Document Actions
Citation and metadata
Recommended citation
Bart van der Sloot, Privacy as human flourishing: Could a shift towards virtue ethics strengthen privacy protection in the age of Big Data?, 5 (2014) JIPITEC 230 para 1.
Download Citation
Endnote
%0 Journal Article %T Privacy as human flourishing: Could a shift towards virtue ethics strengthen privacy protection in the age of Big Data? %A van der Sloot, Bart %J JIPITEC %D 2014 %V 5 %N 3 %@ 2190-3387 %F van der sloot2014 %X Privacy is commonly seen as an instrumental value in relation to negative freedom, human dignity and personal autonomy. Article 8 ECHR, protecting the right to privacy, was originally coined as a doctrine protecting the negative freedom of citizens in vertical relations, that is between citizen and state. Over the years, the Court has extended privacy protection to horizontal relations and has gradually accepted that individual autonomy is an equally important value underlying the right to privacy. However, in most of the recent cases regarding Article 8 ECHR, the Court goes beyond the protection of negative freedom and individual autonomy and instead focuses self-expression, personal development and human flourishing. Accepting this virtue ethical notion, in addition to the traditional Kantian focus on individual autonomy and human dignity, as a core value of Article 8 ECHR may prove vital for the protection of privacy in the age of Big Data. %L 340 %K Big Data %K European Convention on Human Rights %K Negative Freedom %K Privacy %U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-40978 %P 230-244Download
Bibtex
@Article{vandersloot2014,
author = "van der Sloot, Bart",
title = "Privacy as human flourishing: Could a shift towards virtue ethics strengthen privacy protection in the age of Big Data?",
journal = "JIPITEC",
year = "2014",
volume = "5",
number = "3",
pages = "230--244",
keywords = "Big Data; European Convention on Human Rights; Negative Freedom; Privacy",
abstract = "Privacy is commonly seen as an instrumental value in relation to negative freedom, human dignity and personal autonomy. Article 8 ECHR, protecting the right to privacy, was originally coined as a doctrine protecting the negative freedom of citizens in vertical relations, that is between citizen and state. Over the years, the Court has extended privacy protection to horizontal relations and has gradually accepted that individual autonomy is an equally important value underlying the right to privacy. However, in most of the recent cases regarding Article 8 ECHR, the Court goes beyond the protection of negative freedom and individual autonomy and instead focuses self-expression, personal development and human flourishing. Accepting this virtue ethical notion, in addition to the traditional Kantian focus on individual autonomy and human dignity, as a core value of Article 8 ECHR may prove vital for the protection of privacy in the age of Big Data.",
issn = "2190-3387",
url = "http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-40978"
}
Download
RIS
TY - JOUR AU - van der Sloot, Bart PY - 2014 DA - 2014// TI - Privacy as human flourishing: Could a shift towards virtue ethics strengthen privacy protection in the age of Big Data? JO - JIPITEC SP - 230 EP - 244 VL - 5 IS - 3 KW - Big Data KW - European Convention on Human Rights KW - Negative Freedom KW - Privacy AB - Privacy is commonly seen as an instrumental value in relation to negative freedom, human dignity and personal autonomy. Article 8 ECHR, protecting the right to privacy, was originally coined as a doctrine protecting the negative freedom of citizens in vertical relations, that is between citizen and state. Over the years, the Court has extended privacy protection to horizontal relations and has gradually accepted that individual autonomy is an equally important value underlying the right to privacy. However, in most of the recent cases regarding Article 8 ECHR, the Court goes beyond the protection of negative freedom and individual autonomy and instead focuses self-expression, personal development and human flourishing. Accepting this virtue ethical notion, in addition to the traditional Kantian focus on individual autonomy and human dignity, as a core value of Article 8 ECHR may prove vital for the protection of privacy in the age of Big Data. SN - 2190-3387 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-40978 ID - van der sloot2014 ER -Download
Wordbib
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" > <b:Source> <b:Tag>van der sloot2014</b:Tag> <b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType> <b:Year>2014</b:Year> <b:PeriodicalTitle>JIPITEC</b:PeriodicalTitle> <b:Volume>5</b:Volume> <b:Issue>3</b:Issue> <b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-40978</b:Url> <b:Pages>230-244</b:Pages> <b:Author> <b:Author><b:NameList> <b:Person><b:Last>van der Sloot</b:Last><b:First>Bart</b:First></b:Person> </b:NameList></b:Author> </b:Author> <b:Title>Privacy as human flourishing: Could a shift towards virtue ethics strengthen privacy protection in the age of Big Data?</b:Title> <b:Comments>Privacy is commonly seen as an instrumental value in relation to negative freedom, human dignity and personal autonomy. Article 8 ECHR, protecting the right to privacy, was originally coined as a doctrine protecting the negative freedom of citizens in vertical relations, that is between citizen and state. Over the years, the Court has extended privacy protection to horizontal relations and has gradually accepted that individual autonomy is an equally important value underlying the right to privacy. However, in most of the recent cases regarding Article 8 ECHR, the Court goes beyond the protection of negative freedom and individual autonomy and instead focuses self-expression, personal development and human flourishing. Accepting this virtue ethical notion, in addition to the traditional Kantian focus on individual autonomy and human dignity, as a core value of Article 8 ECHR may prove vital for the protection of privacy in the age of Big Data.</b:Comments> </b:Source> </b:Sources>Download
ISI
PT Journal AU van der Sloot, B TI Privacy as human flourishing: Could a shift towards virtue ethics strengthen privacy protection in the age of Big Data? SO JIPITEC PY 2014 BP 230 EP 244 VL 5 IS 3 DE Big Data; European Convention on Human Rights; Negative Freedom; Privacy AB Privacy is commonly seen as an instrumental value in relation to negative freedom, human dignity and personal autonomy. Article 8 ECHR, protecting the right to privacy, was originally coined as a doctrine protecting the negative freedom of citizens in vertical relations, that is between citizen and state. Over the years, the Court has extended privacy protection to horizontal relations and has gradually accepted that individual autonomy is an equally important value underlying the right to privacy. However, in most of the recent cases regarding Article 8 ECHR, the Court goes beyond the protection of negative freedom and individual autonomy and instead focuses self-expression, personal development and human flourishing. Accepting this virtue ethical notion, in addition to the traditional Kantian focus on individual autonomy and human dignity, as a core value of Article 8 ECHR may prove vital for the protection of privacy in the age of Big Data. ERDownload
Mods
<mods>
<titleInfo>
<title>Privacy as human flourishing: Could a shift towards virtue ethics strengthen privacy protection in the age of Big Data?</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="family">van der Sloot</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Bart</namePart>
</name>
<abstract>Privacy is commonly seen as an instrumental value in relation to negative freedom, human dignity and personal autonomy. Article 8 ECHR, protecting the right to privacy, was originally coined as a doctrine protecting the negative freedom of citizens in vertical relations, that is between citizen and state. Over the years, the Court has extended privacy protection to horizontal relations and has gradually accepted that individual autonomy is an equally important value underlying the right to privacy. However, in most of the recent cases regarding Article 8 ECHR, the Court goes beyond the protection of negative freedom and individual autonomy and instead focuses self-expression, personal development and human flourishing. Accepting this virtue ethical notion, in addition to the traditional Kantian focus on individual autonomy and human dignity, as a core value of Article 8 ECHR may prove vital for the protection of privacy in the age of Big Data.</abstract>
<subject>
<topic>Big Data</topic>
<topic>European Convention on Human Rights</topic>
<topic>Negative Freedom</topic>
<topic>Privacy</topic>
</subject>
<classification authority="ddc">340</classification>
<relatedItem type="host">
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<genre>academic journal</genre>
<titleInfo>
<title>JIPITEC</title>
</titleInfo>
<part>
<detail type="volume">
<number>5</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<number>3</number>
</detail>
<date>2014</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>230</start>
<end>244</end>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier>
<identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-40978</identifier>
<identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-40978</identifier>
<identifier type="citekey">van der sloot2014</identifier>
</mods>
Download
Full Metadata
| Bibliographic Citation | Journal of intellectual property, information technology and electronic commerce law 5 (2014) 3 |
|---|---|
| Title |
Privacy as human flourishing: Could a shift towards virtue ethics strengthen privacy protection in the age of Big Data? (eng) |
| Author | Bart van der Sloot |
| Language | eng |
| Abstract | Privacy is commonly seen as an instrumental value in relation to negative freedom, human dignity and personal autonomy. Article 8 ECHR, protecting the right to privacy, was originally coined as a doctrine protecting the negative freedom of citizens in vertical relations, that is between citizen and state. Over the years, the Court has extended privacy protection to horizontal relations and has gradually accepted that individual autonomy is an equally important value underlying the right to privacy. However, in most of the recent cases regarding Article 8 ECHR, the Court goes beyond the protection of negative freedom and individual autonomy and instead focuses self-expression, personal development and human flourishing. Accepting this virtue ethical notion, in addition to the traditional Kantian focus on individual autonomy and human dignity, as a core value of Article 8 ECHR may prove vital for the protection of privacy in the age of Big Data. |
| Subject | Big Data, European Convention on Human Rights, Negative Freedom, Privacy |
| DDC | 340 |
| Rights | DPPL |
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:0009-29-40978 |
