Citation and metadata
Recommended citation
Santiago Ramírez López, Informing Consent: Giving Control Back to the Data Subject from a Behavioral Economics Perspective, 9 (2018) JIPITEC 35 para 1.
Download Citation
Endnote
%0 Journal Article %T Informing Consent: Giving Control Back to the Data Subject from a Behavioral Economics Perspective %A Ramírez López, Santiago %J JIPITEC %D 2018 %V 9 %N 1 %@ 2190-3387 %F ramírez lópez2018 %X The development of data privacy legislation in Europe and America has been highly influenced by the idea that individuals must maintain the autonomy to take decisions regarding the general purpose and uses of their personal data; an idea that has been generally instrumentalized with the mechanism of informed con-sent. Recently, both companies and researchers in the field have criticized this idea, arguing that with the new advances and technological progress, consent has lost importance due to the ubiquity of the data processing and the absence of real participation of the data subjects. This article seeks to take into account both points of view, by recognizing the importance of the autonomy of individuals to determine the destination of their personal data, but also by understanding the practical implications and the impossibilities derived from obtaining an informed consent from data subjects that are generally unfamiliar with the topic. Based on the analyses regarding the difficulties of obtaining an effective and informed consent, this contribution will examine how some of the bias and impasses stud-ied through the discipline of behavioral economics may help us to understand the current problems in relation to the way in which consent is requested and provid-ed by the data subjects. This contribution concludes by proposing alternatives that seek to overcome these biases and impasses with an easier provision of infor-mation of the data processing and the implementation of a data management and a value-oriented model, which would benefit the data subjects. %L 340 %K Behavioral economics %K Data Privacy %K Data Protection %K General Data Protection Regulation %K Informational self-determination %K Informed consent %U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-46780 %P 35-50Download
Bibtex
@Article{ramírezlópez2018, author = "Ram{\'i}rez L{\'o}pez, Santiago", title = "Informing Consent: Giving Control Back to the Data Subject from a Behavioral Economics Perspective", journal = "JIPITEC", year = "2018", volume = "9", number = "1", pages = "35--50", keywords = "Behavioral economics; Data Privacy; Data Protection; General Data Protection Regulation; Informational self-determination; Informed consent", abstract = "The development of data privacy legislation in Europe and America has been highly influenced by the idea that individuals must maintain the autonomy to take decisions regarding the general purpose and uses of their personal data; an idea that has been generally instrumentalized with the mechanism of informed con-sent. Recently, both companies and researchers in the field have criticized this idea, arguing that with the new advances and technological progress, consent has lost importance due to the ubiquity of the data processing and the absence of real participation of the data subjects. This article seeks to take into account both points of view, by recognizing the importance of the autonomy of individuals to determine the destination of their personal data, but also by understanding the practical implications and the impossibilities derived from obtaining an informed consent from data subjects that are generally unfamiliar with the topic. Based on the analyses regarding the difficulties of obtaining an effective and informed consent, this contribution will examine how some of the bias and impasses stud-ied through the discipline of behavioral economics may help us to understand the current problems in relation to the way in which consent is requested and provid-ed by the data subjects. This contribution concludes by proposing alternatives that seek to overcome these biases and impasses with an easier provision of infor-mation of the data processing and the implementation of a data management and a value-oriented model, which would benefit the data subjects.", issn = "2190-3387", url = "http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-46780" }Download
RIS
TY - JOUR AU - Ramírez López, Santiago PY - 2018 DA - 2018// TI - Informing Consent: Giving Control Back to the Data Subject from a Behavioral Economics Perspective JO - JIPITEC SP - 35 EP - 50 VL - 9 IS - 1 KW - Behavioral economics KW - Data Privacy KW - Data Protection KW - General Data Protection Regulation KW - Informational self-determination KW - Informed consent AB - The development of data privacy legislation in Europe and America has been highly influenced by the idea that individuals must maintain the autonomy to take decisions regarding the general purpose and uses of their personal data; an idea that has been generally instrumentalized with the mechanism of informed con-sent. Recently, both companies and researchers in the field have criticized this idea, arguing that with the new advances and technological progress, consent has lost importance due to the ubiquity of the data processing and the absence of real participation of the data subjects. This article seeks to take into account both points of view, by recognizing the importance of the autonomy of individuals to determine the destination of their personal data, but also by understanding the practical implications and the impossibilities derived from obtaining an informed consent from data subjects that are generally unfamiliar with the topic. Based on the analyses regarding the difficulties of obtaining an effective and informed consent, this contribution will examine how some of the bias and impasses stud-ied through the discipline of behavioral economics may help us to understand the current problems in relation to the way in which consent is requested and provid-ed by the data subjects. This contribution concludes by proposing alternatives that seek to overcome these biases and impasses with an easier provision of infor-mation of the data processing and the implementation of a data management and a value-oriented model, which would benefit the data subjects. SN - 2190-3387 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-46780 ID - ramírez lópez2018 ER -Download
Wordbib
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" > <b:Source> <b:Tag>ramírez lópez2018</b:Tag> <b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType> <b:Year>2018</b:Year> <b:PeriodicalTitle>JIPITEC</b:PeriodicalTitle> <b:Volume>9</b:Volume> <b:Issue>1</b:Issue> <b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-46780</b:Url> <b:Pages>35-50</b:Pages> <b:Author> <b:Author><b:NameList> <b:Person><b:Last>Ramírez López</b:Last><b:First>Santiago</b:First></b:Person> </b:NameList></b:Author> </b:Author> <b:Title>Informing Consent: Giving Control Back to the Data Subject from a Behavioral Economics Perspective</b:Title> <b:Comments>The development of data privacy legislation in Europe and America has been highly influenced by the idea that individuals must maintain the autonomy to take decisions regarding the general purpose and uses of their personal data; an idea that has been generally instrumentalized with the mechanism of informed con-sent. Recently, both companies and researchers in the field have criticized this idea, arguing that with the new advances and technological progress, consent has lost importance due to the ubiquity of the data processing and the absence of real participation of the data subjects. This article seeks to take into account both points of view, by recognizing the importance of the autonomy of individuals to determine the destination of their personal data, but also by understanding the practical implications and the impossibilities derived from obtaining an informed consent from data subjects that are generally unfamiliar with the topic. Based on the analyses regarding the difficulties of obtaining an effective and informed consent, this contribution will examine how some of the bias and impasses stud-ied through the discipline of behavioral economics may help us to understand the current problems in relation to the way in which consent is requested and provid-ed by the data subjects. This contribution concludes by proposing alternatives that seek to overcome these biases and impasses with an easier provision of infor-mation of the data processing and the implementation of a data management and a value-oriented model, which would benefit the data subjects.</b:Comments> </b:Source> </b:Sources>Download
ISI
PT Journal AU Ramírez López, S TI Informing Consent: Giving Control Back to the Data Subject from a Behavioral Economics Perspective SO JIPITEC PY 2018 BP 35 EP 50 VL 9 IS 1 DE Behavioral economics; Data Privacy; Data Protection; General Data Protection Regulation; Informational self-determination; Informed consent AB The development of data privacy legislation in Europe and America has been highly influenced by the idea that individuals must maintain the autonomy to take decisions regarding the general purpose and uses of their personal data; an idea that has been generally instrumentalized with the mechanism of informed con-sent. Recently, both companies and researchers in the field have criticized this idea, arguing that with the new advances and technological progress, consent has lost importance due to the ubiquity of the data processing and the absence of real participation of the data subjects. This article seeks to take into account both points of view, by recognizing the importance of the autonomy of individuals to determine the destination of their personal data, but also by understanding the practical implications and the impossibilities derived from obtaining an informed consent from data subjects that are generally unfamiliar with the topic. Based on the analyses regarding the difficulties of obtaining an effective and informed consent, this contribution will examine how some of the bias and impasses stud-ied through the discipline of behavioral economics may help us to understand the current problems in relation to the way in which consent is requested and provid-ed by the data subjects. This contribution concludes by proposing alternatives that seek to overcome these biases and impasses with an easier provision of infor-mation of the data processing and the implementation of a data management and a value-oriented model, which would benefit the data subjects. ERDownload
Mods
<mods> <titleInfo> <title>Informing Consent: Giving Control Back to the Data Subject from a Behavioral Economics Perspective</title> </titleInfo> <name type="personal"> <namePart type="family">Ramírez López</namePart> <namePart type="given">Santiago</namePart> </name> <abstract>The development of data privacy legislation in Europe and America has been highly influenced by the idea that individuals must maintain the autonomy to take decisions regarding the general purpose and uses of their personal data; an idea that has been generally instrumentalized with the mechanism of informed con-sent. Recently, both companies and researchers in the field have criticized this idea, arguing that with the new advances and technological progress, consent has lost importance due to the ubiquity of the data processing and the absence of real participation of the data subjects. This article seeks to take into account both points of view, by recognizing the importance of the autonomy of individuals to determine the destination of their personal data, but also by understanding the practical implications and the impossibilities derived from obtaining an informed consent from data subjects that are generally unfamiliar with the topic. Based on the analyses regarding the difficulties of obtaining an effective and informed consent, this contribution will examine how some of the bias and impasses stud-ied through the discipline of behavioral economics may help us to understand the current problems in relation to the way in which consent is requested and provid-ed by the data subjects. This contribution concludes by proposing alternatives that seek to overcome these biases and impasses with an easier provision of infor-mation of the data processing and the implementation of a data management and a value-oriented model, which would benefit the data subjects.</abstract> <subject> <topic>Behavioral economics</topic> <topic>Data Privacy</topic> <topic>Data Protection</topic> <topic>General Data Protection Regulation</topic> <topic>Informational self-determination</topic> <topic>Informed consent</topic> </subject> <classification authority="ddc">340</classification> <relatedItem type="host"> <genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre> <genre>academic journal</genre> <titleInfo> <title>JIPITEC</title> </titleInfo> <part> <detail type="volume"> <number>9</number> </detail> <detail type="issue"> <number>1</number> </detail> <date>2018</date> <extent unit="page"> <start>35</start> <end>50</end> </extent> </part> </relatedItem> <identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier> <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-46780</identifier> <identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-46780</identifier> <identifier type="citekey">ramírez lópez2018</identifier> </mods>Download
Full Metadata
Bibliographic Citation | Journal of intellectual property, information technology and electronic commerce law 9 (2018) 1 |
---|---|
Title |
Informing Consent: Giving Control Back to the Data Subject from a Behavioral Economics Perspective (eng) |
Author | Santiago Ramírez López |
Language | eng |
Abstract | The development of data privacy legislation in Europe and America has been highly influenced by the idea that individuals must maintain the autonomy to take decisions regarding the general purpose and uses of their personal data; an idea that has been generally instrumentalized with the mechanism of informed con-sent. Recently, both companies and researchers in the field have criticized this idea, arguing that with the new advances and technological progress, consent has lost importance due to the ubiquity of the data processing and the absence of real participation of the data subjects. This article seeks to take into account both points of view, by recognizing the importance of the autonomy of individuals to determine the destination of their personal data, but also by understanding the practical implications and the impossibilities derived from obtaining an informed consent from data subjects that are generally unfamiliar with the topic. Based on the analyses regarding the difficulties of obtaining an effective and informed consent, this contribution will examine how some of the bias and impasses stud-ied through the discipline of behavioral economics may help us to understand the current problems in relation to the way in which consent is requested and provid-ed by the data subjects. This contribution concludes by proposing alternatives that seek to overcome these biases and impasses with an easier provision of infor-mation of the data processing and the implementation of a data management and a value-oriented model, which would benefit the data subjects. |
Subject | Behavioral economics, Data Privacy, Data Protection, General Data Protection Regulation, Informational self-determination, Informed consent |
DDC | 340 |
Rights | DPPL |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:0009-29-46780 |