Document Actions
Citation and Metadata
Recommended citation
Binding J, Purnhagen K (2011). Regulations on E-Commerce Consumer Protection Rules in China and Europe Compared – Same Same but Different?. jipitec, Vol. 2. (urn:nbn:de:0009-29-31735)
Download Citation
Endnote
%0 Journal Article %T Regulations on E-Commerce Consumer Protection Rules in China and Europe Compared – Same Same but Different? %A Binding, Jörg %A Purnhagen, Kai %J jipitec %D 2011 %V 2 %N 3 %@ 2190-3387 %F binding2011 %X This article provides a comprehensive overview of the regulations on e-commerce protection rules in China and the European Union. It starts by giving a generaloverview of different approaches towards consumer protection in e-commerce. This article then scrutinizes the current legal system in China by mainlyfocusing on SAIC’s “Interim Measures for the Administration of Online Commodity Trading and Relevant Service Activities”. The subsequentchapter covers the supervision of consumer protection in e-commerce in China, which covers both the regulatory objects of online commodity trading and the applied regulatorymechanisms. While the regulatory objects include operating agents, operating objects, operating behavior, electronic contracts, intellectual property and consumer protection, the regulatory mechanisms for e-commerce in China combines market mechanism and industry self-discipline under the government’s administrative regulation.Further, this article examines the current European legal system in online commodity trading. It outlines the aim and the scope of EU legislation in the respective field. Subsequently, the paper describes the European approach towards the supervision of consumer protection in e-commerce. As there is no central EU agency for consumer protection in e-commerce transactions, the EU stipulates a framework for Member States’ institutions, thereby creating a European supervisory network of Member States’ institutions and empowers private consumer organisations to supervise the market on theirbehalf. Moreover, the EU encourages the industry to self- or co-regulate e-commerce by providing incentives. Consequently, this article concludes that consumer protection may be achieved by different means and different systems. However, even though at first glance the Chinese and the European system appear to differ substantially, a closer look revealstendencies of convergence between the two systems. %L 340 %K Chinese and European rules on e-commerce consumer protection %K online commodity trading %K supervision %K regulatory objects %K regulatory mechanisms %K market surveillance %K industry’s self- and co-regulation %K private consumer organisations %K e-commerce %K China %K EU %K consumer protection %U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-31735
Bibtex
@Article{binding2011,
author = "Binding, J{\"o}rg
and Purnhagen, Kai",
title = "Regulations on E-Commerce Consumer Protection Rules in China and Europe Compared -- Same Same but Different?",
journal = "jipitec",
year = "2011",
volume = "2",
number = "3",
keywords = "Chinese and European rules on e-commerce consumer protection",
keywords = "online commodity trading",
keywords = "supervision",
keywords = "regulatory objects",
keywords = "regulatory mechanisms",
keywords = "market surveillance",
keywords = "industry's self- and co-regulation",
keywords = "private consumer organisations",
keywords = "e-commerce",
keywords = "China",
keywords = "EU",
keywords = "consumer protection",
abstract = "This article provides a comprehensive overview of the regulations on e-commerce protection rules in China and the European Union. It starts by giving a generaloverview of different approaches towards consumer protection in e-commerce. This article then scrutinizes the current legal system in China by mainlyfocusing on SAIC's ``Interim Measures for the Administration of Online Commodity Trading and Relevant Service Activities''. The subsequentchapter covers the supervision of consumer protection in e-commerce in China, which covers both the regulatory objects of online commodity trading and the applied regulatorymechanisms. While the regulatory objects include operating agents, operating objects, operating behavior, electronic contracts, intellectual property and consumer protection, the regulatory mechanisms for e-commerce in China combines market mechanism and industry self-discipline under the government's administrative regulation.Further, this article examines the current European legal system in online commodity trading. It outlines the aim and the scope of EU legislation in the respective field. Subsequently, the paper describes the European approach towards the supervision of consumer protection in e-commerce. As there is no central EU agency for consumer protection in e-commerce transactions, the EU stipulates a framework for Member States' institutions, thereby creating a European supervisory network of Member States' institutions and empowers private consumer organisations to supervise the market on theirbehalf. Moreover, the EU encourages the industry to self- or co-regulate e-commerce by providing incentives. Consequently, this article concludes that consumer protection may be achieved by different means and different systems. However, even though at first glance the Chinese and the European system appear to differ substantially, a closer look revealstendencies of convergence between the two systems.",
issn = "2190-3387",
url = "http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-31735"
}
RIS
TY - JOUR AU - Binding, Jörg AU - Purnhagen, Kai PY - 2011// TI - Regulations on E-Commerce Consumer Protection Rules in China and Europe Compared – Same Same but Different? JO - jipitec VL - 2 IS - 3 KW - Chinese and European rules on e-commerce consumer protection KW - online commodity trading KW - supervision KW - regulatory objects KW - regulatory mechanisms KW - market surveillance KW - industry’s self- and co-regulation KW - private consumer organisations KW - e-commerce KW - China KW - EU KW - consumer protection N2 - This article provides a comprehensive overview of the regulations on e-commerce protection rules in China and the European Union. It starts by giving a generaloverview of different approaches towards consumer protection in e-commerce. This article then scrutinizes the current legal system in China by mainlyfocusing on SAIC’s “Interim Measures for the Administration of Online Commodity Trading and Relevant Service Activities”. The subsequentchapter covers the supervision of consumer protection in e-commerce in China, which covers both the regulatory objects of online commodity trading and the applied regulatorymechanisms. While the regulatory objects include operating agents, operating objects, operating behavior, electronic contracts, intellectual property and consumer protection, the regulatory mechanisms for e-commerce in China combines market mechanism and industry self-discipline under the government’s administrative regulation.Further, this article examines the current European legal system in online commodity trading. It outlines the aim and the scope of EU legislation in the respective field. Subsequently, the paper describes the European approach towards the supervision of consumer protection in e-commerce. As there is no central EU agency for consumer protection in e-commerce transactions, the EU stipulates a framework for Member States’ institutions, thereby creating a European supervisory network of Member States’ institutions and empowers private consumer organisations to supervise the market on theirbehalf. Moreover, the EU encourages the industry to self- or co-regulate e-commerce by providing incentives. Consequently, this article concludes that consumer protection may be achieved by different means and different systems. However, even though at first glance the Chinese and the European system appear to differ substantially, a closer look revealstendencies of convergence between the two systems. SN - 2190-3387 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-31735 ID - binding2011 ER -
Wordbib
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" > <b:Source> <b:Tag>binding2011</b:Tag> <b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType> <b:Year>2011</b:Year> <b:PeriodicalName>jipitec</b:PeriodicalName> <b:Volume>2</b:Volume> <b:Issue>3</b:Issue> <b:Author> <b:Author><b:NameList> <b:Person><b:Last>Binding</b:Last><b:First>Jörg</b:First></b:Person> <b:Person><b:Last>Purnhagen</b:Last><b:First>Kai</b:First></b:Person> </b:NameList></b:Author> </b:Author> <b:Title>Regulations on E-Commerce Consumer Protection Rules in China and Europe Compared – Same Same but Different?</b:Title> <b:Comments>This article provides a comprehensive overview of the regulations on e-commerce protection rules in China and the European Union. It starts by giving a generaloverview of different approaches towards consumer protection in e-commerce. This article then scrutinizes the current legal system in China by mainlyfocusing on SAIC’s “Interim Measures for the Administration of Online Commodity Trading and Relevant Service Activities”. The subsequentchapter covers the supervision of consumer protection in e-commerce in China, which covers both the regulatory objects of online commodity trading and the applied regulatorymechanisms. While the regulatory objects include operating agents, operating objects, operating behavior, electronic contracts, intellectual property and consumer protection, the regulatory mechanisms for e-commerce in China combines market mechanism and industry self-discipline under the government’s administrative regulation.Further, this article examines the current European legal system in online commodity trading. It outlines the aim and the scope of EU legislation in the respective field. Subsequently, the paper describes the European approach towards the supervision of consumer protection in e-commerce. As there is no central EU agency for consumer protection in e-commerce transactions, the EU stipulates a framework for Member States’ institutions, thereby creating a European supervisory network of Member States’ institutions and empowers private consumer organisations to supervise the market on theirbehalf. Moreover, the EU encourages the industry to self- or co-regulate e-commerce by providing incentives. Consequently, this article concludes that consumer protection may be achieved by different means and different systems. However, even though at first glance the Chinese and the European system appear to differ substantially, a closer look revealstendencies of convergence between the two systems.</b:Comments> </b:Source> </b:Sources>
ISI
PT Journal AU Binding, J Purnhagen, K TI Regulations on E-Commerce Consumer Protection Rules in China and Europe Compared – Same Same but Different? SO jipitec PY 2011 VL 2 IS 3 DE Chinese and European rules on e-commerce consumer protection; online commodity trading; supervision; regulatory objects; regulatory mechanisms; market surveillance; industry’s self- and co-regulation; private consumer organisations; e-commerce; China; EU; consumer protection AB This article provides a comprehensive overview of the regulations on e-commerce protection rules in China and the European Union. It starts by giving a generaloverview of different approaches towards consumer protection in e-commerce. This article then scrutinizes the current legal system in China by mainlyfocusing on SAIC’s “Interim Measures for the Administration of Online Commodity Trading and Relevant Service Activities”. The subsequentchapter covers the supervision of consumer protection in e-commerce in China, which covers both the regulatory objects of online commodity trading and the applied regulatorymechanisms. While the regulatory objects include operating agents, operating objects, operating behavior, electronic contracts, intellectual property and consumer protection, the regulatory mechanisms for e-commerce in China combines market mechanism and industry self-discipline under the government’s administrative regulation.Further, this article examines the current European legal system in online commodity trading. It outlines the aim and the scope of EU legislation in the respective field. Subsequently, the paper describes the European approach towards the supervision of consumer protection in e-commerce. As there is no central EU agency for consumer protection in e-commerce transactions, the EU stipulates a framework for Member States’ institutions, thereby creating a European supervisory network of Member States’ institutions and empowers private consumer organisations to supervise the market on theirbehalf. Moreover, the EU encourages the industry to self- or co-regulate e-commerce by providing incentives. Consequently, this article concludes that consumer protection may be achieved by different means and different systems. However, even though at first glance the Chinese and the European system appear to differ substantially, a closer look revealstendencies of convergence between the two systems. ER
Mods
<mods>
<titleInfo>
<title>Regulations on E-Commerce Consumer Protection Rules in China and Europe Compared – Same Same but Different?</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="family">Binding</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Jörg</namePart>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="family">Purnhagen</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Kai</namePart>
</name>
<abstract>This article provides a comprehensive overview of the regulations on e-commerce protection rules in China and the European Union. It starts by giving a general
overview of different approaches towards consumer protection in e-commerce. This article then scrutinizes the current legal system in China by mainly
focusing on SAIC’s “Interim Measures for the Administration of Online Commodity Trading and Relevant Service Activities”. The subsequent
chapter covers the supervision of consumer protection in e-commerce in China, which covers both the regulatory objects of online commodity trading and the applied regulatory
mechanisms. While the regulatory objects include operating agents, operating objects, operating behavior, electronic contracts, intellectual property and consumer protection, the regulatory mechanisms for e-commerce in China combines market mechanism and industry self-discipline under the government’s administrative regulation.
Further, this article examines the current European legal system in online commodity trading. It outlines the aim and the scope of EU legislation in the respective field. Subsequently, the paper describes the European approach towards the supervision of consumer protection in e-commerce. As there is no central EU agency for consumer protection in e-commerce transactions, the EU stipulates a framework for Member States’ institutions, thereby creating a European supervisory network of Member States’ institutions and empowers private consumer organisations to supervise the market on their
behalf. Moreover, the EU encourages the industry to self- or co-regulate e-commerce by providing incentives. Consequently, this article concludes that consumer protection may be achieved by different means and different systems. However, even though at first glance the Chinese and the European system appear to differ substantially, a closer look reveals
tendencies of convergence between the two systems.</abstract>
<subject>
<topic>Chinese and European rules on e-commerce consumer protection</topic>
<topic>online commodity trading</topic>
<topic>supervision</topic>
<topic>regulatory objects</topic>
<topic>regulatory mechanisms</topic>
<topic>market surveillance</topic>
<topic>industry’s self- and co-regulation</topic>
<topic>private consumer organisations</topic>
<topic>e-commerce</topic>
<topic>China</topic>
<topic>EU</topic>
<topic>consumer protection</topic>
</subject>
<classification authority="ddc">340</classification>
<relatedItem type="host">
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<genre>academic journal</genre>
<titleInfo>
<title>jipitec</title>
</titleInfo>
<part>
<detail type="volume">
<number>2</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<number>3</number>
</detail>
<date>2011</date>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="issn">2190-3387</identifier>
<identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-31735</identifier>
<identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-31735</identifier>
<identifier type="citekey">binding2011</identifier>
</mods>
Full Metadata
| Bibliographic Citation | jipitec, Vol. 2, Iss. 3 |
|---|---|
| Title | Regulations on E-Commerce Consumer Protection Rules in China and Europe Compared – Same Same but Different? (eng) |
| Author | Jörg Binding, Kai Purnhagen |
| Language | eng |
| Abstract | This article provides a comprehensive overview of the regulations on e-commerce protection rules in China and the European Union. It starts by giving a general overview of different approaches towards consumer protection in e-commerce. This article then scrutinizes the current legal system in China by mainly focusing on SAIC’s “Interim Measures for the Administration of Online Commodity Trading and Relevant Service Activities”. The subsequent chapter covers the supervision of consumer protection in e-commerce in China, which covers both the regulatory objects of online commodity trading and the applied regulatory mechanisms. While the regulatory objects include operating agents, operating objects, operating behavior, electronic contracts, intellectual property and consumer protection, the regulatory mechanisms for e-commerce in China combines market mechanism and industry self-discipline under the government’s administrative regulation. Further, this article examines the current European legal system in online commodity trading. It outlines the aim and the scope of EU legislation in the respective field. Subsequently, the paper describes the European approach towards the supervision of consumer protection in e-commerce. As there is no central EU agency for consumer protection in e-commerce transactions, the EU stipulates a framework for Member States’ institutions, thereby creating a European supervisory network of Member States’ institutions and empowers private consumer organisations to supervise the market on their behalf. Moreover, the EU encourages the industry to self- or co-regulate e-commerce by providing incentives. Consequently, this article concludes that consumer protection may be achieved by different means and different systems. However, even though at first glance the Chinese and the European system appear to differ substantially, a closer look reveals tendencies of convergence between the two systems. |
| Subject | Chinese and European rules on e-commerce consumer protection, online commodity trading, supervision, regulatory objects, regulatory mechanisms, market surveillance, industry’s self- and co-regulation, private consumer organisations, e-commerce, China, EU, consumer protection |
| DDC | 340 |
| Rights | DPPL |
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:0009-29-31735 |