Document Actions
Citation and metadata
Recommended citation
Tristan Radtke, The concept of Joint Control under the Data Protection Law Enforcement Directive 2016/680 in contrast to the GDPR, 11 (2021) JIPITEC 242 para 1.
Download Citation
Endnote
%0 Journal Article %T The concept of Joint Control under the Data Protection Law Enforcement Directive 2016/680 in contrast to the GDPR %A Radtke, Tristan %J JIPITEC %D 2021 %V 11 %N 3 %@ 2190-3387 %F radtke2021 %X While the EU General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 (hereinafter the GDPR) is on everyone's lips, the EU Data Protection Law Enforcement Directive 2016/680 (hereinafter the LED) exhibits a rather shadowy existence. This also applies with regard to the concept of multiple controllers determining purposes and means of data processing activities (Joint Control). The LED requires the Member States to implement a Joint Control concept similar to the concept set out under the GDPR. Differences between the Joint Control concepts under the GDPR and LED lie in the details, but at the same time they are significant and representative of the specifics and particular aims of the LED compared to the GDPR. The following article discusses the objectives of the LED and the Joint Control concept and explains them on the basis of the differences between the provisions related to Joint Control (Art. 26 GDPR and Art. 21 LED). In addition, collisions of application of GDPR and LED and its impact on Joint Controllers are discussed.* %L 340 %K Data Protection %K GDPR %K Joint Control %K LED %U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-51896 %P 242-252Download
Bibtex
@Article{radtke2021,
author = "Radtke, Tristan",
title = "The concept of Joint Control under the Data Protection Law Enforcement Directive 2016/680 in contrast to the GDPR",
journal = "JIPITEC",
year = "2021",
volume = "11",
number = "3",
pages = "242--252",
keywords = "Data Protection; GDPR; Joint Control; LED",
abstract = "While the EU General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 (hereinafter the GDPR) is on everyone's lips, the EU Data Protection Law Enforcement Directive 2016/680 (hereinafter the LED) exhibits a rather shadowy existence. This also applies with regard to the concept of multiple controllers determining purposes and means of data processing activities (Joint Control). The LED requires the Member States to implement a Joint Control concept similar to the concept set out under the GDPR. Differences between the Joint Control concepts under the GDPR and LED lie in the details, but at the same time they are significant and representative of the specifics and particular aims of the LED compared to the GDPR. The following article discusses the objectives of the LED and the Joint Control concept and explains them on the basis of the differences between the provisions related to Joint Control (Art. 26 GDPR and Art. 21 LED). In addition, collisions of application of GDPR and LED and its impact on Joint Controllers are discussed.*",
issn = "2190-3387",
url = "http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-51896"
}
Download
RIS
TY - JOUR AU - Radtke, Tristan PY - 2021 DA - 2021// TI - The concept of Joint Control under the Data Protection Law Enforcement Directive 2016/680 in contrast to the GDPR JO - JIPITEC SP - 242 EP - 252 VL - 11 IS - 3 KW - Data Protection KW - GDPR KW - Joint Control KW - LED AB - While the EU General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 (hereinafter the GDPR) is on everyone's lips, the EU Data Protection Law Enforcement Directive 2016/680 (hereinafter the LED) exhibits a rather shadowy existence. This also applies with regard to the concept of multiple controllers determining purposes and means of data processing activities (Joint Control). The LED requires the Member States to implement a Joint Control concept similar to the concept set out under the GDPR. Differences between the Joint Control concepts under the GDPR and LED lie in the details, but at the same time they are significant and representative of the specifics and particular aims of the LED compared to the GDPR. The following article discusses the objectives of the LED and the Joint Control concept and explains them on the basis of the differences between the provisions related to Joint Control (Art. 26 GDPR and Art. 21 LED). In addition, collisions of application of GDPR and LED and its impact on Joint Controllers are discussed.* SN - 2190-3387 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-51896 ID - radtke2021 ER -Download
Wordbib
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" > <b:Source> <b:Tag>radtke2021</b:Tag> <b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType> <b:Year>2021</b:Year> <b:PeriodicalTitle>JIPITEC</b:PeriodicalTitle> <b:Volume>11</b:Volume> <b:Issue>3</b:Issue> <b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-51896</b:Url> <b:Pages>242-252</b:Pages> <b:Author> <b:Author><b:NameList> <b:Person><b:Last>Radtke</b:Last><b:First>Tristan</b:First></b:Person> </b:NameList></b:Author> </b:Author> <b:Title>The concept of Joint Control under the Data Protection Law Enforcement Directive 2016/680 in contrast to the GDPR</b:Title> <b:Comments>While the EU General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 (hereinafter the GDPR) is on everyone's lips, the EU Data Protection Law Enforcement Directive 2016/680 (hereinafter the LED) exhibits a rather shadowy existence. This also applies with regard to the concept of multiple controllers determining purposes and means of data processing activities (Joint Control). The LED requires the Member States to implement a Joint Control concept similar to the concept set out under the GDPR. Differences between the Joint Control concepts under the GDPR and LED lie in the details, but at the same time they are significant and representative of the specifics and particular aims of the LED compared to the GDPR. The following article discusses the objectives of the LED and the Joint Control concept and explains them on the basis of the differences between the provisions related to Joint Control (Art. 26 GDPR and Art. 21 LED). In addition, collisions of application of GDPR and LED and its impact on Joint Controllers are discussed.*</b:Comments> </b:Source> </b:Sources>Download
ISI
PT Journal AU Radtke, T TI The concept of Joint Control under the Data Protection Law Enforcement Directive 2016/680 in contrast to the GDPR SO JIPITEC PY 2021 BP 242 EP 252 VL 11 IS 3 DE Data Protection; GDPR; Joint Control; LED AB While the EU General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 (hereinafter the GDPR) is on everyone's lips, the EU Data Protection Law Enforcement Directive 2016/680 (hereinafter the LED) exhibits a rather shadowy existence. This also applies with regard to the concept of multiple controllers determining purposes and means of data processing activities (Joint Control). The LED requires the Member States to implement a Joint Control concept similar to the concept set out under the GDPR. Differences between the Joint Control concepts under the GDPR and LED lie in the details, but at the same time they are significant and representative of the specifics and particular aims of the LED compared to the GDPR. The following article discusses the objectives of the LED and the Joint Control concept and explains them on the basis of the differences between the provisions related to Joint Control (Art. 26 GDPR and Art. 21 LED). In addition, collisions of application of GDPR and LED and its impact on Joint Controllers are discussed.* ERDownload
Mods
<mods>
<titleInfo>
<title>The concept of Joint Control under the Data Protection Law Enforcement Directive 2016/680 in contrast to the GDPR</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="family">Radtke</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Tristan</namePart>
</name>
<abstract>While the EU General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 (hereinafter the GDPR) is on everyone's lips, the EU Data Protection Law Enforcement Directive 2016/680 (hereinafter the LED) exhibits a rather shadowy existence. This also applies with regard to the concept of multiple controllers determining purposes and means of data processing activities (Joint Control). The LED requires the Member States to implement a Joint Control concept similar to the concept set out under the GDPR. Differences between the Joint Control concepts under the GDPR and LED lie in the details, but at the same time they are significant and representative of the specifics and particular aims of the LED compared to the GDPR. The following article discusses the objectives of the LED and the Joint Control concept and explains them on the basis of the differences between the provisions related to Joint Control (Art. 26 GDPR and Art. 21 LED). In addition, collisions of application of GDPR and LED and its impact on Joint Controllers are discussed.*</abstract>
<subject>
<topic>Data Protection</topic>
<topic>GDPR</topic>
<topic>Joint Control</topic>
<topic>LED</topic>
</subject>
<classification authority="ddc">340</classification>
<relatedItem type="host">
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<genre>academic journal</genre>
<titleInfo>
<title>JIPITEC</title>
</titleInfo>
<part>
<detail type="volume">
<number>11</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<number>3</number>
</detail>
<date>2021</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>242</start>
<end>252</end>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier>
<identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-51896</identifier>
<identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-51896</identifier>
<identifier type="citekey">radtke2021</identifier>
</mods>
Download
Full Metadata
| Bibliographic Citation | Journal of intellectual property, information technology and electronic commerce law 11 (2021) 3 |
|---|---|
| Title |
The concept of Joint Control under the Data Protection Law Enforcement Directive 2016/680 in contrast to the GDPR (eng) |
| Author | Tristan Radtke |
| Language | eng |
| Abstract | While the EU General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 (hereinafter the GDPR) is on everyone's lips, the EU Data Protection Law Enforcement Directive 2016/680 (hereinafter the LED) exhibits a rather shadowy existence. This also applies with regard to the concept of multiple controllers determining purposes and means of data processing activities (Joint Control). The LED requires the Member States to implement a Joint Control concept similar to the concept set out under the GDPR. Differences between the Joint Control concepts under the GDPR and LED lie in the details, but at the same time they are significant and representative of the specifics and particular aims of the LED compared to the GDPR. The following article discusses the objectives of the LED and the Joint Control concept and explains them on the basis of the differences between the provisions related to Joint Control (Art. 26 GDPR and Art. 21 LED). In addition, collisions of application of GDPR and LED and its impact on Joint Controllers are discussed.* |
| Subject | Data Protection, GDPR, Joint Control, LED |
| DDC | 340 |
| Rights | DPPL |
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:0009-29-51896 |
