Citation and metadata
Recommended citation
Josef Drexl, Designing Competitive Markets for Industrial Data – Between Propertisation and Access, 8 (2017) JIPITEC 257 para 1.
Download Citation
Endnote
%0 Journal Article %T Designing Competitive Markets for Industrial Data – Between Propertisation and Access %A Drexl, Josef %J JIPITEC %D 2017 %V 8 %N 4 %@ 2190-3387 %F drexl2017 %X As part of the project to establish a Digital Single Market, the European Commission has launched a ‘Free Flow of Data’ initiative. This initiative is meant to enhance the growth potential of the emerging data economy, which is characterised by the digitisation of production (smart factories) and the advent of digitised products such as smart—driverless—cars, or smart wearables that will be able to communicate with each other and the environment through the Internet of Things. Furthermore, the enormous amount of data generated and controlled by the industry could serve as a most valuable input for other new data-driven services and for applications in the public interest, such as the operation of smart cities, smart and resource-efficient farming, or measures to prevent the spread of infectious diseases. Obviously, this new data economy has to rely on the commercialisation of data. But what kind of regulation is needed in order to make the data economy work? Do we need new ownership rights in data? Or should regulation focus on access in order to make data as widely available as possible? The European Commission is currently trying to formulate answers to these questions. This article aims to assist the Commission by working on a pro-competitive framework for issues of both ownership and access.** In so doing, this article undertakes two things: first, it analyses to what extent intellectual property laws already provide control over data and then discusses the need and justification for introducing new rules on data ownership. Second, it analyses whether EU competition law already provides remedies to promote access to data, and furthermore explores whether and under which conditions the introduction of new access regimes would be advisable. This article is to be considered as on-going research. It does not yet take into account more recent developments in 2017. %L 340 %K Data ownership %K EU competition law %K Internet of Things %K access to data %K data analytics %K data economy %K data portability %K data sharing %K data-driven economy %K database rights %K essential facilities %K refusal to license %K trade secrets protection %U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-46365 %P 257-292Download
Bibtex
@Article{drexl2017, author = "Drexl, Josef", title = "Designing Competitive Markets for Industrial Data -- Between Propertisation and Access", journal = "JIPITEC", year = "2017", volume = "8", number = "4", pages = "257--292", keywords = "Data ownership; EU competition law; Internet of Things; access to data; data analytics; data economy; data portability; data sharing; data-driven economy; database rights; essential facilities; refusal to license; trade secrets protection", abstract = "As part of the project to establish a Digital Single Market, the European Commission has launched a `Free Flow of Data' initiative. This initiative is meant to enhance the growth potential of the emerging data economy, which is characterised by the digitisation of production (smart factories) and the advent of digitised products such as smart---driverless---cars, or smart wearables that will be able to communicate with each other and the environment through the Internet of Things. Furthermore, the enormous amount of data generated and controlled by the industry could serve as a most valuable input for other new data-driven services and for applications in the public interest, such as the operation of smart cities, smart and resource-efficient farming, or measures to prevent the spread of infectious diseases. Obviously, this new data economy has to rely on the commercialisation of data. But what kind of regulation is needed in order to make the data economy work? Do we need new ownership rights in data? Or should regulation focus on access in order to make data as widely available as possible? The European Commission is currently trying to formulate answers to these questions. This article aims to assist the Commission by working on a pro-competitive framework for issues of both ownership and access.** In so doing, this article undertakes two things: first, it analyses to what extent intellectual property laws already provide control over data and then discusses the need and justification for introducing new rules on data ownership. Second, it analyses whether EU competition law already provides remedies to promote access to data, and furthermore explores whether and under which conditions the introduction of new access regimes would be advisable. This article is to be considered as on-going research. It does not yet take into account more recent developments in 2017.", issn = "2190-3387", url = "http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-46365" }Download
RIS
TY - JOUR AU - Drexl, Josef PY - 2017 DA - 2017// TI - Designing Competitive Markets for Industrial Data – Between Propertisation and Access JO - JIPITEC SP - 257 EP - 292 VL - 8 IS - 4 KW - Data ownership KW - EU competition law KW - Internet of Things KW - access to data KW - data analytics KW - data economy KW - data portability KW - data sharing KW - data-driven economy KW - database rights KW - essential facilities KW - refusal to license KW - trade secrets protection AB - As part of the project to establish a Digital Single Market, the European Commission has launched a ‘Free Flow of Data’ initiative. This initiative is meant to enhance the growth potential of the emerging data economy, which is characterised by the digitisation of production (smart factories) and the advent of digitised products such as smart—driverless—cars, or smart wearables that will be able to communicate with each other and the environment through the Internet of Things. Furthermore, the enormous amount of data generated and controlled by the industry could serve as a most valuable input for other new data-driven services and for applications in the public interest, such as the operation of smart cities, smart and resource-efficient farming, or measures to prevent the spread of infectious diseases. Obviously, this new data economy has to rely on the commercialisation of data. But what kind of regulation is needed in order to make the data economy work? Do we need new ownership rights in data? Or should regulation focus on access in order to make data as widely available as possible? The European Commission is currently trying to formulate answers to these questions. This article aims to assist the Commission by working on a pro-competitive framework for issues of both ownership and access.** In so doing, this article undertakes two things: first, it analyses to what extent intellectual property laws already provide control over data and then discusses the need and justification for introducing new rules on data ownership. Second, it analyses whether EU competition law already provides remedies to promote access to data, and furthermore explores whether and under which conditions the introduction of new access regimes would be advisable. This article is to be considered as on-going research. It does not yet take into account more recent developments in 2017. SN - 2190-3387 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-46365 ID - drexl2017 ER -Download
Wordbib
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" > <b:Source> <b:Tag>drexl2017</b:Tag> <b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType> <b:Year>2017</b:Year> <b:PeriodicalTitle>JIPITEC</b:PeriodicalTitle> <b:Volume>8</b:Volume> <b:Issue>4</b:Issue> <b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-46365</b:Url> <b:Pages>257-292</b:Pages> <b:Author> <b:Author><b:NameList> <b:Person><b:Last>Drexl</b:Last><b:First>Josef</b:First></b:Person> </b:NameList></b:Author> </b:Author> <b:Title>Designing Competitive Markets for Industrial Data – Between Propertisation and Access</b:Title> <b:Comments>As part of the project to establish a Digital Single Market, the European Commission has launched a ‘Free Flow of Data’ initiative. This initiative is meant to enhance the growth potential of the emerging data economy, which is characterised by the digitisation of production (smart factories) and the advent of digitised products such as smart—driverless—cars, or smart wearables that will be able to communicate with each other and the environment through the Internet of Things. Furthermore, the enormous amount of data generated and controlled by the industry could serve as a most valuable input for other new data-driven services and for applications in the public interest, such as the operation of smart cities, smart and resource-efficient farming, or measures to prevent the spread of infectious diseases. Obviously, this new data economy has to rely on the commercialisation of data. But what kind of regulation is needed in order to make the data economy work? Do we need new ownership rights in data? Or should regulation focus on access in order to make data as widely available as possible? The European Commission is currently trying to formulate answers to these questions. This article aims to assist the Commission by working on a pro-competitive framework for issues of both ownership and access.** In so doing, this article undertakes two things: first, it analyses to what extent intellectual property laws already provide control over data and then discusses the need and justification for introducing new rules on data ownership. Second, it analyses whether EU competition law already provides remedies to promote access to data, and furthermore explores whether and under which conditions the introduction of new access regimes would be advisable. This article is to be considered as on-going research. It does not yet take into account more recent developments in 2017.</b:Comments> </b:Source> </b:Sources>Download
ISI
PT Journal AU Drexl, J TI Designing Competitive Markets for Industrial Data – Between Propertisation and Access SO JIPITEC PY 2017 BP 257 EP 292 VL 8 IS 4 DE Data ownership; EU competition law; Internet of Things; access to data; data analytics; data economy; data portability; data sharing; data-driven economy; database rights; essential facilities; refusal to license; trade secrets protection AB As part of the project to establish a Digital Single Market, the European Commission has launched a ‘Free Flow of Data’ initiative. This initiative is meant to enhance the growth potential of the emerging data economy, which is characterised by the digitisation of production (smart factories) and the advent of digitised products such as smart—driverless—cars, or smart wearables that will be able to communicate with each other and the environment through the Internet of Things. Furthermore, the enormous amount of data generated and controlled by the industry could serve as a most valuable input for other new data-driven services and for applications in the public interest, such as the operation of smart cities, smart and resource-efficient farming, or measures to prevent the spread of infectious diseases. Obviously, this new data economy has to rely on the commercialisation of data. But what kind of regulation is needed in order to make the data economy work? Do we need new ownership rights in data? Or should regulation focus on access in order to make data as widely available as possible? The European Commission is currently trying to formulate answers to these questions. This article aims to assist the Commission by working on a pro-competitive framework for issues of both ownership and access.** In so doing, this article undertakes two things: first, it analyses to what extent intellectual property laws already provide control over data and then discusses the need and justification for introducing new rules on data ownership. Second, it analyses whether EU competition law already provides remedies to promote access to data, and furthermore explores whether and under which conditions the introduction of new access regimes would be advisable. This article is to be considered as on-going research. It does not yet take into account more recent developments in 2017. ERDownload
Mods
<mods> <titleInfo> <title>Designing Competitive Markets for Industrial Data – Between Propertisation and Access</title> </titleInfo> <name type="personal"> <namePart type="family">Drexl</namePart> <namePart type="given">Josef</namePart> </name> <abstract>As part of the project to establish a Digital Single Market, the European Commission has launched a ‘Free Flow of Data’ initiative. This initiative is meant to enhance the growth potential of the emerging data economy, which is characterised by the digitisation of production (smart factories) and the advent of digitised products such as smart—driverless—cars, or smart wearables that will be able to communicate with each other and the environment through the Internet of Things. Furthermore, the enormous amount of data generated and controlled by the industry could serve as a most valuable input for other new data-driven services and for applications in the public interest, such as the operation of smart cities, smart and resource-efficient farming, or measures to prevent the spread of infectious diseases. Obviously, this new data economy has to rely on the commercialisation of data. But what kind of regulation is needed in order to make the data economy work? Do we need new ownership rights in data? Or should regulation focus on access in order to make data as widely available as possible? The European Commission is currently trying to formulate answers to these questions. This article aims to assist the Commission by working on a pro-competitive framework for issues of both ownership and access.** In so doing, this article undertakes two things: first, it analyses to what extent intellectual property laws already provide control over data and then discusses the need and justification for introducing new rules on data ownership. Second, it analyses whether EU competition law already provides remedies to promote access to data, and furthermore explores whether and under which conditions the introduction of new access regimes would be advisable. This article is to be considered as on-going research. It does not yet take into account more recent developments in 2017.</abstract> <subject> <topic>Data ownership</topic> <topic>EU competition law</topic> <topic>Internet of Things</topic> <topic>access to data</topic> <topic>data analytics</topic> <topic>data economy</topic> <topic>data portability</topic> <topic>data sharing</topic> <topic>data-driven economy</topic> <topic>database rights</topic> <topic>essential facilities</topic> <topic>refusal to license</topic> <topic>trade secrets protection</topic> </subject> <classification authority="ddc">340</classification> <relatedItem type="host"> <genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre> <genre>academic journal</genre> <titleInfo> <title>JIPITEC</title> </titleInfo> <part> <detail type="volume"> <number>8</number> </detail> <detail type="issue"> <number>4</number> </detail> <date>2017</date> <extent unit="page"> <start>257</start> <end>292</end> </extent> </part> </relatedItem> <identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier> <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-46365</identifier> <identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-46365</identifier> <identifier type="citekey">drexl2017</identifier> </mods>Download
Full Metadata
Bibliographic Citation | Journal of intellectual property, information technology and electronic commerce law 8 (2017) 4 |
---|---|
Title |
Designing Competitive Markets for Industrial Data – Between Propertisation and Access (eng) |
Author | Josef Drexl |
Language | eng |
Abstract | As part of the project to establish a Digital Single Market, the European Commission has launched a ‘Free Flow of Data’ initiative. This initiative is meant to enhance the growth potential of the emerging data economy, which is characterised by the digitisation of production (smart factories) and the advent of digitised products such as smart—driverless—cars, or smart wearables that will be able to communicate with each other and the environment through the Internet of Things. Furthermore, the enormous amount of data generated and controlled by the industry could serve as a most valuable input for other new data-driven services and for applications in the public interest, such as the operation of smart cities, smart and resource-efficient farming, or measures to prevent the spread of infectious diseases. Obviously, this new data economy has to rely on the commercialisation of data. But what kind of regulation is needed in order to make the data economy work? Do we need new ownership rights in data? Or should regulation focus on access in order to make data as widely available as possible? The European Commission is currently trying to formulate answers to these questions. This article aims to assist the Commission by working on a pro-competitive framework for issues of both ownership and access.** In so doing, this article undertakes two things: first, it analyses to what extent intellectual property laws already provide control over data and then discusses the need and justification for introducing new rules on data ownership. Second, it analyses whether EU competition law already provides remedies to promote access to data, and furthermore explores whether and under which conditions the introduction of new access regimes would be advisable. This article is to be considered as on-going research. It does not yet take into account more recent developments in 2017. |
Subject | Data ownership, EU competition law, Internet of Things, access to data, data analytics, data economy, data portability, data sharing, data-driven economy, database rights, essential facilities, refusal to license, trade secrets protection |
DDC | 340 |
Rights | DPPL |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:0009-29-46365 |