = "Directive 2014/26/EU set out the right of rightholders to authorise collective manage{\textlnot}ment organisations (CMOs) within the European Eco-nomic Area that are best suited to their needs. To this end, the Directive established a harmonised gov{\textlnot}ernance framework for CMOs to ensure, among other things, transparency towards their stakeholders. Transparency is a key factor for inducing competition and efficiency in the collective rights management (CRM) market. For this reason publishing various business details became mandatory for CMOs in the EU. Especially information on ``categories of rights'' and ``type[s] of use'' are of great relevance for right{\textlnot}holders and licensees, as these are subject-matters of their interaction with CMOs. However, evaluating the disclosure of information on these subjects in the transparency reports of 21 music copyright CMOs of the EU, we find the terminology and the structure of information to be very heterogeneous. This makes comparative assessments very labour-intensive, po{\textlnot}tentially biased, inaccurate and highly inefficient. To this end, we present the use of controlled vocabular{\textlnot}ies as a strategy to harmonise the way this informa-tion is reported.",
issn = "2190-3387",
url = "http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-55428"
}
Download
RIS
TY - JOUR AU - Miller, Mihail AU - Klingner, Stephan PY - 2022 DA - 2022// TI - Transparency Reports of European CMOs: Between legislative aspirations and operational reality – comparability impending factors and solution strategies JO - JIPITEC SP - 160 EP - 174 VL - 13 IS - 2 KW - Directive 2014/26/EU KW - collecting societies KW - collective management organisations KW - copyrights KW - transparency reports AB - Directive 2014/26/EU set out the right of rightholders to authorise collective manage¬ment organisations (CMOs) within the European Eco-nomic Area that are best suited to their needs. To this end, the Directive established a harmonised gov¬ernance framework for CMOs to ensure, among other things, transparency towards their stakeholders. Transparency is a key factor for inducing competition and efficiency in the collective rights management (CRM) market. For this reason publishing various business details became mandatory for CMOs in the EU. Especially information on “categories of rights” and “type[s] of use” are of great relevance for right¬holders and licensees, as these are subject-matters of their interaction with CMOs. However, evaluating the disclosure of information on these subjects in the transparency reports of 21 music copyright CMOs of the EU, we find the terminology and the structure of information to be very heterogeneous. This makes comparative assessments very labour-intensive, po¬tentially biased, inaccurate and highly inefficient. To this end, we present the use of controlled vocabular¬ies as a strategy to harmonise the way this informa-tion is reported. SN - 2190-3387 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-55428 ID - miller2022 ER -Download
Wordbib
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" > <b:Source> <b:Tag>miller2022</b:Tag> <b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType> <b:Year>2022</b:Year> <b:PeriodicalTitle>JIPITEC</b:PeriodicalTitle> <b:Volume>13</b:Volume> <b:Issue>2</b:Issue> <b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-55428</b:Url> <b:Pages>160-174</b:Pages> <b:Author> <b:Author><b:NameList> <b:Person><b:Last>Miller</b:Last><b:First>Mihail</b:First></b:Person> <b:Person><b:Last>Klingner</b:Last><b:First>Stephan</b:First></b:Person> </b:NameList></b:Author> </b:Author> <b:Title>Transparency Reports of European CMOs: Between legislative aspirations and operational reality – comparability impending factors and solution strategies</b:Title> <b:Comments>Directive 2014/26/EU set out the right of rightholders to authorise collective manage¬ment organisations (CMOs) within the European Eco-nomic Area that are best suited to their needs. To this end, the Directive established a harmonised gov¬ernance framework for CMOs to ensure, among other things, transparency towards their stakeholders. Transparency is a key factor for inducing competition and efficiency in the collective rights management (CRM) market. For this reason publishing various business details became mandatory for CMOs in the EU. Especially information on “categories of rights” and “type[s] of use” are of great relevance for right¬holders and licensees, as these are subject-matters of their interaction with CMOs. However, evaluating the disclosure of information on these subjects in the transparency reports of 21 music copyright CMOs of the EU, we find the terminology and the structure of information to be very heterogeneous. This makes comparative assessments very labour-intensive, po¬tentially biased, inaccurate and highly inefficient. To this end, we present the use of controlled vocabular¬ies as a strategy to harmonise the way this informa-tion is reported.</b:Comments> </b:Source> </b:Sources>Download
ISI
PT Journal AU Miller, M Klingner, S TI Transparency Reports of European CMOs: Between legislative aspirations and operational reality – comparability impending factors and solution strategies SO JIPITEC PY 2022 BP 160 EP 174 VL 13 IS 2 DE Directive 2014/26/EU; collecting societies; collective management organisations; copyrights; transparency reports AB Directive 2014/26/EU set out the right of rightholders to authorise collective manage¬ment organisations (CMOs) within the European Eco-nomic Area that are best suited to their needs. To this end, the Directive established a harmonised gov¬ernance framework for CMOs to ensure, among other things, transparency towards their stakeholders. Transparency is a key factor for inducing competition and efficiency in the collective rights management (CRM) market. For this reason publishing various business details became mandatory for CMOs in the EU. Especially information on “categories of rights” and “type[s] of use” are of great relevance for right¬holders and licensees, as these are subject-matters of their interaction with CMOs. However, evaluating the disclosure of information on these subjects in the transparency reports of 21 music copyright CMOs of the EU, we find the terminology and the structure of information to be very heterogeneous. This makes comparative assessments very labour-intensive, po¬tentially biased, inaccurate and highly inefficient. To this end, we present the use of controlled vocabular¬ies as a strategy to harmonise the way this informa-tion is reported. ERDownload
Mods
<mods>
<titleInfo>
<title>Transparency Reports of European CMOs: Between legislative aspirations and operational reality – comparability impending factors and solution strategies</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="family">Miller</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Mihail</namePart>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="family">Klingner</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Stephan</namePart>
</name>
<abstract>Directive 2014/26/EU set out the right of rightholders to authorise collective manage¬ment organisations (CMOs) within the European Eco-nomic Area that are best suited to their needs. To this end, the Directive established a harmonised gov¬ernance framework for CMOs to ensure, among other things, transparency towards their stakeholders. Transparency is a key factor for inducing competition and efficiency in the collective rights management (CRM) market. For this reason publishing various business details became mandatory for CMOs in the EU. Especially information on “categories of rights” and “type[s] of use” are of great relevance for right¬holders and licensees, as these are subject-matters of their interaction with CMOs. However, evaluating the disclosure of information on these subjects in the transparency reports of 21 music copyright CMOs of the EU, we find the terminology and the structure of information to be very heterogeneous. This makes comparative assessments very labour-intensive, po¬tentially biased, inaccurate and highly inefficient. To this end, we present the use of controlled vocabular¬ies as a strategy to harmonise the way this informa-tion is reported.</abstract>
<subject>
<topic>Directive 2014/26/EU</topic>
<topic>collecting societies</topic>
<topic>collective management organisations</topic>
<topic>copyrights</topic>
<topic>transparency reports</topic>
</subject>
<classification authority="ddc">340</classification>
<relatedItem type="host">
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<genre>academic journal</genre>
<titleInfo>
<title>JIPITEC</title>
</titleInfo>
<part>
<detail type="volume">
<number>13</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<number>2</number>
</detail>
<date>2022</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>160</start>
<end>174</end>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier>
<identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-55428</identifier>
<identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-55428</identifier>
<identifier type="citekey">miller2022</identifier>
</mods>
Download
Full Metadata
| Bibliographic Citation | Journal of intellectual property, information technology and electronic commerce law 13 (2022) 2 |
|---|---|
| Title |
Transparency Reports of European CMOs: Between legislative aspirations and operational reality – comparability impending factors and solution strategies (eng) |
| Author | Mihail Miller, Stephan Klingner |
| Language | eng |
| Abstract | Directive 2014/26/EU set out the right of rightholders to authorise collective manage¬ment organisations (CMOs) within the European Eco-nomic Area that are best suited to their needs. To this end, the Directive established a harmonised gov¬ernance framework for CMOs to ensure, among other things, transparency towards their stakeholders. Transparency is a key factor for inducing competition and efficiency in the collective rights management (CRM) market. For this reason publishing various business details became mandatory for CMOs in the EU. Especially information on “categories of rights” and “type[s] of use” are of great relevance for right¬holders and licensees, as these are subject-matters of their interaction with CMOs. However, evaluating the disclosure of information on these subjects in the transparency reports of 21 music copyright CMOs of the EU, we find the terminology and the structure of information to be very heterogeneous. This makes comparative assessments very labour-intensive, po¬tentially biased, inaccurate and highly inefficient. To this end, we present the use of controlled vocabular¬ies as a strategy to harmonise the way this informa-tion is reported. |
| Subject | Directive 2014/26/EU, collecting societies, collective management organisations, copyrights, transparency reports |
| DDC | 340 |
| Rights | DPPL |
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:0009-29-55428 |
