Document Actions
Citation and metadata
Recommended citation
Andreas Rahmatian, Debts, Money, Intellectual Property, Data and the Concept of Dematerialised Property, 11 (2020) JIPITEC 186 para 1.
Download Citation
Endnote
%0 Journal Article %T Debts, Money, Intellectual Property, Data and the Concept of Dematerialised Property %A Rahmatian, Andreas %J JIPITEC %D 2020 %V 11 %N 2 %@ 2190-3387 %F rahmatian2020 %X Debts, (electronic) money, intellectual property, and, in principle, data and digitised objects (if ownership rights are to be recognised for these), can be conceptualised as versions of the general principle of dematerialised property. This article discusses first the concept of dematerialised property and its application to debts, money and intellectual property. Then it deals with the idea of ownership of data within traditional property concepts. While data ownership can theoretically be accommodated fairly easily within the framework of dematerialised property, there are several reasons, both theoretical and from a legal policy perspective, which make the introduction of data ownership modelled upon conventional (intellectual) property rights problematic. %L 340 %K data ownership %K dematerialised property %K intellectual property theory %K money creation %U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-50973 %P 186-199Download
Bibtex
@Article{rahmatian2020,
author = "Rahmatian, Andreas",
title = "Debts, Money, Intellectual Property, Data and the Concept of Dematerialised Property",
journal = "JIPITEC",
year = "2020",
volume = "11",
number = "2",
pages = "186--199",
keywords = "data ownership; dematerialised property; intellectual property theory; money creation",
abstract = "Debts, (electronic) money, intellectual property, and, in principle, data and digitised objects (if ownership rights are to be recognised for these), can be conceptualised as versions of the general principle of dematerialised property. This article discusses first the concept of dematerialised property and its application to debts, money and intellectual property. Then it deals with the idea of ownership of data within traditional property concepts. While data ownership can theoretically be accommodated fairly easily within the framework of dematerialised property, there are several reasons, both theoretical and from a legal policy perspective, which make the introduction of data ownership modelled upon conventional (intellectual) property rights problematic.",
issn = "2190-3387",
url = "http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-50973"
}
Download
RIS
TY - JOUR AU - Rahmatian, Andreas PY - 2020 DA - 2020// TI - Debts, Money, Intellectual Property, Data and the Concept of Dematerialised Property JO - JIPITEC SP - 186 EP - 199 VL - 11 IS - 2 KW - data ownership KW - dematerialised property KW - intellectual property theory KW - money creation AB - Debts, (electronic) money, intellectual property, and, in principle, data and digitised objects (if ownership rights are to be recognised for these), can be conceptualised as versions of the general principle of dematerialised property. This article discusses first the concept of dematerialised property and its application to debts, money and intellectual property. Then it deals with the idea of ownership of data within traditional property concepts. While data ownership can theoretically be accommodated fairly easily within the framework of dematerialised property, there are several reasons, both theoretical and from a legal policy perspective, which make the introduction of data ownership modelled upon conventional (intellectual) property rights problematic. SN - 2190-3387 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-50973 ID - rahmatian2020 ER -Download
Wordbib
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" > <b:Source> <b:Tag>rahmatian2020</b:Tag> <b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType> <b:Year>2020</b:Year> <b:PeriodicalTitle>JIPITEC</b:PeriodicalTitle> <b:Volume>11</b:Volume> <b:Issue>2</b:Issue> <b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-50973</b:Url> <b:Pages>186-199</b:Pages> <b:Author> <b:Author><b:NameList> <b:Person><b:Last>Rahmatian</b:Last><b:First>Andreas</b:First></b:Person> </b:NameList></b:Author> </b:Author> <b:Title>Debts, Money, Intellectual Property, Data and the Concept of Dematerialised Property</b:Title> <b:Comments>Debts, (electronic) money, intellectual property, and, in principle, data and digitised objects (if ownership rights are to be recognised for these), can be conceptualised as versions of the general principle of dematerialised property. This article discusses first the concept of dematerialised property and its application to debts, money and intellectual property. Then it deals with the idea of ownership of data within traditional property concepts. While data ownership can theoretically be accommodated fairly easily within the framework of dematerialised property, there are several reasons, both theoretical and from a legal policy perspective, which make the introduction of data ownership modelled upon conventional (intellectual) property rights problematic.</b:Comments> </b:Source> </b:Sources>Download
ISI
PT Journal AU Rahmatian, A TI Debts, Money, Intellectual Property, Data and the Concept of Dematerialised Property SO JIPITEC PY 2020 BP 186 EP 199 VL 11 IS 2 DE data ownership; dematerialised property; intellectual property theory; money creation AB Debts, (electronic) money, intellectual property, and, in principle, data and digitised objects (if ownership rights are to be recognised for these), can be conceptualised as versions of the general principle of dematerialised property. This article discusses first the concept of dematerialised property and its application to debts, money and intellectual property. Then it deals with the idea of ownership of data within traditional property concepts. While data ownership can theoretically be accommodated fairly easily within the framework of dematerialised property, there are several reasons, both theoretical and from a legal policy perspective, which make the introduction of data ownership modelled upon conventional (intellectual) property rights problematic. ERDownload
Mods
<mods>
<titleInfo>
<title>Debts, Money, Intellectual Property, Data and the Concept of Dematerialised Property</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="family">Rahmatian</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Andreas</namePart>
</name>
<abstract>Debts, (electronic) money, intellectual property, and, in principle, data and digitised objects (if ownership rights are to be recognised for these), can be conceptualised as versions of the general principle of dematerialised property. This article discusses first the concept of dematerialised property and its application to debts, money and intellectual property. Then it deals with the idea of ownership of data within traditional property concepts. While data ownership can theoretically be accommodated fairly easily within the framework of dematerialised property, there are several reasons, both theoretical and from a legal policy perspective, which make the introduction of data ownership modelled upon conventional (intellectual) property rights problematic.</abstract>
<subject>
<topic>data ownership</topic>
<topic>dematerialised property</topic>
<topic>intellectual property theory</topic>
<topic>money creation</topic>
</subject>
<classification authority="ddc">340</classification>
<relatedItem type="host">
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<genre>academic journal</genre>
<titleInfo>
<title>JIPITEC</title>
</titleInfo>
<part>
<detail type="volume">
<number>11</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<number>2</number>
</detail>
<date>2020</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>186</start>
<end>199</end>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier>
<identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-50973</identifier>
<identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-50973</identifier>
<identifier type="citekey">rahmatian2020</identifier>
</mods>
Download
Full Metadata
| Bibliographic Citation | Journal of intellectual property, information technology and electronic commerce law 11 (2020) 2 |
|---|---|
| Title |
Debts, Money, Intellectual Property, Data and the Concept of Dematerialised Property (eng) |
| Author | Andreas Rahmatian |
| Language | eng |
| Abstract | Debts, (electronic) money, intellectual property, and, in principle, data and digitised objects (if ownership rights are to be recognised for these), can be conceptualised as versions of the general principle of dematerialised property. This article discusses first the concept of dematerialised property and its application to debts, money and intellectual property. Then it deals with the idea of ownership of data within traditional property concepts. While data ownership can theoretically be accommodated fairly easily within the framework of dematerialised property, there are several reasons, both theoretical and from a legal policy perspective, which make the introduction of data ownership modelled upon conventional (intellectual) property rights problematic. |
| Subject | data ownership, dematerialised property, intellectual property theory, money creation |
| DDC | 340 |
| Rights | DPPL |
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:0009-29-50973 |
