Document Actions

Citation and metadata

Recommended citation

de la Durantaye K (2011). How to Build an Orphanage, and Why. jipitec, Vol. 2. (urn:nbn:de:0009-29-31771)

Download Citation

Endnote

%0 Journal Article
%T How to Build an Orphanage, and Why
%A de la Durantaye, Katharina
%J jipitec
%D 2011
%V 2
%N 3
%@ 2190-3387
%F de la durantaye2011
%X Currently, lawmakers on both sides of the Atlantic are struggling with the problem of orphan works. In the impact assessment of its proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of theCouncil on certain permitted uses of orphan works, the Eurpean Commission mentions six possible ways of dealing with the problem. Three of the six (a statutory exception to copyright; extended collective licensing; an orphan-specific license granted by collecting societies) have each had their heyday during the past few years. This article examines how and why these changes in popularity occurred. In addition, it explains why a limitation on remedies would be the most adequate solution for the problem in Europe.
%L 340
%K Collective Licenses
%K Copyright
%K European Union
%K Limitations on Remedies
%K Orphan Works
%U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-31771

Download

Bibtex

@Article{deladurantaye2011,
  author = 	"de la Durantaye, Katharina",
  title = 	"How to Build an Orphanage, and Why",
  journal = 	"jipitec",
  year = 	"2011",
  volume = 	"2",
  number = 	"3",
  keywords = 	"Collective Licenses; Copyright; European Union; Limitations on Remedies; Orphan Works",
  abstract = 	"Currently, lawmakers on both sides of the Atlantic are struggling with the problem of orphan works. In the impact assessment of its proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of theCouncil on certain permitted uses of orphan works, the Eurpean Commission mentions six possible ways of dealing with the problem. Three of the six (a statutory exception to copyright; extended collective licensing; an orphan-specific license granted by collecting societies) have each had their heyday during the past few years. This article examines how and why these changes in popularity occurred. In addition, it explains why a limitation on remedies would be the most adequate solution for the problem in Europe.",
  issn = 	"2190-3387",
  url = 	"http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-31771"
}

Download

RIS

TY  - JOUR
AU  - de la Durantaye, Katharina
PY  - 2011
DA  - 2011//
TI  - How to Build an Orphanage, and Why
JO  - jipitec
VL  - 2
IS  - 3
KW  - Collective Licenses
KW  - Copyright
KW  - European Union
KW  - Limitations on Remedies
KW  - Orphan Works
AB  - Currently, lawmakers on both sides of the Atlantic are struggling with the problem of orphan works. In the impact assessment of its proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of theCouncil on certain permitted uses of orphan works, the Eurpean Commission mentions six possible ways of dealing with the problem. Three of the six (a statutory exception to copyright; extended collective licensing; an orphan-specific license granted by collecting societies) have each had their heyday during the past few years. This article examines how and why these changes in popularity occurred. In addition, it explains why a limitation on remedies would be the most adequate solution for the problem in Europe.
SN  - 2190-3387
UR  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-31771
ID  - de la durantaye2011
ER  - 
Download

Wordbib

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography"  xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" >
<b:Source>
<b:Tag>de la durantaye2011</b:Tag>
<b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType>
<b:Year>2011</b:Year>
<b:PeriodicalTitle>jipitec</b:PeriodicalTitle>
<b:Volume>2</b:Volume>
<b:Issue>3</b:Issue>
<b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-31771</b:Url>
<b:Author>
<b:Author><b:NameList>
<b:Person><b:Last>de la Durantaye</b:Last><b:First>Katharina</b:First></b:Person>
</b:NameList></b:Author>
</b:Author>
<b:Title>How to Build an Orphanage, and Why</b:Title>
<b:Comments>Currently, lawmakers on both sides of the Atlantic are struggling with the problem of orphan works. In the impact assessment of its proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of theCouncil on certain permitted uses of orphan works, the Eurpean Commission mentions six possible ways of dealing with the problem. Three of the six (a statutory exception to copyright; extended collective licensing; an orphan-specific license granted by collecting societies) have each had their heyday during the past few years. This article examines how and why these changes in popularity occurred. In addition, it explains why a limitation on remedies would be the most adequate solution for the problem in Europe.</b:Comments>
</b:Source>
</b:Sources>
Download

ISI

PT Journal
AU de la Durantaye, K
TI How to Build an Orphanage, and Why
SO jipitec
PY 2011
VL 2
IS 3
DE Collective Licenses; Copyright; European Union; Limitations on Remedies; Orphan Works
AB Currently, lawmakers on both sides of the Atlantic are struggling with the problem of orphan works. In the impact assessment of its proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of theCouncil on certain permitted uses of orphan works, the Eurpean Commission mentions six possible ways of dealing with the problem. Three of the six (a statutory exception to copyright; extended collective licensing; an orphan-specific license granted by collecting societies) have each had their heyday during the past few years. This article examines how and why these changes in popularity occurred. In addition, it explains why a limitation on remedies would be the most adequate solution for the problem in Europe.
ER

Download

Mods

<mods>
  <titleInfo>
    <title>How to Build an Orphanage, and Why</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart type="family">de la Durantaye</namePart>
    <namePart type="given">Katharina</namePart>
  </name>
  <abstract>Currently, lawmakers on both sides of the Atlantic are struggling with the problem of orphan works. In the impact assessment of its proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the
Council on certain permitted uses of orphan works, the Eurpean Commission mentions six possible ways of dealing with the problem. Three of the six (a statutory exception to copyright; extended collective licensing; an orphan-specific license granted by collecting societies) have each had their heyday during the past few years. This article examines how and why these changes in popularity occurred. In addition, it explains why a limitation on remedies would be the most adequate solution for the problem in Europe.</abstract>
  <subject>
    <topic>Collective Licenses</topic>
    <topic>Copyright</topic>
    <topic>European Union</topic>
    <topic>Limitations on Remedies</topic>
    <topic>Orphan Works</topic>
  </subject>
  <classification authority="ddc">340</classification>
  <relatedItem type="host">
    <genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
    <genre>academic journal</genre>
    <titleInfo>
      <title>jipitec</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <part>
      <detail type="volume">
        <number>2</number>
      </detail>
      <detail type="issue">
        <number>3</number>
      </detail>
      <date>2011</date>
    </part>
  </relatedItem>
  <identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier>
  <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-31771</identifier>
  <identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-31771</identifier>
  <identifier type="citekey">de la durantaye2011</identifier>
</mods>
Download

Full Metadata

JIPITEC – Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law

Artikelsuche
erweiterte Artikelsuche
Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter
Follow Us
twitter