Document Actions
Citation and metadata
Recommended citation
Maurice Schellekens, Artificial Intelligence and the re-imagination of inventive step, 13 (2022) JIPITEC 89 para 1.
Download Citation
Endnote
%0 Journal Article %T Artificial Intelligence and the re-imagination of inventive step %A Schellekens, Maurice %J JIPITEC %D 2022 %V 13 %N 2 %@ 2190-3387 %F schellekens2022 %X Artificial intelligence alleviates the work of the inventor. It may even in a distant future take the place of the human inventor. Legal literature has amply reflected about the implications of AI for the requirement of inventive step. In the literature, much attention has been paid to the algorithms of AI since the role they play seems to be the most simi¬lar to that of the human inventor. Although it cannot be completely ruled out that the human inventor will eventually be displaced, it seems to be something for a distant future. This article analyses the implications for the inventive step requirement and concludes that the introduction of a machine-skilled in-the-art as a criterion figure creates many new problems and that in the foreseeable future, existing criteria may function better than is sometimes suggested. %L 340 %K artificial intelligence %K inventive step %K machine-skilled-in-theart %K patent law %K person-skilled-in-the-art %U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-55379 %P 89-98Download
Bibtex
@Article{schellekens2022,
author = "Schellekens, Maurice",
title = "Artificial Intelligence and the re-imagination of inventive step",
journal = "JIPITEC",
year = "2022",
volume = "13",
number = "2",
pages = "89--98",
keywords = "artificial intelligence; inventive step; machine-skilled-in-theart; patent law; person-skilled-in-the-art",
abstract = "Artificial intelligence alleviates the work of the inventor. It may even in a distant future take the place of the human inventor. Legal literature has amply reflected about the implications of AI for the requirement of inventive step. In the literature, much attention has been paid to the algorithms of AI since the role they play seems to be the most simi{\textlnot}lar to that of the human inventor. Although it cannot be completely ruled out that the human inventor will eventually be displaced, it seems to be something for a distant future. This article analyses the implications for the inventive step requirement and concludes that the introduction of a machine-skilled in-the-art as a criterion figure creates many new problems and that in the foreseeable future, existing criteria may function better than is sometimes suggested.",
issn = "2190-3387",
url = "http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-55379"
}
Download
RIS
TY - JOUR AU - Schellekens, Maurice PY - 2022 DA - 2022// TI - Artificial Intelligence and the re-imagination of inventive step JO - JIPITEC SP - 89 EP - 98 VL - 13 IS - 2 KW - artificial intelligence KW - inventive step KW - machine-skilled-in-theart KW - patent law KW - person-skilled-in-the-art AB - Artificial intelligence alleviates the work of the inventor. It may even in a distant future take the place of the human inventor. Legal literature has amply reflected about the implications of AI for the requirement of inventive step. In the literature, much attention has been paid to the algorithms of AI since the role they play seems to be the most simi¬lar to that of the human inventor. Although it cannot be completely ruled out that the human inventor will eventually be displaced, it seems to be something for a distant future. This article analyses the implications for the inventive step requirement and concludes that the introduction of a machine-skilled in-the-art as a criterion figure creates many new problems and that in the foreseeable future, existing criteria may function better than is sometimes suggested. SN - 2190-3387 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-55379 ID - schellekens2022 ER -Download
Wordbib
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" > <b:Source> <b:Tag>schellekens2022</b:Tag> <b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType> <b:Year>2022</b:Year> <b:PeriodicalTitle>JIPITEC</b:PeriodicalTitle> <b:Volume>13</b:Volume> <b:Issue>2</b:Issue> <b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-55379</b:Url> <b:Pages>89-98</b:Pages> <b:Author> <b:Author><b:NameList> <b:Person><b:Last>Schellekens</b:Last><b:First>Maurice</b:First></b:Person> </b:NameList></b:Author> </b:Author> <b:Title>Artificial Intelligence and the re-imagination of inventive step</b:Title> <b:Comments>Artificial intelligence alleviates the work of the inventor. It may even in a distant future take the place of the human inventor. Legal literature has amply reflected about the implications of AI for the requirement of inventive step. In the literature, much attention has been paid to the algorithms of AI since the role they play seems to be the most simi¬lar to that of the human inventor. Although it cannot be completely ruled out that the human inventor will eventually be displaced, it seems to be something for a distant future. This article analyses the implications for the inventive step requirement and concludes that the introduction of a machine-skilled in-the-art as a criterion figure creates many new problems and that in the foreseeable future, existing criteria may function better than is sometimes suggested.</b:Comments> </b:Source> </b:Sources>Download
ISI
PT Journal AU Schellekens, M TI Artificial Intelligence and the re-imagination of inventive step SO JIPITEC PY 2022 BP 89 EP 98 VL 13 IS 2 DE artificial intelligence; inventive step; machine-skilled-in-theart; patent law; person-skilled-in-the-art AB Artificial intelligence alleviates the work of the inventor. It may even in a distant future take the place of the human inventor. Legal literature has amply reflected about the implications of AI for the requirement of inventive step. In the literature, much attention has been paid to the algorithms of AI since the role they play seems to be the most simi¬lar to that of the human inventor. Although it cannot be completely ruled out that the human inventor will eventually be displaced, it seems to be something for a distant future. This article analyses the implications for the inventive step requirement and concludes that the introduction of a machine-skilled in-the-art as a criterion figure creates many new problems and that in the foreseeable future, existing criteria may function better than is sometimes suggested. ERDownload
Mods
<mods>
<titleInfo>
<title>Artificial Intelligence and the re-imagination of inventive step</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="family">Schellekens</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Maurice</namePart>
</name>
<abstract>Artificial intelligence alleviates the work of the inventor. It may even in a distant future take the place of the human inventor. Legal literature has amply reflected about the implications of AI for the requirement of inventive step. In the literature, much attention has been paid to the algorithms of AI since the role they play seems to be the most simi¬lar to that of the human inventor. Although it cannot be completely ruled out that the human inventor will eventually be displaced, it seems to be something for a distant future. This article analyses the implications for the inventive step requirement and concludes that the introduction of a machine-skilled in-the-art as a criterion figure creates many new problems and that in the foreseeable future, existing criteria may function better than is sometimes suggested.</abstract>
<subject>
<topic>artificial intelligence</topic>
<topic>inventive step</topic>
<topic>machine-skilled-in-theart</topic>
<topic>patent law</topic>
<topic>person-skilled-in-the-art</topic>
</subject>
<classification authority="ddc">340</classification>
<relatedItem type="host">
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<genre>academic journal</genre>
<titleInfo>
<title>JIPITEC</title>
</titleInfo>
<part>
<detail type="volume">
<number>13</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<number>2</number>
</detail>
<date>2022</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>89</start>
<end>98</end>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier>
<identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-55379</identifier>
<identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-55379</identifier>
<identifier type="citekey">schellekens2022</identifier>
</mods>
Download
Full Metadata
| Bibliographic Citation | Journal of intellectual property, information technology and electronic commerce law 13 (2022) 2 |
|---|---|
| Title |
Artificial Intelligence and the re-imagination of inventive step (eng) |
| Author | Maurice Schellekens |
| Language | eng |
| Abstract | Artificial intelligence alleviates the work of the inventor. It may even in a distant future take the place of the human inventor. Legal literature has amply reflected about the implications of AI for the requirement of inventive step. In the literature, much attention has been paid to the algorithms of AI since the role they play seems to be the most simi¬lar to that of the human inventor. Although it cannot be completely ruled out that the human inventor will eventually be displaced, it seems to be something for a distant future. This article analyses the implications for the inventive step requirement and concludes that the introduction of a machine-skilled in-the-art as a criterion figure creates many new problems and that in the foreseeable future, existing criteria may function better than is sometimes suggested. |
| Subject | artificial intelligence, inventive step, machine-skilled-in-theart, patent law, person-skilled-in-the-art |
| DDC | 340 |
| Rights | DPPL |
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:0009-29-55379 |
