Document Actions
Citation and Metadata
Recommended citation
de la Durantaye K (2011). How to Build an Orphanage, and Why. jipitec, Vol. 2. (urn:nbn:de:0009-29-31771)
Download Citation
Endnote
%0 Journal Article %T How to Build an Orphanage, and Why %A de la Durantaye, Katharina %J jipitec %D 2011 %V 2 %N 3 %@ 2190-3387 %F de la durantaye2011 %X Currently, lawmakers on both sides of the Atlantic are struggling with the problem of orphan works. In the impact assessment of its proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of theCouncil on certain permitted uses of orphan works, the Eurpean Commission mentions six possible ways of dealing with the problem. Three of the six (a statutory exception to copyright; extended collective licensing; an orphan-specific license granted by collecting societies) have each had their heyday during the past few years. This article examines how and why these changes in popularity occurred. In addition, it explains why a limitation on remedies would be the most adequate solution for the problem in Europe. %L 340 %K Collective Licenses %K Copyright %K European Union %K Limitations on Remedies %K Orphan Works %U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-31771
Bibtex
@Article{deladurantaye2011,
author = "de la Durantaye, Katharina",
title = "How to Build an Orphanage, and Why",
journal = "jipitec",
year = "2011",
volume = "2",
number = "3",
keywords = "Collective Licenses",
keywords = "Copyright",
keywords = "European Union",
keywords = "Limitations on Remedies",
keywords = "Orphan Works",
abstract = "Currently, lawmakers on both sides of the Atlantic are struggling with the problem of orphan works. In the impact assessment of its proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of theCouncil on certain permitted uses of orphan works, the Eurpean Commission mentions six possible ways of dealing with the problem. Three of the six (a statutory exception to copyright; extended collective licensing; an orphan-specific license granted by collecting societies) have each had their heyday during the past few years. This article examines how and why these changes in popularity occurred. In addition, it explains why a limitation on remedies would be the most adequate solution for the problem in Europe.",
issn = "2190-3387",
url = "http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-31771"
}
RIS
TY - JOUR AU - de la Durantaye, Katharina PY - 2011// TI - How to Build an Orphanage, and Why JO - jipitec VL - 2 IS - 3 KW - Collective Licenses KW - Copyright KW - European Union KW - Limitations on Remedies KW - Orphan Works N2 - Currently, lawmakers on both sides of the Atlantic are struggling with the problem of orphan works. In the impact assessment of its proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of theCouncil on certain permitted uses of orphan works, the Eurpean Commission mentions six possible ways of dealing with the problem. Three of the six (a statutory exception to copyright; extended collective licensing; an orphan-specific license granted by collecting societies) have each had their heyday during the past few years. This article examines how and why these changes in popularity occurred. In addition, it explains why a limitation on remedies would be the most adequate solution for the problem in Europe. SN - 2190-3387 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-31771 ID - de la durantaye2011 ER -
Wordbib
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" > <b:Source> <b:Tag>de la durantaye2011</b:Tag> <b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType> <b:Year>2011</b:Year> <b:PeriodicalName>jipitec</b:PeriodicalName> <b:Volume>2</b:Volume> <b:Issue>3</b:Issue> <b:Author> <b:Author><b:NameList> <b:Person><b:Last>de la Durantaye</b:Last><b:First>Katharina</b:First></b:Person> </b:NameList></b:Author> </b:Author> <b:Title>How to Build an Orphanage, and Why</b:Title> <b:Comments>Currently, lawmakers on both sides of the Atlantic are struggling with the problem of orphan works. In the impact assessment of its proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of theCouncil on certain permitted uses of orphan works, the Eurpean Commission mentions six possible ways of dealing with the problem. Three of the six (a statutory exception to copyright; extended collective licensing; an orphan-specific license granted by collecting societies) have each had their heyday during the past few years. This article examines how and why these changes in popularity occurred. In addition, it explains why a limitation on remedies would be the most adequate solution for the problem in Europe.</b:Comments> </b:Source> </b:Sources>
ISI
PT Journal AU de la Durantaye, K TI How to Build an Orphanage, and Why SO jipitec PY 2011 VL 2 IS 3 DE Collective Licenses; Copyright; European Union; Limitations on Remedies; Orphan Works AB Currently, lawmakers on both sides of the Atlantic are struggling with the problem of orphan works. In the impact assessment of its proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of theCouncil on certain permitted uses of orphan works, the Eurpean Commission mentions six possible ways of dealing with the problem. Three of the six (a statutory exception to copyright; extended collective licensing; an orphan-specific license granted by collecting societies) have each had their heyday during the past few years. This article examines how and why these changes in popularity occurred. In addition, it explains why a limitation on remedies would be the most adequate solution for the problem in Europe. ER
Mods
<mods>
<titleInfo>
<title>How to Build an Orphanage, and Why</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="family">de la Durantaye</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Katharina</namePart>
</name>
<abstract>Currently, lawmakers on both sides of the Atlantic are struggling with the problem of orphan works. In the impact assessment of its proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the
Council on certain permitted uses of orphan works, the Eurpean Commission mentions six possible ways of dealing with the problem. Three of the six (a statutory exception to copyright; extended collective licensing; an orphan-specific license granted by collecting societies) have each had their heyday during the past few years. This article examines how and why these changes in popularity occurred. In addition, it explains why a limitation on remedies would be the most adequate solution for the problem in Europe.</abstract>
<subject>
<topic>Collective Licenses</topic>
<topic>Copyright</topic>
<topic>European Union</topic>
<topic>Limitations on Remedies</topic>
<topic>Orphan Works</topic>
</subject>
<classification authority="ddc">340</classification>
<relatedItem type="host">
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<genre>academic journal</genre>
<titleInfo>
<title>jipitec</title>
</titleInfo>
<part>
<detail type="volume">
<number>2</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<number>3</number>
</detail>
<date>2011</date>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier>
<identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-31771</identifier>
<identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-31771</identifier>
<identifier type="citekey">de la durantaye2011</identifier>
</mods>
Full Metadata
| Bibliographic Citation | jipitec, Vol. 2, Iss. 3 |
|---|---|
| Title | How to Build an Orphanage, and Why (eng) |
| Author | Katharina de la Durantaye |
| Language | eng |
| Abstract | Currently, lawmakers on both sides of the Atlantic are struggling with the problem of orphan works. In the impact assessment of its proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain permitted uses of orphan works, the Eurpean Commission mentions six possible ways of dealing with the problem. Three of the six (a statutory exception to copyright; extended collective licensing; an orphan-specific license granted by collecting societies) have each had their heyday during the past few years. This article examines how and why these changes in popularity occurred. In addition, it explains why a limitation on remedies would be the most adequate solution for the problem in Europe. |
| Subject | Collective Licenses, Copyright, European Union, Limitations on Remedies, Orphan Works |
| DDC | 340 |
| Rights | DPPL |
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:0009-29-31771 |