Document Actions
Citation and metadata
Recommended citation
Monica Horten, The Digital Economy Act in the dock: a proportionate ruling, 3 (2012) JIPITEC 81 para 1.
Download Citation
Endnote
%0 Journal Article %T The Digital Economy Act in the dock: a proportionate ruling %A Horten, Monica %J JIPITEC %D 2012 %V 3 %N 1 %@ 2190-3387 %F horten2012 %X The UK’s Digital Economy Act 2010 contains measures to enforce copyright on the Internet, specifically a two-tiered form of a graduated response.The Act was challenged in the High Court by two of the UK’s biggest Internet Service Providers (ISP), who obtained a Judicial Review of the copyright enforce-ment provisions. This paper is an overview of the case, based on the hearing of March 2011 and theensuing judgement. It focuses on the two most hotly contested grounds for the challenge, namely an al-leged failure to notify the European Commission under the Technical Standards Directive, and the pro-portionality or otherwise of the contested provisions. It observes how the judgement accepted the defenceargumentation of the government and the copyright owners as interested parties, and how the ISPs appeared to be put on the back foot. %L 340 %K BT %K Digital Economy Act %K Judicial Review %K Talk Talk %K copyright enforcement %K copyright infringement %U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-33236 %P 81-87Download
Bibtex
@Article{horten2012,
author = "Horten, Monica",
title = "The Digital Economy Act in the dock: a proportionate ruling",
journal = "JIPITEC",
year = "2012",
volume = "3",
number = "1",
pages = "81--87",
keywords = "BT; Digital Economy Act; Judicial Review; Talk Talk; copyright enforcement; copyright infringement",
abstract = "The UK's Digital Economy Act 2010 contains measures to enforce copyright on the Internet, specifically a two-tiered form of a graduated response.The Act was challenged in the High Court by two of the UK's biggest Internet Service Providers (ISP), who obtained a Judicial Review of the copyright enforce-ment provisions. This paper is an overview of the case, based on the hearing of March 2011 and theensuing judgement. It focuses on the two most hotly contested grounds for the challenge, namely an al-leged failure to notify the European Commission under the Technical Standards Directive, and the pro-portionality or otherwise of the contested provisions. It observes how the judgement accepted the defenceargumentation of the government and the copyright owners as interested parties, and how the ISPs appeared to be put on the back foot.",
issn = "2190-3387",
url = "http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-33236"
}
Download
RIS
TY - JOUR AU - Horten, Monica PY - 2012 DA - 2012// TI - The Digital Economy Act in the dock: a proportionate ruling JO - JIPITEC SP - 81 EP - 87 VL - 3 IS - 1 KW - BT KW - Digital Economy Act KW - Judicial Review KW - Talk Talk KW - copyright enforcement KW - copyright infringement AB - The UK’s Digital Economy Act 2010 contains measures to enforce copyright on the Internet, specifically a two-tiered form of a graduated response.The Act was challenged in the High Court by two of the UK’s biggest Internet Service Providers (ISP), who obtained a Judicial Review of the copyright enforce-ment provisions. This paper is an overview of the case, based on the hearing of March 2011 and theensuing judgement. It focuses on the two most hotly contested grounds for the challenge, namely an al-leged failure to notify the European Commission under the Technical Standards Directive, and the pro-portionality or otherwise of the contested provisions. It observes how the judgement accepted the defenceargumentation of the government and the copyright owners as interested parties, and how the ISPs appeared to be put on the back foot. SN - 2190-3387 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-33236 ID - horten2012 ER -Download
Wordbib
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" > <b:Source> <b:Tag>horten2012</b:Tag> <b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType> <b:Year>2012</b:Year> <b:PeriodicalTitle>JIPITEC</b:PeriodicalTitle> <b:Volume>3</b:Volume> <b:Issue>1</b:Issue> <b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-33236</b:Url> <b:Pages>81-87</b:Pages> <b:Author> <b:Author><b:NameList> <b:Person><b:Last>Horten</b:Last><b:First>Monica</b:First></b:Person> </b:NameList></b:Author> </b:Author> <b:Title>The Digital Economy Act in the dock: a proportionate ruling</b:Title> <b:Comments>The UK’s Digital Economy Act 2010 contains measures to enforce copyright on the Internet, specifically a two-tiered form of a graduated response.The Act was challenged in the High Court by two of the UK’s biggest Internet Service Providers (ISP), who obtained a Judicial Review of the copyright enforce-ment provisions. This paper is an overview of the case, based on the hearing of March 2011 and theensuing judgement. It focuses on the two most hotly contested grounds for the challenge, namely an al-leged failure to notify the European Commission under the Technical Standards Directive, and the pro-portionality or otherwise of the contested provisions. It observes how the judgement accepted the defenceargumentation of the government and the copyright owners as interested parties, and how the ISPs appeared to be put on the back foot.</b:Comments> </b:Source> </b:Sources>Download
ISI
PT Journal AU Horten, M TI The Digital Economy Act in the dock: a proportionate ruling SO JIPITEC PY 2012 BP 81 EP 87 VL 3 IS 1 DE BT; Digital Economy Act; Judicial Review; Talk Talk; copyright enforcement; copyright infringement AB The UK’s Digital Economy Act 2010 contains measures to enforce copyright on the Internet, specifically a two-tiered form of a graduated response.The Act was challenged in the High Court by two of the UK’s biggest Internet Service Providers (ISP), who obtained a Judicial Review of the copyright enforce-ment provisions. This paper is an overview of the case, based on the hearing of March 2011 and theensuing judgement. It focuses on the two most hotly contested grounds for the challenge, namely an al-leged failure to notify the European Commission under the Technical Standards Directive, and the pro-portionality or otherwise of the contested provisions. It observes how the judgement accepted the defenceargumentation of the government and the copyright owners as interested parties, and how the ISPs appeared to be put on the back foot. ERDownload
Mods
<mods>
<titleInfo>
<title>The Digital Economy Act in the dock: a proportionate ruling</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="family">Horten</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Monica</namePart>
</name>
<abstract>The UK’s Digital Economy Act 2010 contains measures to enforce copyright on the Internet, specifically a two-tiered form of a graduated response.The Act was challenged in the High Court by two of the UK’s biggest Internet Service Providers (ISP), who obtained a Judicial Review of the copyright enforce-
ment provisions. This paper is an overview of the case, based on the hearing of March 2011 and the
ensuing judgement. It focuses on the two most hotly contested grounds for the challenge, namely an al-
leged failure to notify the European Commission under the Technical Standards Directive, and the pro-
portionality or otherwise of the contested provisions. It observes how the judgement accepted the defence
argumentation of the government and the copyright owners as interested parties, and how the ISPs appeared to be put on the back foot.</abstract>
<subject>
<topic>BT</topic>
<topic>Digital Economy Act</topic>
<topic>Judicial Review</topic>
<topic>Talk Talk</topic>
<topic>copyright enforcement</topic>
<topic>copyright infringement</topic>
</subject>
<classification authority="ddc">340</classification>
<relatedItem type="host">
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<genre>academic journal</genre>
<titleInfo>
<title>JIPITEC</title>
</titleInfo>
<part>
<detail type="volume">
<number>3</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<number>1</number>
</detail>
<date>2012</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>81</start>
<end>87</end>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier>
<identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-33236</identifier>
<identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-33236</identifier>
<identifier type="citekey">horten2012</identifier>
</mods>
Download
Full Metadata
| Bibliographic Citation | Journal of intellectual property, information technology and electronic commerce law 3 (2012) 1 |
|---|---|
| Title |
The Digital Economy Act in the dock: a proportionate ruling (eng) |
| Author | Monica Horten |
| Language | eng |
| Abstract | The UK’s Digital Economy Act 2010 contains measures to enforce copyright on the Internet, specifically a two-tiered form of a graduated response.The Act was challenged in the High Court by two of the UK’s biggest Internet Service Providers (ISP), who obtained a Judicial Review of the copyright enforce- ment provisions. This paper is an overview of the case, based on the hearing of March 2011 and the ensuing judgement. It focuses on the two most hotly contested grounds for the challenge, namely an al- leged failure to notify the European Commission under the Technical Standards Directive, and the pro- portionality or otherwise of the contested provisions. It observes how the judgement accepted the defence argumentation of the government and the copyright owners as interested parties, and how the ISPs appeared to be put on the back foot. |
| Subject | BT, Digital Economy Act, Judicial Review, Talk Talk, copyright enforcement, copyright infringement |
| DDC | 340 |
| Rights | DPPL |
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:0009-29-33236 |
