Document Actions

Citation and metadata

Recommended citation

Folkert Wilman, The EU’s system of knowledge-based liability for hosting service providers in respect of illegal user content – between the e-Commerce Directive and the Digital Services Act, 12 (2021) JIPITEC 317 para 1.

Download Citation

Endnote

%0 Journal Article
%T The EU’s system of knowledge-based liability for hosting service providers in respect of illegal user content – between the e-Commerce Directive and the Digital Services Act
%A Wilman, Folkert
%J JIPITEC
%D 2021
%V 12
%N 3
%@ 2190-3387
%F wilman2021
%X Over the past two decades the principle of knowledge-based liability has been the backbone of the EU’s regime regulating the liability of social media companies, online marketplaces, cloud storage providers and many other online service providers that store and disseminate user-generated content. This article traces the origins, identifies the rationale, assesses the continued relevance and discusses the main strengths and shortcomings of this approach. It is argued that, counter-intuitive as it may seem to some, there are good grounds for retaining the key features of the current liability system, which conditionally shields such service providers from liability for their users’ content. Most important is the system’s ability to strike a fair balance between the conflicting rights and interests of the parties involved – not only the service providers and the users, but also the parties aggrieved by the content. That is not to say, however, that the system has no shortcomings. In particular, the system’s effectiveness in terms of tackling illegal user content causing serious ‘public’ harm could be improved, whilst the system also involves significant risks of unjustified removal of user content. These shortcomings do not mean that the current knowledge-based liability system should be discarded. Instead, it should be improved. Not by excluding certain service providers from the scope of the liability exemption or adding conditions, but rather by enacting complementary requirements. Against this background the article assesses to what extent the recently proposed Digital Services Act addresses the identified shortcomings.
%L 340
%K Digital Services Act (DSA)
%K e-Commerce Directive
%K hosting service providers
%K intermediary liability
%K notice and action
%U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-53432
%P 317-341

Download

Bibtex

@Article{wilman2021,
  author = 	"Wilman, Folkert",
  title = 	"The EU's system of knowledge-based liability for hosting service providers in respect of illegal user content -- between the e-Commerce Directive and the Digital Services Act",
  journal = 	"JIPITEC",
  year = 	"2021",
  volume = 	"12",
  number = 	"3",
  pages = 	"317--341",
  keywords = 	"Digital Services Act (DSA); e-Commerce Directive; hosting service providers; intermediary liability; notice and action",
  abstract = 	"Over the past two decades the principle of knowledge-based liability has been the backbone of the EU's regime regulating the liability of social media companies, online marketplaces, cloud storage providers and many other online service providers that store and disseminate user-generated content. This article traces the origins, identifies the rationale, assesses the continued relevance and discusses the main strengths and shortcomings of this approach. It is argued that, counter-intuitive as it may seem to some, there are good grounds for retaining the key features of the current liability system, which conditionally shields such service providers from liability for their users' content. Most important is the system's ability to strike a fair balance between the conflicting rights and interests of the parties involved -- not only the service providers and the users, but also the parties aggrieved by the content. That is not to say, however, that the system has no shortcomings. In particular, the system's effectiveness in terms of tackling illegal user content causing serious `public' harm could be improved, whilst the system also involves significant risks of unjustified removal of user content. These shortcomings do not mean that the current knowledge-based liability system should be discarded. Instead, it should be improved. Not by excluding certain service providers from the scope of the liability exemption or adding conditions, but rather by enacting complementary requirements. Against this background the article assesses to what extent the recently proposed Digital Services Act addresses the identified shortcomings.",
  issn = 	"2190-3387",
  url = 	"http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-53432"
}

Download

RIS

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Wilman, Folkert
PY  - 2021
DA  - 2021//
TI  - The EU’s system of knowledge-based liability for hosting service providers in respect of illegal user content – between the e-Commerce Directive and the Digital Services Act
JO  - JIPITEC
SP  - 317
EP  - 341
VL  - 12
IS  - 3
KW  - Digital Services Act (DSA)
KW  - e-Commerce Directive
KW  - hosting service providers
KW  - intermediary liability
KW  - notice and action
AB  - Over the past two decades the principle of knowledge-based liability has been the backbone of the EU’s regime regulating the liability of social media companies, online marketplaces, cloud storage providers and many other online service providers that store and disseminate user-generated content. This article traces the origins, identifies the rationale, assesses the continued relevance and discusses the main strengths and shortcomings of this approach. It is argued that, counter-intuitive as it may seem to some, there are good grounds for retaining the key features of the current liability system, which conditionally shields such service providers from liability for their users’ content. Most important is the system’s ability to strike a fair balance between the conflicting rights and interests of the parties involved – not only the service providers and the users, but also the parties aggrieved by the content. That is not to say, however, that the system has no shortcomings. In particular, the system’s effectiveness in terms of tackling illegal user content causing serious ‘public’ harm could be improved, whilst the system also involves significant risks of unjustified removal of user content. These shortcomings do not mean that the current knowledge-based liability system should be discarded. Instead, it should be improved. Not by excluding certain service providers from the scope of the liability exemption or adding conditions, but rather by enacting complementary requirements. Against this background the article assesses to what extent the recently proposed Digital Services Act addresses the identified shortcomings.
SN  - 2190-3387
UR  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-53432
ID  - wilman2021
ER  - 
Download

Wordbib

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography"  xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" >
<b:Source>
<b:Tag>wilman2021</b:Tag>
<b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType>
<b:Year>2021</b:Year>
<b:PeriodicalTitle>JIPITEC</b:PeriodicalTitle>
<b:Volume>12</b:Volume>
<b:Issue>3</b:Issue>
<b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-53432</b:Url>
<b:Pages>317-341</b:Pages>
<b:Author>
<b:Author><b:NameList>
<b:Person><b:Last>Wilman</b:Last><b:First>Folkert</b:First></b:Person>
</b:NameList></b:Author>
</b:Author>
<b:Title>The EU’s system of knowledge-based liability for hosting service providers in respect of illegal user content – between the e-Commerce Directive and the Digital Services Act</b:Title>
<b:Comments>Over the past two decades the principle of knowledge-based liability has been the backbone of the EU’s regime regulating the liability of social media companies, online marketplaces, cloud storage providers and many other online service providers that store and disseminate user-generated content. This article traces the origins, identifies the rationale, assesses the continued relevance and discusses the main strengths and shortcomings of this approach. It is argued that, counter-intuitive as it may seem to some, there are good grounds for retaining the key features of the current liability system, which conditionally shields such service providers from liability for their users’ content. Most important is the system’s ability to strike a fair balance between the conflicting rights and interests of the parties involved – not only the service providers and the users, but also the parties aggrieved by the content. That is not to say, however, that the system has no shortcomings. In particular, the system’s effectiveness in terms of tackling illegal user content causing serious ‘public’ harm could be improved, whilst the system also involves significant risks of unjustified removal of user content. These shortcomings do not mean that the current knowledge-based liability system should be discarded. Instead, it should be improved. Not by excluding certain service providers from the scope of the liability exemption or adding conditions, but rather by enacting complementary requirements. Against this background the article assesses to what extent the recently proposed Digital Services Act addresses the identified shortcomings.</b:Comments>
</b:Source>
</b:Sources>
Download

ISI

PT Journal
AU Wilman, F
TI The EU’s system of knowledge-based liability for hosting service providers in respect of illegal user content – between the e-Commerce Directive and the Digital Services Act
SO JIPITEC
PY 2021
BP 317
EP 341
VL 12
IS 3
DE Digital Services Act (DSA); e-Commerce Directive; hosting service providers; intermediary liability; notice and action
AB Over the past two decades the principle of knowledge-based liability has been the backbone of the EU’s regime regulating the liability of social media companies, online marketplaces, cloud storage providers and many other online service providers that store and disseminate user-generated content. This article traces the origins, identifies the rationale, assesses the continued relevance and discusses the main strengths and shortcomings of this approach. It is argued that, counter-intuitive as it may seem to some, there are good grounds for retaining the key features of the current liability system, which conditionally shields such service providers from liability for their users’ content. Most important is the system’s ability to strike a fair balance between the conflicting rights and interests of the parties involved – not only the service providers and the users, but also the parties aggrieved by the content. That is not to say, however, that the system has no shortcomings. In particular, the system’s effectiveness in terms of tackling illegal user content causing serious ‘public’ harm could be improved, whilst the system also involves significant risks of unjustified removal of user content. These shortcomings do not mean that the current knowledge-based liability system should be discarded. Instead, it should be improved. Not by excluding certain service providers from the scope of the liability exemption or adding conditions, but rather by enacting complementary requirements. Against this background the article assesses to what extent the recently proposed Digital Services Act addresses the identified shortcomings.
ER

Download

Mods

<mods>
  <titleInfo>
    <title>The EU’s system of knowledge-based liability for hosting service providers in respect of illegal user content – between the e-Commerce Directive and the Digital Services Act</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart type="family">Wilman</namePart>
    <namePart type="given">Folkert</namePart>
  </name>
  <abstract>Over the past two decades the principle of knowledge-based liability has been the backbone of the EU’s regime regulating the liability of social media companies, online marketplaces, cloud storage providers and many other online service providers that store and disseminate user-generated content. This article traces the origins, identifies the rationale, assesses the continued relevance and discusses the main strengths and shortcomings of this approach. It is argued that, counter-intuitive as it may seem to some, there are good grounds for retaining the key features of the current liability system, which conditionally shields such service providers from liability for their users’ content. Most important is the system’s ability to strike a fair balance between the conflicting rights and interests of the parties involved – not only the service providers and the users, but also the parties aggrieved by the content. That is not to say, however, that the system has no shortcomings. In particular, the system’s effectiveness in terms of tackling illegal user content causing serious ‘public’ harm could be improved, whilst the system also involves significant risks of unjustified removal of user content. These shortcomings do not mean that the current knowledge-based liability system should be discarded. Instead, it should be improved. Not by excluding certain service providers from the scope of the liability exemption or adding conditions, but rather by enacting complementary requirements. Against this background the article assesses to what extent the recently proposed Digital Services Act addresses the identified shortcomings.</abstract>
  <subject>
    <topic>Digital Services Act (DSA)</topic>
    <topic>e-Commerce Directive</topic>
    <topic>hosting service providers</topic>
    <topic>intermediary liability</topic>
    <topic>notice and action</topic>
  </subject>
  <classification authority="ddc">340</classification>
  <relatedItem type="host">
    <genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
    <genre>academic journal</genre>
    <titleInfo>
      <title>JIPITEC</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <part>
      <detail type="volume">
        <number>12</number>
      </detail>
      <detail type="issue">
        <number>3</number>
      </detail>
      <date>2021</date>
      <extent unit="page">
        <start>317</start>
        <end>341</end>
      </extent>
    </part>
  </relatedItem>
  <identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier>
  <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-53432</identifier>
  <identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-53432</identifier>
  <identifier type="citekey">wilman2021</identifier>
</mods>
Download

Full Metadata

JIPITEC – Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law
Article search
Extended article search
Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter
Follow Us
twitter
 
Navigation