Document Actions
Citation and metadata
Recommended citation
Peter Rott, The Digitalisation Of Cars And The New Digital Consumer Contract Law, 12 (2021) JIPITEC 156 para 1.
Download Citation
Endnote
%0 Journal Article %T The Digitalisation Of Cars And The New Digital Consumer Contract Law %A Rott, Peter %J JIPITEC %D 2021 %V 12 %N 2 %@ 2190-3387 %F rott2021 %X Cars are paradigmatic for the digitalisation of goods. Therefore, smart cars are chosen as an example to illustrate the application of the new rules of the Sale of Goods Directive (EU) 2019/771 and the Digital Content and Services Directive (EU) 2019/770 to goods with digital elements and to goods with incorporated and inter-connected digital content or services as supplied by the trader or by third parties. The article flags the demarcation between the two Directives and discusses potential grounds for non-conformity of smart cars with the contract. It then focuses on the consequences that the inclusion of incorporated and inter-connected digital content or services may have on the remedies that the consumer has available. It also briefly touches on the issue of damages that may be of great relevance in practice but that the two Directives do not tackle. The article concludes that although the allocation of liability with the seller would seem to make the consumer’s life easier, different rules for hardware and digital content and services within the Sale of Goods Directive can lead to complications. The parallel application of the Sale of Goods Directive and the Digital Content and Services Directive exacerbates this issue where the consumer acquires digital content and services separately. Vice versa, the seller would seem to have a vital interest to not have many third parties (beyond the manufacturer) being involved with the car, if only for reasons of cybersecurity. %L 340 %K Digital Content and Services Directive %K Goods with digital elements %K Incorporated and inter-connected digital content or services %K Sale of Goods Directive %K Smart car %K burden of proof %U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-53013 %P 156-NoneDownload
Bibtex
@Article{rott2021,
author = "Rott, Peter",
title = "The Digitalisation Of Cars And The New Digital Consumer Contract Law",
journal = "JIPITEC",
year = "2021",
volume = "12",
number = "2",
pages = "156--None",
keywords = "Digital Content and Services Directive; Goods with digital elements; Incorporated and inter-connected digital content or services; Sale of Goods Directive; Smart car; burden of proof",
abstract = "Cars are paradigmatic for the digitalisation of goods. Therefore, smart cars are chosen as an example to illustrate the application of the new rules of the Sale of Goods Directive (EU) 2019/771 and the Digital Content and Services Directive (EU) 2019/770 to goods with digital elements and to goods with incorporated and inter-connected digital content or services as supplied by the trader or by third parties. The article flags the demarcation between the two Directives and discusses potential grounds for non-conformity of smart cars with the contract. It then focuses on the consequences that the inclusion of incorporated and inter-connected digital content or services may have on the remedies that the consumer has available. It also briefly touches on the issue of damages that may be of great relevance in practice but that the two Directives do not tackle. The article concludes that although the allocation of liability with the seller would seem to make the consumer's life easier, different rules for hardware and digital content and services within the Sale of Goods Directive can lead to complications. The parallel application of the Sale of Goods Directive and the Digital Content and Services Directive exacerbates this issue where the consumer acquires digital content and services separately. Vice versa, the seller would seem to have a vital interest to not have many third parties (beyond the manufacturer) being involved with the car, if only for reasons of cybersecurity.",
issn = "2190-3387",
url = "http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-53013"
}
Download
RIS
TY - JOUR AU - Rott, Peter PY - 2021 DA - 2021// TI - The Digitalisation Of Cars And The New Digital Consumer Contract Law JO - JIPITEC SP - 156 EP - None VL - 12 IS - 2 KW - Digital Content and Services Directive KW - Goods with digital elements KW - Incorporated and inter-connected digital content or services KW - Sale of Goods Directive KW - Smart car KW - burden of proof AB - Cars are paradigmatic for the digitalisation of goods. Therefore, smart cars are chosen as an example to illustrate the application of the new rules of the Sale of Goods Directive (EU) 2019/771 and the Digital Content and Services Directive (EU) 2019/770 to goods with digital elements and to goods with incorporated and inter-connected digital content or services as supplied by the trader or by third parties. The article flags the demarcation between the two Directives and discusses potential grounds for non-conformity of smart cars with the contract. It then focuses on the consequences that the inclusion of incorporated and inter-connected digital content or services may have on the remedies that the consumer has available. It also briefly touches on the issue of damages that may be of great relevance in practice but that the two Directives do not tackle. The article concludes that although the allocation of liability with the seller would seem to make the consumer’s life easier, different rules for hardware and digital content and services within the Sale of Goods Directive can lead to complications. The parallel application of the Sale of Goods Directive and the Digital Content and Services Directive exacerbates this issue where the consumer acquires digital content and services separately. Vice versa, the seller would seem to have a vital interest to not have many third parties (beyond the manufacturer) being involved with the car, if only for reasons of cybersecurity. SN - 2190-3387 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-53013 ID - rott2021 ER -Download
Wordbib
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" > <b:Source> <b:Tag>rott2021</b:Tag> <b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType> <b:Year>2021</b:Year> <b:PeriodicalTitle>JIPITEC</b:PeriodicalTitle> <b:Volume>12</b:Volume> <b:Issue>2</b:Issue> <b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-53013</b:Url> <b:Pages>156-None</b:Pages> <b:Author> <b:Author><b:NameList> <b:Person><b:Last>Rott</b:Last><b:First>Peter</b:First></b:Person> </b:NameList></b:Author> </b:Author> <b:Title>The Digitalisation Of Cars And The New Digital Consumer Contract Law</b:Title> <b:Comments>Cars are paradigmatic for the digitalisation of goods. Therefore, smart cars are chosen as an example to illustrate the application of the new rules of the Sale of Goods Directive (EU) 2019/771 and the Digital Content and Services Directive (EU) 2019/770 to goods with digital elements and to goods with incorporated and inter-connected digital content or services as supplied by the trader or by third parties. The article flags the demarcation between the two Directives and discusses potential grounds for non-conformity of smart cars with the contract. It then focuses on the consequences that the inclusion of incorporated and inter-connected digital content or services may have on the remedies that the consumer has available. It also briefly touches on the issue of damages that may be of great relevance in practice but that the two Directives do not tackle. The article concludes that although the allocation of liability with the seller would seem to make the consumer’s life easier, different rules for hardware and digital content and services within the Sale of Goods Directive can lead to complications. The parallel application of the Sale of Goods Directive and the Digital Content and Services Directive exacerbates this issue where the consumer acquires digital content and services separately. Vice versa, the seller would seem to have a vital interest to not have many third parties (beyond the manufacturer) being involved with the car, if only for reasons of cybersecurity.</b:Comments> </b:Source> </b:Sources>Download
ISI
PT Journal AU Rott, P TI The Digitalisation Of Cars And The New Digital Consumer Contract Law SO JIPITEC PY 2021 BP 156 EP None VL 12 IS 2 DE Digital Content and Services Directive; Goods with digital elements; Incorporated and inter-connected digital content or services; Sale of Goods Directive; Smart car; burden of proof AB Cars are paradigmatic for the digitalisation of goods. Therefore, smart cars are chosen as an example to illustrate the application of the new rules of the Sale of Goods Directive (EU) 2019/771 and the Digital Content and Services Directive (EU) 2019/770 to goods with digital elements and to goods with incorporated and inter-connected digital content or services as supplied by the trader or by third parties. The article flags the demarcation between the two Directives and discusses potential grounds for non-conformity of smart cars with the contract. It then focuses on the consequences that the inclusion of incorporated and inter-connected digital content or services may have on the remedies that the consumer has available. It also briefly touches on the issue of damages that may be of great relevance in practice but that the two Directives do not tackle. The article concludes that although the allocation of liability with the seller would seem to make the consumer’s life easier, different rules for hardware and digital content and services within the Sale of Goods Directive can lead to complications. The parallel application of the Sale of Goods Directive and the Digital Content and Services Directive exacerbates this issue where the consumer acquires digital content and services separately. Vice versa, the seller would seem to have a vital interest to not have many third parties (beyond the manufacturer) being involved with the car, if only for reasons of cybersecurity. ERDownload
Mods
<mods>
<titleInfo>
<title>The Digitalisation Of Cars And The New Digital Consumer Contract Law</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="family">Rott</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Peter</namePart>
</name>
<abstract>Cars are paradigmatic for the digitalisation of goods. Therefore, smart cars are chosen as an example to illustrate the application of the new rules of the Sale of Goods Directive (EU) 2019/771 and the Digital Content and Services Directive (EU) 2019/770 to goods with digital elements and to goods with incorporated and inter-connected digital content or services as supplied by the trader or by third parties. The article flags the demarcation between the two Directives and discusses potential grounds for non-conformity of smart cars with the contract. It then focuses on the consequences that the inclusion of incorporated and inter-connected digital content or services may have on the remedies that the consumer has available. It also briefly touches on the issue of damages that may be of great relevance in practice but that the two Directives do not tackle. The article concludes that although the allocation of liability with the seller would seem to make the consumer’s life easier, different rules for hardware and digital content and services within the Sale of Goods Directive can lead to complications. The parallel application of the Sale of Goods Directive and the Digital Content and Services Directive exacerbates this issue where the consumer acquires digital content and services separately. Vice versa, the seller would seem to have a vital interest to not have many third parties (beyond the manufacturer) being involved with the car, if only for reasons of cybersecurity.</abstract>
<subject>
<topic>Digital Content and Services Directive</topic>
<topic>Goods with digital elements</topic>
<topic>Incorporated and inter-connected digital content or services</topic>
<topic>Sale of Goods Directive</topic>
<topic>Smart car</topic>
<topic>burden of proof</topic>
</subject>
<classification authority="ddc">340</classification>
<relatedItem type="host">
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<genre>academic journal</genre>
<titleInfo>
<title>JIPITEC</title>
</titleInfo>
<part>
<detail type="volume">
<number>12</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<number>2</number>
</detail>
<date>2021</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>156</start>
<end>None</end>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier>
<identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-53013</identifier>
<identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-53013</identifier>
<identifier type="citekey">rott2021</identifier>
</mods>
Download
Full Metadata
| Bibliographic Citation | Journal of intellectual property, information technology and electronic commerce law 12 (2021) 2 |
|---|---|
| Title |
The Digitalisation Of Cars And The New Digital Consumer Contract Law (eng) |
| Author | Peter Rott |
| Language | eng |
| Abstract | Cars are paradigmatic for the digitalisation of goods. Therefore, smart cars are chosen as an example to illustrate the application of the new rules of the Sale of Goods Directive (EU) 2019/771 and the Digital Content and Services Directive (EU) 2019/770 to goods with digital elements and to goods with incorporated and inter-connected digital content or services as supplied by the trader or by third parties. The article flags the demarcation between the two Directives and discusses potential grounds for non-conformity of smart cars with the contract. It then focuses on the consequences that the inclusion of incorporated and inter-connected digital content or services may have on the remedies that the consumer has available. It also briefly touches on the issue of damages that may be of great relevance in practice but that the two Directives do not tackle. The article concludes that although the allocation of liability with the seller would seem to make the consumer’s life easier, different rules for hardware and digital content and services within the Sale of Goods Directive can lead to complications. The parallel application of the Sale of Goods Directive and the Digital Content and Services Directive exacerbates this issue where the consumer acquires digital content and services separately. Vice versa, the seller would seem to have a vital interest to not have many third parties (beyond the manufacturer) being involved with the car, if only for reasons of cybersecurity. |
| Subject | Digital Content and Services Directive, Goods with digital elements, Incorporated and inter-connected digital content or services, Sale of Goods Directive, Smart car, burden of proof |
| DDC | 340 |
| Rights | DPPL |
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:0009-29-53013 |
