Document Actions

Citation and metadata

Recommended citation

Josef Drexl, Designing Competitive Markets for Industrial Data – Between Propertisation and Access, 8 (2017) JIPITEC 257 para 1.

Download Citation

Endnote

%0 Journal Article
%T Designing Competitive Markets for Industrial Data – Between Propertisation and Access
%A Drexl, Josef
%J JIPITEC
%D 2017
%V 8
%N 4
%@ 2190-3387
%F drexl2017
%X As part of the project to establish a Digital Single Market, the European Commission has launched a ‘Free Flow of Data’ initiative. This initiative is meant to enhance the growth potential of the emerging data economy, which is characterised by the digitisation of production (smart factories) and the advent of digitised products such as smart—driverless—cars, or smart wearables that will be able to communicate with each other and the environment through the Internet of Things. Furthermore, the enormous amount of data generated and controlled by the industry could serve as a most valuable input for other new data-driven services and for applications in the public interest, such as the operation of smart cities, smart and resource-efficient farming, or measures to prevent the spread of infectious diseases. Obviously, this new data economy has to rely on the commercialisation of data. But what kind of regulation is needed in order to make the data economy work? Do we need new ownership rights in data? Or should regulation focus on access in order to make data as widely available as possible? The European Commission is currently trying to formulate answers to these questions. This article aims to assist the Commission by working on a pro-competitive framework for issues of both ownership and access.** In so doing, this article undertakes two things: first, it analyses to what extent intellectual property laws already provide control over data and then discusses the need and justification for introducing new rules on data ownership. Second, it analyses whether EU competition law already provides remedies to promote access to data, and furthermore explores whether and under which conditions the introduction of new access regimes would be advisable. This article is to be considered as on-going research. It does not yet take into account more recent developments in 2017.
%L 340
%K Data ownership
%K EU competition law
%K Internet of Things
%K access to data
%K data analytics
%K data economy
%K data portability
%K data sharing
%K data-driven economy
%K database rights
%K essential facilities
%K refusal to license
%K trade secrets protection
%U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-46365
%P 257-292

Download

Bibtex

@Article{drexl2017,
  author = 	"Drexl, Josef",
  title = 	"Designing Competitive Markets for Industrial Data -- Between Propertisation and Access",
  journal = 	"JIPITEC",
  year = 	"2017",
  volume = 	"8",
  number = 	"4",
  pages = 	"257--292",
  keywords = 	"Data ownership; EU competition law; Internet of Things; access to data; data analytics; data economy; data portability; data sharing; data-driven economy; database rights; essential facilities; refusal to license; trade secrets protection",
  abstract = 	"As part of the project to establish a Digital Single Market, the European Commission has launched a `Free Flow of Data' initiative. This initiative is meant to enhance the growth potential of the emerging data economy, which is characterised by the digitisation of production (smart factories) and the advent of digitised products such as smart---driverless---cars, or smart wearables that will be able to communicate with each other and the environment through the Internet of Things. Furthermore, the enormous amount of data generated and controlled by the industry could serve as a most valuable input for other new data-driven services and for applications in the public interest, such as the operation of smart cities, smart and resource-efficient farming, or measures to prevent the spread of infectious diseases. Obviously, this new data economy has to rely on the commercialisation of data. But what kind of regulation is needed in order to make the data economy work? Do we need new ownership rights in data? Or should regulation focus on access in order to make data as widely available as possible? The European Commission is currently trying to formulate answers to these questions. This article aims to assist the Commission by working on a pro-competitive framework for issues of both ownership and access.** In so doing, this article undertakes two things: first, it analyses to what extent intellectual property laws already provide control over data and then discusses the need and justification for introducing new rules on data ownership. Second, it analyses whether EU competition law already provides remedies to promote access to data, and furthermore explores whether and under which conditions the introduction of new access regimes would be advisable. This article is to be considered as on-going research. It does not yet take into account more recent developments in 2017.",
  issn = 	"2190-3387",
  url = 	"http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-46365"
}

Download

RIS

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Drexl, Josef
PY  - 2017
DA  - 2017//
TI  - Designing Competitive Markets for Industrial Data – Between Propertisation and Access
JO  - JIPITEC
SP  - 257
EP  - 292
VL  - 8
IS  - 4
KW  - Data ownership
KW  - EU competition law
KW  - Internet of Things
KW  - access to data
KW  - data analytics
KW  - data economy
KW  - data portability
KW  - data sharing
KW  - data-driven economy
KW  - database rights
KW  - essential facilities
KW  - refusal to license
KW  - trade secrets protection
AB  - As part of the project to establish a Digital Single Market, the European Commission has launched a ‘Free Flow of Data’ initiative. This initiative is meant to enhance the growth potential of the emerging data economy, which is characterised by the digitisation of production (smart factories) and the advent of digitised products such as smart—driverless—cars, or smart wearables that will be able to communicate with each other and the environment through the Internet of Things. Furthermore, the enormous amount of data generated and controlled by the industry could serve as a most valuable input for other new data-driven services and for applications in the public interest, such as the operation of smart cities, smart and resource-efficient farming, or measures to prevent the spread of infectious diseases. Obviously, this new data economy has to rely on the commercialisation of data. But what kind of regulation is needed in order to make the data economy work? Do we need new ownership rights in data? Or should regulation focus on access in order to make data as widely available as possible? The European Commission is currently trying to formulate answers to these questions. This article aims to assist the Commission by working on a pro-competitive framework for issues of both ownership and access.** In so doing, this article undertakes two things: first, it analyses to what extent intellectual property laws already provide control over data and then discusses the need and justification for introducing new rules on data ownership. Second, it analyses whether EU competition law already provides remedies to promote access to data, and furthermore explores whether and under which conditions the introduction of new access regimes would be advisable. This article is to be considered as on-going research. It does not yet take into account more recent developments in 2017.
SN  - 2190-3387
UR  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-46365
ID  - drexl2017
ER  - 
Download

Wordbib

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography"  xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" >
<b:Source>
<b:Tag>drexl2017</b:Tag>
<b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType>
<b:Year>2017</b:Year>
<b:PeriodicalTitle>JIPITEC</b:PeriodicalTitle>
<b:Volume>8</b:Volume>
<b:Issue>4</b:Issue>
<b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-46365</b:Url>
<b:Pages>257-292</b:Pages>
<b:Author>
<b:Author><b:NameList>
<b:Person><b:Last>Drexl</b:Last><b:First>Josef</b:First></b:Person>
</b:NameList></b:Author>
</b:Author>
<b:Title>Designing Competitive Markets for Industrial Data – Between Propertisation and Access</b:Title>
<b:Comments>As part of the project to establish a Digital Single Market, the European Commission has launched a ‘Free Flow of Data’ initiative. This initiative is meant to enhance the growth potential of the emerging data economy, which is characterised by the digitisation of production (smart factories) and the advent of digitised products such as smart—driverless—cars, or smart wearables that will be able to communicate with each other and the environment through the Internet of Things. Furthermore, the enormous amount of data generated and controlled by the industry could serve as a most valuable input for other new data-driven services and for applications in the public interest, such as the operation of smart cities, smart and resource-efficient farming, or measures to prevent the spread of infectious diseases. Obviously, this new data economy has to rely on the commercialisation of data. But what kind of regulation is needed in order to make the data economy work? Do we need new ownership rights in data? Or should regulation focus on access in order to make data as widely available as possible? The European Commission is currently trying to formulate answers to these questions. This article aims to assist the Commission by working on a pro-competitive framework for issues of both ownership and access.** In so doing, this article undertakes two things: first, it analyses to what extent intellectual property laws already provide control over data and then discusses the need and justification for introducing new rules on data ownership. Second, it analyses whether EU competition law already provides remedies to promote access to data, and furthermore explores whether and under which conditions the introduction of new access regimes would be advisable. This article is to be considered as on-going research. It does not yet take into account more recent developments in 2017.</b:Comments>
</b:Source>
</b:Sources>
Download

ISI

PT Journal
AU Drexl, J
TI Designing Competitive Markets for Industrial Data – Between Propertisation and Access
SO JIPITEC
PY 2017
BP 257
EP 292
VL 8
IS 4
DE Data ownership; EU competition law; Internet of Things; access to data; data analytics; data economy; data portability; data sharing; data-driven economy; database rights; essential facilities; refusal to license; trade secrets protection
AB As part of the project to establish a Digital Single Market, the European Commission has launched a ‘Free Flow of Data’ initiative. This initiative is meant to enhance the growth potential of the emerging data economy, which is characterised by the digitisation of production (smart factories) and the advent of digitised products such as smart—driverless—cars, or smart wearables that will be able to communicate with each other and the environment through the Internet of Things. Furthermore, the enormous amount of data generated and controlled by the industry could serve as a most valuable input for other new data-driven services and for applications in the public interest, such as the operation of smart cities, smart and resource-efficient farming, or measures to prevent the spread of infectious diseases. Obviously, this new data economy has to rely on the commercialisation of data. But what kind of regulation is needed in order to make the data economy work? Do we need new ownership rights in data? Or should regulation focus on access in order to make data as widely available as possible? The European Commission is currently trying to formulate answers to these questions. This article aims to assist the Commission by working on a pro-competitive framework for issues of both ownership and access.** In so doing, this article undertakes two things: first, it analyses to what extent intellectual property laws already provide control over data and then discusses the need and justification for introducing new rules on data ownership. Second, it analyses whether EU competition law already provides remedies to promote access to data, and furthermore explores whether and under which conditions the introduction of new access regimes would be advisable. This article is to be considered as on-going research. It does not yet take into account more recent developments in 2017.
ER

Download

Mods

<mods>
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Designing Competitive Markets for Industrial Data – Between Propertisation and Access</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart type="family">Drexl</namePart>
    <namePart type="given">Josef</namePart>
  </name>
  <abstract>As part of the project to establish a Digital Single Market, the European Commission has launched a ‘Free Flow of Data’ initiative. This initiative is meant to enhance the growth potential of the emerging data economy, which is characterised by the digitisation of production (smart factories) and the advent of digitised products such as smart—driverless—cars, or smart wearables that will be able to communicate with each other and the environment through the Internet of Things. Furthermore, the enormous amount of data generated and controlled by the industry could serve as a most valuable input for other new data-driven services and for applications in the public interest, such as the operation of smart cities, smart and resource-efficient farming, or measures to prevent the spread of infectious diseases. Obviously, this new data economy has to rely on the commercialisation of data. But what kind of regulation is needed in order to make the data economy work? Do we need new ownership rights in data? Or should regulation focus on access in order to make data as widely available as possible? The European Commission is currently trying to formulate answers to these questions. This article aims to assist the Commission by working on a pro-competitive framework for issues of both ownership and access.** In so doing, this article undertakes two things: first, it analyses to what extent intellectual property laws already provide control over data and then discusses the need and justification for introducing new rules on data ownership. Second, it analyses whether EU competition law already provides remedies to promote access to data, and furthermore explores whether and under which conditions the introduction of new access regimes would be advisable. This article is to be considered as on-going research. It does not yet take into account more recent developments in 2017.</abstract>
  <subject>
    <topic>Data ownership</topic>
    <topic>EU competition law</topic>
    <topic>Internet of Things</topic>
    <topic>access to data</topic>
    <topic>data analytics</topic>
    <topic>data economy</topic>
    <topic>data portability</topic>
    <topic>data sharing</topic>
    <topic>data-driven economy</topic>
    <topic>database rights</topic>
    <topic>essential facilities</topic>
    <topic>refusal to license</topic>
    <topic>trade secrets protection</topic>
  </subject>
  <classification authority="ddc">340</classification>
  <relatedItem type="host">
    <genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
    <genre>academic journal</genre>
    <titleInfo>
      <title>JIPITEC</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <part>
      <detail type="volume">
        <number>8</number>
      </detail>
      <detail type="issue">
        <number>4</number>
      </detail>
      <date>2017</date>
      <extent unit="page">
        <start>257</start>
        <end>292</end>
      </extent>
    </part>
  </relatedItem>
  <identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier>
  <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-46365</identifier>
  <identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-46365</identifier>
  <identifier type="citekey">drexl2017</identifier>
</mods>
Download

Full Metadata

JIPITEC – Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law
Article search
Extended article search
Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter
Follow Us
twitter